I need to make 10,000 "To Do" apps. Money is no obstacle and I don't want to learn anything from these projects. Thank god vibe coding exists...

A lot of you probably don't know this, but in real life I'm actually a gardener. Just the other day I was looking at a BRAND NEW glove and do you know what I found? A hole! So yeah, I stuck my hand in the glove's hole and got to work on gardening.

I've had some pretty horrific nightmares before. Is it weird that I've never been scared to sleep because of them, or hated them after the fact? Like, I'll awake with a start and it will take me a moment to remember where I am, but nightmares aren't real. Why should I be upset about dreaming them?

It's super fucked up what just happened to me. I was having an imaginary argument in the shower (which I do a lot) but then the other guy's argument struck me at the core of my being. No comeback whatsoever to that devastating observation. I avoid good experiences from bad things because other people believe that experiences themselves have inherent value. However I allow bad experiences from good things because I personally believe that experiences themselves have no inherent value. Like... isn't that a contradiction? In one case I'm acting based on other people's beliefs, and in the other case I'm acting based on my own beliefs. Shouldn't I just choose one and stick with it? Because at this point it seems like I just hate good experiences and like bad experiences. I refuse to accept that, but it would be really nice to have SOMETHING I could point to showing that's not the case. If you argue against yourself and lose then does that make you good at arguing or bad at arguing?

One of my favorite rhetorical techniques is to use multiple negative descriptors to criticize something, and then to complement an alternative, but still keep one of the negative descriptors. Here is a recent paraphrased example: "We should rise above the abstract and meaningless semantic arguments so we can have a more concrete and meaningful semantic argument instead" I feel like this language trick encourages critical thinking. Just because a descriptor has a bad connotation doesn't mean you should be afraid to use it for something you approve of. Especially if it is one of the cases where the descriptor is accurate and good.

People talk about how important it is to use a person's preferred pronouns, like "he" or "she". However I believe that the most polite and respectful pronoun is "you". If you are going to talk about someone, the best thing you can do is to talk TO them. Plus "you" is gender neutral.

Are you planning out a busy and productive day because you actually want to be busy and productive? Or because you are bored and because planning stuff out is a good way to occupy your mind?

The sandman ran me over with a big truck breaking every bone in my body.

Peeopl say "don't meet your hero". Well, my hero is Goku, so I don't think that's going to be a problem. What I'm really interested in is whether people should meet their villains. There isn't a saying about that one to my knowledge.

I bragged to a police officer about getting away with a crime, and that bastard arrested me! So much for free speech!

Mao anounces one day that China has freedom of speech. Skeptical, one citizen hesitantly says "Taiwan is its own country". He is immediately captured and is never seen again. "WTF!" one person complains. "I thought we had free speech now!" Mao responded calmly "freedom of speech is not freedom from consequences."