Baseline RF, EMF in central Wyoming is zero. Our baseline should be zero. Get grounded outside. Go camping. Go off-grid for a weekend
Logan Duvall: "So before we start tell a little bit, like where in the world are you, and are we going to have technical difficulties, or have we has Elon figured it all out?"
Tristan Scott: "[laugs] Yeah, great to see you again, man. I am in central Wyoming. I'm at 8,500 ft at the foothills of the mountains. Uh, no service out here. I brought my EMF meter and the first thing I did testing the RF, EMF exposure is zero out here as a baseline for, you know, whatever the Safe and Sound Pro II measures, 200 MHz to 8 GHz. So, just a reminder that that's what our baseline should be. And then, yeah, I got Starlink Mini. Works really well. I'm hardwired in. And I got solar panels. It's what it's all about.
"And that allows me to be grounded outside all day and really taking in and what we'll talk about a bit is the right input signals to thrive. And even though it takes a couple days to get used to being at almost 9,000 ft, and I did run 16 miles in the mountains the first day I got here. So once you get over that, even with it, honestly, my nervous system's like so relaxed. I feel at ease, like I breathe deeply, I'm calmer, able to just like be myself more as opposed to being on edge, stressed out.
"And that's kind of what we're kind of this electromagnetic environment. It's really hard for people to grasp because it's so non-tangible, not real, not physical. But to me the best way is go camping, go off-grid for a weekend, turn the phone off and then you'll feel it and you'll realize how much kind of better you feel.
And it's, you know, it's not just the light, it's not just the food. There is a non-visible component here of electromagnetism that is extremely underdiscussed and extremely important, but for good reason it's underdiscussed. It's extremely complicated and I'm not going to pretend like I even understand uh a good chunk of it because we're talking about serious physics, serious measurements, variation, cyclicality, all the way to galactic forces causing these things to change and have effects on our biology at at very weak intensities, weak levels. So, and then we have this confounding environment. But anyway, it's a good. . . I was like, 'Do I go into town for this podcast?' I'm like, 'No, I'm staying right here.' [laughs]"
npub1yd2h2lrwchshvm46jq7auh65tjkxmgnapkavh7tjtqq07kknupxsa980tv with Logan Duvall @ 00:39–03:14 (posted 2025-08-24)
Why would I get fat?
npub1jlgf...v44k
I am not a doctor. I do not give health or medical advice. Instead, I excerpt what others say.
Early supplementation with Vitamin D increases the allergic issues. Vitamin K. Hep B. Least medically intervened child healthiest
Dr. Petra Davelaar: "There's all this data that showed that early supplementation with vitamin D actually increases the allergic issues that children have, which I thought was also fascinating, because that's being promoted right now, too."
Dr. Doug Sandquist: "Right."
Dr. Petra Davelaar: "Kids, give them drops. I'm like, No. Don't."
Doug Sandquist: "[…] What about vitamin K? […] That's like the first thing the kids get in the hospitals, right? I mean, isn't that pretty common for most kids because they're worried about the bleed or something like that?"
Dr. Petra Davelaar: "It's common and it's toxic, and it should not happen. Yeah, it's it's a terrible idea."
Doug Sandquist: "[…] Isn't that a hard one for parents to even say no to?"
Dr. Petra Davelaar: "Yeah, I think it is. But you have to make your case, you know."
Dr. Doug Sandquist: "[…] My daughter's 17. I remember they offered her the Hep B in the hospital. And I'm like, why would you give an infant Hep B vaccine? […] I can't. . . It's a sexually transmitted disease or it's a bloodborne, you know, unless you're planning on not using sterile technique in the hospital. I mean, there's really no. . . I mean, my infant's not having sex for a long time, so there's no point in that at zero days old. I mean, she got other ones, but she didn't get that one. I mean, I feel bad for parents now with the whole, the vaccine schedule is kind of crazy."
Logan Duvall: "My fourth child is the least medically intervened and she is the healthiest, by far."
Dr. Petra Davelaar & Dr. Doug Sandquist with Logan Duvall @ 35:44–37:28 (posted 2025-08-28)
Anemia near end of pregnancy normal. Iron supplementation in third trimester associated with more bleeding and more issues
Dr. Petra Davelaar: "One last little piece. Anemia during pregnancy at the end of the time it comes that's normal. It's okay. Don't need to give them iron. And there's this amazing paper from over 100,000 women that they tested in the UK and they found that those women who had supplemented with iron in the third trimester all had more bleeding and greater issues during the birthing process."
