Society wants moderate voices. But moderate voices cannot overthrow extreme voices.

New album “Beautiful Devastation” is on all major platforms now. Although I’d prefer you use a V4V protocol for those zaps!! Give me some feedback please.

If you need some motivational jams, be like @Derek Ross

ZapTrax - Nostr Music Player

Discover and stream music on Nostr with Wavlake integration. Create playlists, like tracks, and support artists with Lightning zaps.

View quoted note →

Gm Nostr. ☕️ Freedom isn't about doing what you want, it's about not needing what everyone else is addicted to. Now go crush today and I’ll catch y’all in a bit. PV.

We have one chance to raise our children well. Don’t let them drift through formative years distracted by the chaos and empty promises of their generation. Be intentional. Be present.

Nostr is best used to state the obvious and most culturally controversial topics. Including… The fact that decentralization doesn’t automatically create better discourse. It just removes the ability to blame centralized gatekeepers for our own intellectual laziness. That “censorship resistance” means protecting speech you find repugnant, not just speech you happen to agree with this week. That most people claiming they want freedom of association actually want freedom from consequences of their associations. That building parallel systems is harder than complaining about existing ones, and most revolutionaries are better at manifestos than maintenance. That value for value models only work if people actually value the thing enough to pay for it, which is a market signal some creators don’t want to hear. That your keys, your notes, your responsibility also means your mistakes, your reputation, your problem. That we’ve simply moved the trust assumptions around, not eliminated them, and pretending otherwise is intellectual dishonesty. The real test of any protocol isn’t its technical specifications. It’s whether it can survive its own success without replicating the exact power structures it claimed to replace. Discuss.

Besides flat screen TVs, what else has deflated over the last decade?

How do you buy your coffee? Whole, ground or Pod refills? Either way you can buy some small batch roasted coffee the way you brew your coffee from my boys own coffee roasting business through their square store. You can pay in Bitcoin peeps. Their coffee is amazing. Boost this note!!

CoDee's Coffee Roasters, Coffee Roasters, Menifee Coffee, Fresh Roasted coffee, specialty coffee beans

Home | CoDee's Coffee Roasters, Coffee Roasters, Menifee Coffee, Fresh Roasted coffee, specialty coffee beans

Sowell would likely say that even Bitcoin involves trade offs, that giving up monetary flexibility means giving up tools to respond to crises. Fair enough. But perhaps the real trade off is between short term political convenience and long term civilizational trust. If so, Bitcoin isn’t utopian thinking. It’s the most Sowellian position of all.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

GM As we close out 2025, I’ve been thinking about all the fun moments that made this year special here on Nostr. It’s been a blast as always. To everyone who shared their thoughts, their art, their code, their support, and their weirdness, THANK YOU. You made this corner of the internet feel alive and human and I can’t wait for what’s next.

A post Christmas GM to everyone. Anyone get some Sats for Christmas?

Is there a greater gift on Nostr than that of the zap? Not a chance! Every comment receives a zap back! To the season for giving. #ZapBack #ChristmasZaps

Gm Nostr! Merry Christmas Eve! Grateful for all of you!

What makes Nostr feel authentic? Each timezone brings its own personality to the feed. Log in at different hours and you’re not just seeing different people, you’re experiencing different worlds, different conversations, different rhythms. That geographical diversity, unfiltered by algorithms, is what makes this place real.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

The best thing on Nostr is that nobody is bought and paid for!

Is this accurate? A man can endure a lot of things, but being disrespected is not one of them. Why? Because respect is the foundation of his social existence. A man can survive poverty, physical pain, even betrayal, but disrespect attacks his fundamental sense of worth and status in the social hierarchy. It’s not about ego. It’s about the implicit message that disrespect sends: “You don’t matter. Your boundaries mean nothing. You can be violated without consequence.” No functional society, relationship, or self can be built on that foundation. Tolerating disrespect doesn’t make you stronger or more enlightened. It makes you a doormat. And nature has no use for doormats.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

The Case for Fighting Fair (When No One Else Will) Charitable warfare is the practice of interpreting your opponent’s position in its strongest, most coherent form before engaging with it. Essentially steelmanning rather than strawmanning in ideological conflict. The principle demands we ask what the most thoughtful proponent of this view would argue, rather than seeking out the dumbest version we can attack. Why it’s absent: Our information ecosystem rewards the opposite. Algorithms amplify outrage. Quote tweets showcase dunks on the weakest arguments. We’re incentivized to find the most extreme, least defensible version of opposing views because it generates engagement and makes our side feel superior. Implementation requires three commitments First is epistemic humility. We must acknowledge that intelligent, moral people can reach different conclusions from the same evidence. Second is asymmetric interpretation. We should be more charitable to others’ arguments than our own, since we naturally favor our positions. Third is public modeling. We need to visibly engage with the strongest counterarguments, even when easier targets exist. When to implement it: Always, but especially when stakes are highest. The more consequential the disagreement about governance, rights, or resource allocation, the more critical that we engage with actual positions rather than caricatures. The irony is that charitable warfare proves more effective for persuasion than its alternative. People change their minds when they feel understood, not when they feel mocked. We’re not losing arguments. We’re losing the capacity to have them. Spread this note like wildfire 🔥

There’s something deeply cynical about politicians who declare “America is a Christian nation” while their own lives tell a different story. JD Vance says Christianity is America’s Creed, yet he’s married to a Hindu and celebrates Hanukkah with his family. I’m not questioning his marriage or his respect for other faiths. I’m questioning the authenticity of his public theology. As a reformed Christian, I believe America’s founding was deeply shaped by Christian ethics and moral reasoning. That’s a historical reality we can trace through the documents, debates, and institutions our founders created. But there’s a massive difference between acknowledging that influence and weaponizing faith for electoral advantage. When politicians suddenly discover the language of Christian nationalism at precisely the moment it polls well with their base, we have an obligation to call it what it is: pandering. They’re not defending the faith. They’re using it as a vehicle to power. The gospel doesn’t need politicians to protect it. It needs believers who live with integrity, who refuse to let our most sacred convictions become just another campaign strategy. When faith becomes nothing more than a demographic to capture, we’ve lost something essential. I’d rather have a leader who lives their convictions quietly and inconsistently than one who performs them loudly while calculating their next move. At least the first one isn’t treating my faith like a focus group finding.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​