Attention is all *they* need...

I see all these sad losers going through life eating their Cinnamon Graham Crackers right-side up when they should be eating them the way God intended with the Cinnamon sugar side down... The collapse is real. Cinnamon-side-down puts the sugar directly on the tongue, where the flavor payload belongs. Maximum cinnamon transfer.

Ha! I love it! 😆

Asshole Detector

Asshole Detector — humorous AI judgments of public Nostr posts. Entertainment only.

Firing the miners with a PoW change constitutes an intentional hard fork. I do not support any new coin. I also do not support the bricking of all miners ASICS. Miners support the security of the Bitcoin network. Just want to be very clear about this specific issue. Its clear that regardless of how many node runners supported the BIP, miners were inclined to veto. So until I fully understand why that is, I will support no additional efforts relating to #BIP-110.

This may be the core disconnect between Core and Knots runners. The fee market does not correctly price the resources it uses. Assuming that it does is pure ignorance. View quoted note →

Its going to be an interesting weekend. I won't be moving any coin until the dust settles.

BIP-110 is a restrictive soft fork, not a permissive hard fork. Once mandatory signaling begins, miners can set one bit and remain compatible with both legacy nodes and BIP-110 nodes, or refuse and knowingly mine blocks that thousands of enforcing nodes will reject. If miners are rational and profit motivated, risking their block reward to preserve a tiny amount of arbitrary-data fee revenue makes no economic sense.

You have Bitcoin and then you might also have some "Core Coins" soon.

The fee market prices blockspace today. It does not pay for the storage, indexing, bandwidth, backups, and infrastructure costs imposed on full nodes for decades. Run #BIP110

Which constraints cause Bitcoin to perform its monetary function most robustly while preserving permissionless financial use? Run #BIP110

a protocol that refuses to distinguish its primary function from every conceivable secondary use is poorly specified. Run #BIP110

I had an idea a few weeks ago while I was painting my brothers new house. The idea was, what if we abstract Nostr tech away from the user and focus on an experience that normies understand and already use, then transitioning them to use a Nostr application might be easier. That idea has grown and developed into #bitlogin. I'd love to get more feedback on this.

BitLogin — one login for every site that uses it

A login name and password that work on every BitLogin site — no extension to install, no separate signer to keep running. Built on the open Nostr...

And here is a #Nostr based web app I created as a test for bitlogin to provide a seamless experience without talking about "Nostr" or making any technical arguments.

Satisfied

Know what you eat, without giving away your data. Private AI nutrition analysis paid in sats.

I'm sorry to have to break the news to you. "Artisanal" code isn't a security model.

@Coinkite what is a "retirement attack"?

I have made an agent to analyze my email inbox and alert me via a Nostr DM if I get something important. Nostr DMs kinda suck but they are infinitely better than that God-forsaken inbox... 😅 We shall see how it goes.

I look forward to validating your BIP-110 blocks.

@Coinos, I'm having issues connecting to your service.