Dr. Petra Davelaar & Dr. Doug Sandquist with Logan Duvall @ 34:25–34:55 (posted 2025-08-28)
The blood supply is contaminated
Kevin McKernan: "Now here's the real kicker that I haven't presented on much lately, because this is very recent work. The kicker here is that we're now finding these sequences [the vaccine plasmid DNA] not just in the vaccine, but we're finding it in people. Now we don't know if it's integrated, but it's there. These are studies that weren't looking for it, and the methods they used arguably suppressed the signal significantly. All right, so there's at least five peer-reviewed studies that have come out looking at RNA sequencing of people who were vaccinated and vaccinated. And if you dig through that data that's in NCBI, you can take all those reads, map them against the plasmids from the vaccine manufacturers, and you can find that DNA in these patients.
"There's a study from Ryan et al. that looked at like 75 people in Australia. And there's a great study from Chakraborty that went through that data and demonstrated both Ryan paper and the Odak paper have Moderna and Pfizer vaccine sequences in the patient's blood.
"So this means that the blood supply is contaminated. That's a very serious issue if the blood banks aren't looking for it and re-injecting this into other people. This would have normally, I think, caused an enormous halt in any other scenario once you find components of the vaccine that were never declared, that have these links to oncogenic sequences, and they're now floating around the blood supply and no one's doing anything about it. All right. That should be a concern to everybody in the in the transfusion field.
"There's three other papers that have recently confirmed this. Now there again these papers were not looking for it. The authors were studying other things. But their data has been peer reviewed and put into the NCBI short read archive, so anyone can comb through their data and find these sequences in there. But the Lee study looked at this, the Knabl study looked at this, and the Krawcyzk study looked at this. All of them, I have documented that there are residual sequences from the plasmids that are in those studies infecting their recipients.
"Some of the studies are actually very useful. One of them was looking at a particular disease that I'll point you to my Substack that goes through these. But this particular disease state they did RNA sequencing on to see the difference between the vaccinated and unvaccinated, and you can see some differential gene expression that's occurring in the cGAS-STING and the interferon pathways. All right, that's the sign of potential DNA stimulatory response. OK?
"So some of the RNA sequencing is actually quite revealing as to what the nature of the contaminant is because you can see certain gene expressions get turned on or off that are signatures of a cGAS-STING-like event that could be induced by the DNA that's there."
npub1k8dxqxgnv2p6ymwkamfrx237qjct3zezsx2xevt6z6nzdgalff3qy94qte @ 27:45–30:40 (posted 2025-06-10) https://rumble.com/v6uhd1d-presentation-to-new-zealand-commission-on-mrna-vax-contamination-of-the-blo.html?start=1665
Red light is still a stressor at night
Jakob: "I have one question. Can we get overexposed to red light? I mean, let's say that in a perfect world where everything was like your place […]"
25:31
Dr. Jack Kruse: "You can, because technically light at night is a problem. Just remember how we evolved. Never forget the story of nature we talked about in the first part podcast. I told you that artificial light screwed up the Neanderthals when they were inside in the caves, and then they started writing cave paintings down. That's how they got destruction of melanin and created dopamine. People think that this was progress; it wasn't. It was cognitive de-evolution. Why? Neanderthals had bigger eyes and 125 more grams of brain tissue. This is the reason why they had the big head and the big brow. They lost that. So it turns out even fire at night is a problem. It means light at night's a problem. Remember, red light is still a stressor at night.
"But the reason we don't talk about it that much on podcast is because you guys want to know on relative basis, is red light at night a better choice than the modern lighting we have? the answer is yes.
"But your question was very different to me. You said, 'Jack, can red light also be a problem?' The answer is yes, because it generates a cortisol stress response, and that can actually lower melatonin production in your mitochondria.
"So the accurate answer to your question is yes, it can be a problem. We want darkness at night."
