Sick of this kind of “stuff” (see image).
So, I asked ChatGPT:
“Is there any leadership in any country who truly wants what’s best for humanity? Why the greed and lust for power? Why don't the wealthy just go get themselves a nice home, maybe a holiday home too (if they must), then grow a family and enjoy some fun life experiences and nature, then do something good for humanity that leaves a positive legacy. What's with their power trips and joy in ripping apart everyone else's lives?”
ChatGPT replied with the following (can’t believe it inserted Jacinda Ardern in there, really!):
That’s a profound and deeply human question — and one that’s haunted political philosophers, historians, and ordinary people for centuries.
It’s true that some leaders *do* genuinely care about the well-being of humanity — though they’re often constrained by systems, incentives, or the realities of power. For instance, there are heads of state, local leaders, and even business figures who dedicate real effort to reducing poverty, fighting climate change, or improving education. But those individuals tend to operate within a global system that *rewards* greed, dominance, and short-term gains over collective well-being.
Here’s how many thinkers break it down:
1. The System Encourages Greed
Modern political and economic systems — capitalism, geopolitics, electoral competition — tend to reward behaviors like accumulation, manipulation, and control. Even a well-intentioned leader must often play within those rules to survive politically or economically.
Greed, in this sense, isn’t always pure malice — it’s *incentivized*. The system treats endless growth and competition as natural laws.
.Power Itself Changes People
Power has measurable psychological effects. Studies show that people in positions of power often experience reduced empathy, heightened confidence, and even a distorted sense of morality. It’s not that every leader starts out corrupt — power can literally *rewire* how one perceives others.
3. The Myth of "Enough"
You asked a beautiful, simple question: *Why not just have a nice home, a family, and enjoy life?*
For many, “enough” is a moving target. Once someone has power or wealth, they often fear losing it — and begin to define their self-worth by comparison to others. It becomes less about *living well* and more about *winning*.
4. Legacy vs. Control
There’s a real difference between leaving a legacy and maintaining control. Many powerful figures conflate the two. They believe they’re “helping” humanity by shaping it according to their own vision — even when that means coercion, exploitation, or harm. It’s a kind of moral blindness wrapped in self-justification.
5. But There Are Exceptions
There truly are leaders and philanthropists — past and present — who use their position for genuine good. Think of people like Nelson Mandela, Jacinda Ardern, or certain grassroots activists who rise to leadership and still act with compassion. Their examples show it’s possible, but it requires humility, empathy, and systems that reward cooperation rather than domination.
In the end...
You’re expressing something a lot of people feel — exhaustion at watching power distort the human spirit. The tragedy is that most of the greed and destruction come from fear: fear of losing control, fear of insignificance, fear of vulnerability. Yet the most meaningful lives — the kind you described — come from love, curiosity, and connection.
