Months ago, a fellow pleb and I were talking about Stephen Greer's Lost Century. The documentary goes into extensive detail about all of the inventors who have lost their lives and their progress to having discovered a technology, then keeping it secret thinking it would make them filthy rich. I'm those conversations, here on nostr, I mentioned this is the exact platform that will free that sort of energy, free energy, once and for all. This is my first attempt. This is the design i have been playing with for years. The prototype is pending only assembly. The dashed lines in the middle of the red box are gears. The bumps on the top and bottom plates are fixed magnets, all interacting north to north, or south to south. Each 1/6 rotation pushes one magnet or the other from a similar pole. The green boxes are the top views of the fixed plates with set magnets. The principle relies on Nikola Tesla's premise of intervals of 3. Do with it what you will.

We bash fiat all day like it's the nemesis of hard money, but hard money was the standard until farmers and wallstreet, both from separate drives, demanded more lax monetary policy, i.e. printing paper. And those are just the ones i know about. The fact is bitcoin couldn't come into its full form without fiat. Yes, hard money will incintivize integrity and development and long time horizons and all the wonderful things. All the things fiat corrupted. But do you really want to live in a world with absolute scarcity absolutely scarcely? I don't want to give up my coin. I need to transact. Bitcoin will appreciate. Why wouldn't i want to operate in a medium that won't? Something costs you fiat? Who gives a fuck. That memory, that object, that tool, that home will probably appreciate, with due care, more than the medium you used to get it. At very least, it will add more value to your life. If Bitcoin will appreciate faster than real estate as it already has-if it's going to continue to do so-why would you want to give up your absolute scarcity for something that comes with upkeep and taxation? Why not give up your cuck bucks and keep the appreciating asset AND the home? I don't want Bitcoin to kill fiat. I want fiat to keep debasing so my utxos can keep appreciating and i can keep taking out lines of credit that cost me less and less, in relation to my total wealth, which keeps building with each new line of credit. "Check your financial privilege, bro." That's fair. Some people are operating under far more corrupted fiat tools. But if equity will never be attained, why would i, a man, try to destroy one of the tools those exploited individuals too can use to mitigate their desperation? Each medium serves a greater function. Each is only a medium by which to attain the food, shelter, tool that i need to accomplish a certain end. Vying for the death of fiat when we have Bitcoin is akin to vying for the end of hammers when we have electric drills. Yes, one serves more functions than the other. Torque is wonderful. That doesn't mean that sometimes, you don't just need to beat the shit out of something to make it work.

If your government is bigger than Dundar's number, congratulations. You're on your way to a kleptocracy.

Any persian women out there looking for a visa 👀

All i want is the scarcity of Bitcoin and the bounties to decipher its encryption like Monero. Is it so much to ask?

Robert Grant on What is Money just evolved society. I mean it literally when i say you should listen to that episode before you can't anymore.