Dr. Jack Kruse with Mads Tömörkènyi & Jakob on the Holistic Disclosure podcast @ 25:20–26:57 (posted 2023-12-18)
Green light and migraines. Glucose reduction from biliverdin increase. It's about the light environment and magnetic environment within the system
Dr. Brian Grimm: "And look at green, too. I think what they're looking at green now, is even though it's kind of a mono wavelength, they're looking at green to kind of calm the system down, right? They're using it sometimes with migraines now. And there's some really interesting new articles about that. I know I think Thomas Seager actually is making a green light for that. But but even just wearing green glasses can improve migraines on patients in certain studies, which is interesting.
"And so yeah, um, if you look at like inside the body, look at bilirubin. We know about bilirubin, right? We know what light absorbs bilirubin, but we also know but what's the precursor to bilirubin: biliverdin, right? And biliverdin is green, right? And actually, there's another article that I'm going to release here shortly where the precursor to bilirubin, which is a breakdown product of hemoglobin, right, the precursor is biliverdin. If you can increase the amount of biliverdin, then that actually absorbs a special frequency of light near infrared, and it releases green to stimulate a reduction in glucose. They got a 60% reduction by just improving or increasing the biliverdin content.
"So these sort of little gold nuggets, I like to call them, or these little Easter egg hunts that we go on, these sort of things are really telling you it's about the light environment, and it's about what that light environment and that magnetic environment within the system, what kind of fields that creates and signals the local cells and the systemic kind of effects."
Dr. Brian Grimm with npub19yjldzc98lsesatjncxzgunm8xpdjsr5tva3sjc9ggyqsjh5hedst2unad @ 33:59–35:34 (posted 2025-09-08)
'I just want to go outside. Why can't I go outside?' Nursing home patients spend 15 minutes outside each month
Dr. Brian Grimm: "One patient that comes to mind that I had, and it brings a kind of a tear to my eye. I remember it's this older guy, he was probably in his 80s or 90s in a wheelchair, and I think his daughter brought him in. And we were talking about this, specifically this, the guy's white as a ghost. He had some underlying autoimmune issues as well. And we talked about getting outside and he looked up at his daughter and he said, 'I just want to go outside. Why can't I go outside?'
"And it makes me remember the article about these nursing home patients, right, where they spend, on average, 15 minutes outside every month."
Dr. Max Gulhane: [shakes his head]
Dr. Brian Grimm: "And I think we're just we're kind of disconnected from this. And I think we've got to reconnect."
Dr. Brian Grimm with npub19yjldzc98lsesatjncxzgunm8xpdjsr5tva3sjc9ggyqsjh5hedst2unad @ 47:03–50:12 (posted 2025-09-08)
Red light heals a tibia fracture. Red light heals a case of AMD
Danny Jones: "Is it true that near infrared light and red light can actually build new neurons in the eyes and help […] repair vision?"
Dr. Jack Kruse: "Yup. […] This happened I think three years ago. Chantal's dad was up in my clinic in Louisiana blowing pine needles out of the gutter. […] At the time this happened he was 80. He's a Marine, falls off the roof, lands on the ground. He breaks his leg. The reason he breaks his leg, he's got a knee replacement. If you know anything about a knee replacement, it looks like a metal plate with a keel in it. The keel, when he hits, splits the tibia in half. […]
"So of course I sent him to the hospital. So he goes to the hospital and the orthopedic surgeon tells him, 'Look, because your leg is broken and you have a knee replacement, we're going to have to let the bone heal and then we're going to have to redo your knee.' So he's looking at major problems. Everything else in his head was OK, his eye was fine, no issues. He calls me up two weeks after the injury and he's in a cast and he's like, 'Jack you got to do something to help me. I have so much pain and I can't shit. I'm taking the Percocet.'
"I said, 'Dave, take the keys to my clinic. Go sit in front of the red light that I have for the NFL football players for the concussion.' But remember he's a jarhead. I said, 'Listen to what I'm telling you. Sit in front of the light, put it on 20 minutes, do it four times a day. You know, I'm not there, you can use it, no problems.' Taught him how to turn it on, taught him how to program it. I said, 'But make sure you wear those glasses, the goggles, when you sit in front of them.' He didn't listen to me. So what what happens? […]
"He goes back to the orthopedic surgeon. This was the funny part. I get a picture from Chantal of her dad on my zero-turn lawn mower cutting my grass, two weeks after this happens. He's like, 'My leg doesn't hurt anymore.' And he goes back to the orthopedic surgeon. Orthopedic surgeon takes an x-ray, can't find the fracture. […] The fracture is healed. And here's the best part. He's walking around in the orthopedic surgeon's office. He's like, 'Dave, you don't even have a limp.' He goes, 'I don't think we're going to have to do your knee replacement either.' So Dave is great. Six weeks later he gets an appointment to go to the opthalmologist. They look in his eyes. He's still doing the red light, because he says it makes him feel great."
