The clearnet has rules that the darknet does not. The clearnet was established by the state, and governments have kept a firm grip on it ever since it's creation. The first amendemnt of the US constitution means that SOME portions of the clearnet will have some protection from interference, but even the US government imposes strict requirements on users of the clearnet. (And the US supreme court has long since waived any right to protection from those requirements.) There have been attempts to create censorship resistent platforms on the clearnet, (Nostr, Arweave, etc...) however, these platforms are not truly censorship resistent so much as they simply deny data hosting users the ability to perform their legal duties. If data hosting users are not able to fulfil their state imposed obligations, then I see no future except one where the protocol itself is banned from the clearnet.

"Genie, I wish for general life fulfilment." "I'm sorry, I cannot grant that wish. If I just did everything for you, it would not be truly meaningful and-" "I wish it would be." "Oh shit, nevermind."

Firefox crashed in the middle of writing up a response in a technical discussion I was having. Apparently applying the newly downloaded update was so important that it literally could not wait 5 seconds for me to copy and paste what I had written. Damn software...

Listen, I get why battery is illegal, but why is assault illegal? It is my god given first amendment right to threaten to hurt people.

Watching American Nigga Warrior rn. It is NOT going how I remember it...

URGENT NOTICE FROM THE IRS! UNPAID TAXES! OPEN LETTER IMMEDIATELY! BALANCE OWED: $0.00 MESSAGE FROM AGENT: You don't owe us anything, I just wanted to say hello. :3 Do you want to play on my Minecraft server? RESPONSE DUE WITHIN 5 BUSINESS DAYS OR FEDERAL POLICE WILL BE SENT TO YOUR HOUSE

"Oh no! How am I supposed to prevent squirrels from getting into the bird feeder?! Nothing I do works!" It's simple. Ghost peppers.