Danny Jones: "But he's not wearing the glasses."
Dr. Jack Kruse: "No. He doesn't have AMD anymore. It's gone. This is a guy that for five years was getting the injections into his eyeball with his doctor. The doctor looks in his eye, the ophthalmologist […] looks at him. He goes, 'There's no evidence that you have macular degeneration anymore.' They even do a eye test on him. And I'm sitting there and I'm going, 'Bro, I didn't know that this was possible.' So what do I do? I go back and read the literature. Sure as shit, there's papers out there about this issue, most of them in Japan. Guess who's burying them? Big pharma."
Dr. Jack Kruse with Danny Jones @ 03:09:38–03:13:34 (posted 2024-09-30)
Eat your meals outside after seeing the sunrise. Chrononutrition & type 2 diabetes. Eating high protein at 06:00 ᴘᴍ may prevent reaching a fasted state until 04:00 ᴀᴍ
Dr. Max Gulhane: "I mean, it's just so simple. It's just so incredibly simple that, you know, eating your meal outside after seeing the sunrise. I mean, how simple is that advice? Yet, you know, 99% of people aren't doing it. And the ability to clear out that fatty liver, clear out the hepatic steatosis without even changing the food composition. And that is exactly what the study that I'm thinking of with this chrononutrition study with type 2 diabetics. They didn't change the content of the diet in the intervention group; they just changed the timing of the food. And that was enough to see benefits in type 2 diabetes."
Dr. Brian Grimm: "Well, and I think one thing it does (and we don't talk about enough) is getting to that fasted state. Right? So even with carnivore, and I'm not against that, you know, I'm happy to kind of treat patients like that, too. I've gotten patients better with vegan diets, I've gotten them better with plant-based diets, I've gotten them better with ketosis diets. All of them. It kind of it depends on timing.
"But the interesting thing when I when I talk to patients about that, we talk about the timing, especially of high protein or high fat meals, at what point if you eat those meals, say 04:00, 05:00, 06:00 ᴘᴍ at night, at what point are you going to get into the fasted state? It's dictated by how fast the GI system works, right, and how fast the microbiome within that GI system breaks that stuff down. And so sometimes eating, say, a higher protein, even though if you're a carnivore, eating a higher protein at 06:00 ᴘᴍ may not be a great idea because you're not getting into fasted state till maybe 04:00 or 05:00 ᴀᴍ in the morning. And then what's that signaling?
"The signaling mechanism that we have on our skin, on our eyes, and our brain. Also, the microbiome has a signaling timing, too. And those things like to sleep as well. And they're the ones that are actually shooting that film on the wall of the intestinal lining and and telling that intestinal lining through the neuropods and the anteroendocrine cells what signal, where, when do I stimulate the vagus, when do I not? When do I stimulate this cell, when do I not? So they're the ones in control there and I think we have to give them time as well."
Dr. Brian Grimm with npub19yjldzc98lsesatjncxzgunm8xpdjsr5tva3sjc9ggyqsjh5hedst2unad @ 48:00–50:12 (posted 2025-09-08)
Align meal timing to circadian clock to help reverse metabolic disease. Circadian ketotic. Fatty liver
Dr. Max Gulhane: "There's also the field of chronutrition and this idea that timing of meals affects materially metabolic health. So shoot on that topic, because I feel like even the section of medicine and doctors who are effectively using dietary therapies to help reverse metabolic disease are themselves not even aware of these benefits of aligning meal timing to this circadian clock."
Dr. Brian Grimm: "Yeah. I mean, they're so stuck on the macros, right? And they're so stuck on the label of this diet or that diet. […] And certainly the types of foods that you eat play a role, but it's the timing that plays even a bigger role. And so, right now, you know, they're talking about ketosis, they're talking about carnivore, and things like that. Yes, it will have a benefit. But if you can just do a circadium ketotic sort of diet, which basically means that you're eating almost whatever food you want to, hopefully local, hopefully organic, ideally regenerative. If you do that, but if you stop at a certain time and allow your body to, because it runs on a clock, to allow your body to move things in the proper direction, to have proper field signaling, then you'll get proper storage.
"I mean, look at fatty liver, right? Fatty liver is a prime example. I was reading an article yesterday, I think it was, and it was, I think it was a 2014 article, and they were looking at the timing of eating and triglyceride storage within the liver. And they were looking at mice, so things were flipped, right? They're having an, uh, where mice could eat whatever they want, whenever they wanted, or they could eat just at night, which for us is daytime, right? And they found out that there was, I believe, it was a 60% decrease in triglyceride storage within the liver on the mice that ate at the proper time. And this was, what, 10, 11 years ago. And what's the current treatment for fatty liver?
"Eat right, exercise more. And down the pipe there's some pharmaceutical treatment that's coming in. But that's not going to treat it. I mean, I've had patients where we've just talked about this. We've talked about, 'OK, you just have to go out early in the morning. You have to just go out early in the morning, eat whatever food that you're comfortable eating, hopefully in a healthy way, and then stop eating 05:00, 06:00 ᴘᴍ.' And those patients actually got so much better. Their fatty liver went away on the next ultrasound. And that was without medications. Obviously, we're not treating patients on this podcast. I'm just saying these are things that we have to take into account because they have such a dramatic effect."
Dr. Brian Grimm with npub19yjldzc98lsesatjncxzgunm8xpdjsr5tva3sjc9ggyqsjh5hedst2unad @ 43:14–49:19 (posted 2025-09-08)
Lipid nanoparticles studied for 20 years. LNPs don't work. LNPs are not safe. Do not use in humans. LNPs go everywhere: brain, heart, kidneys, ovaries. They knew
Jessica Rose: "These lipid nanoparticles, these are the fat bubbles that are meant to spherically encase the negatively charged genetic material, supposed to be only nucleoside-modified RNA, but there's also DNA, and there's also hybrids, most likely of DNA + RNA.
"These things have been researched for, like, 20 years. A lot of people don't know this, which is why you'll hear some of these captured people often saying, 'This isn't new! This has been being tested for decades.'
"It's not false. The lipid nanoparticles have been being looked at on the bench, and maybe in some animal models with horrible results, for two decades. And the reason why it's been two decades is the same reason why we still don't have (it's an analogy) a vaccine against HIV. It's because they don't work. It's not safe. That's why.
"So the clincher, the turning point, was the development of an ionizable cationic lipid. Like I mentioned, these positively charged lipids which, you know, they bind and snuggle up the negatively-charged nucleic acids. They become active at a certain pH, like a low pH. So this was the, you know, what I like to think is the turning point for the technology. It's like, 'Hey! Now we can make them "available" in their task to deliver nucleic acids in the "right context," like only when they get into endosomes of cells, you know, when the endosome matures, and the pH gets lower will it release the mRNA (or whatever it is) into the the cytosol of the cell. Yay!'
"But there's so many thing. . . first of all, the safety data sheet on these things, the products used by Moderna and Pfizer, the cationic lipids are ALC-0315, […] and SM-102 for Moderna. And the safety data sheets for both of these say don't use these in animals or people. That hasn't changed. So, you know, there's that.
"And these lipid nanoparticles are like slippery little bastards. And they're supposed to be about 100 nanometers across, which is pretty small. That defines a nanoparticle. So, this lie, it's just a lie, that the people told about these things staying at the injection site, like a normal vaccine, the contents of a needle from a normal vaccine would do, just stay in the muscle cells, whatever. That's not the case here. These little fat bubbles go everywhere. This is known now. We got FOIA-requested data from pharmacokinetic studies that prove this demonstrably. They go everywhere.
"And we already know that anyway because of the systemic nature of the adverse events. You know, they go to the brain, the heart, the kidney. This is all published data. We know. And they knew way before, because there were published studies, like 12 years ago, that show, completely without a shadow of a doubt, that these exact same lipid nanoparticles traffic to the ovaries."
Jessica Rose with npub1guh5grefa7vkay4ps6udxg8lrqxg2kgr3qh9n4gduxut64nfxq0q9y6hjy @ 58:30–1:02:06 (posted 2025-09-08)
The foveola does not have any S cones. Bombarding the photoreceptors with blue light leads to retinal detachments, macular degeneration
Dr. Brian Grimm: "One of the most amazing things that I talk to my colleagues about, I think when you talk about blue light and signaling and […] what's the proper photonic field we should be in, is one of the things I don't hear too many people talk about, and you may know this, Max, is what's the most focal point in the eye as far as your visual field? […]"
Dr. Max Gulhane: "The fovea."
Dr. Brian Grimm: "Right. But what's even more focal and more concentrated than the fovea? […] The foveola. And so what cells, what photoreceptors, are in the foveola? So we have typically cones, right? So you have a high amount of cones. You have S cones, M cones, and L cones, right? […] S cones are typically shorter wave cones, like blue light, violet light. M cones are the middle ones, green, things like that. L cones are the longer ones. So the ones that we're missing in the foveola are the short cones. So, what does that tell you?
"It tells you that the foveola, the highest point of focus within a retinal field, is not supposed to have as the main actor, a blue light source. And if you look in the environment, if you look at evolutionary-wise, look at the world. Do we ever see anything that's blue, just blue, that signals that foveola? No. But now we're just bombarding these photoreceptors, especially within the foveola with these blue images, and our body and our mitochondria are trying to kind of compensate.
"And that's the reason why we have so much visual issues. That's the reason why we have so much retinal detachments, macular degeneration, because we just can't keep up with the amount of regeneration that's required because of the activation of a wavelength that we're not supposed to have. We're supposed to see a blue ocean with colors inside. We're supposed to see a blue sky, but we're supposed to use that as the backdrop, and it's not the main actor. It's supposed to always be the backdrop."
Dr. Brian Grimm with npub19yjldzc98lsesatjncxzgunm8xpdjsr5tva3sjc9ggyqsjh5hedst2unad @ 31:02–33:15 (posted 2025-09-08)
Your body puts on subq fat to protect against the wrong light. MKUltra. The placenta sends blue light to fattens babies. Tech abuse is fattening
Dr. Jack Kruse: "Think about the obesity crisis […] Why do we have this? We have people getting fatter and fatter 'cause things like we talked about before, about the GLP-1 drugs and big pharma. But when you put subcutaneous fat in, what are you doing? You're actually protecting the mass of your brain. And what do we know about children? They're more susceptible to non-native EMF. Why? Because they don't have as much myelin. The more myelin you have, the better able you're to protect yourself. So guess what?"
Danny Jones: "What is myelin again?"
Dr. Jack Kruse: "Myelin is the covering of the brain, meaning the nerves, that insulation. Like if we're talking about wires, it's the black plastic on the outside. That's the thing that gets destroyed in MS. Gets destroyed.
"So when you put this all together, you start to go, so this is a protection system of the little baby when it's being formed. So when the baby comes out, maybe we should start thinking about obesity a little bit different. Is the obesity crisis telling us something about MKUltra? Yup. That's why it's happening. There's an impetus in the environment that's causing us to put subcutaneous fat, because we're constantly around the wrong fucking light right. And guess what happens?
"The placenta in humans, that's exactly what the mother does. If you think about your wife when she was pregnant with your baby, remember the first 19 weeks she only had a little pooch. But she had a flat belly for most of it. All the organ systems are being built in that time. But the baby has no subq fat. Do you know when the baby gets all the subq fat? The last trimester. Do you know what controls that?
"Leptin in the placenta sends only blue light to the baby, subtracts out UV and red. You know those biophotons we talked about? It's fattening the baby up so that it can heal its brain after it comes out of the vagina. Because guess what? If it had a fully formed brain it wouldn't fit out the vagina."
Danny Jones: "Right."
Dr. Jack Kruse: "Got it? So when you begin to see that nature actually does have some insight about why everybody's getting fat now, it's because everybody's being fucking tech abused by the industrial military complex. That's why they canceled Becker."
Dr. Jack Kruse with Danny Jones @ 03:26:44–03:29:05 (posted 2024-09-30)
Sunglasses abusive. Sunglasses decreases melanin production. Sunglasses makes you way more sensitive to the sun. Sunglasses and vitiligo
Dr. Jack Kruse: "Every mammal (but us) doesn't wear sunscreen, doesn't have clothes, doesn't wear sunglasses. I think some moms are going to be stunned by this because the moms are making the big example.
"When I see a mom, and she's got sunglasses on, I know by definition her child is being abused. The reason why is when you put sunglasses on your eyes, do you know what it does? It decreases the melanin production in your skin. So for those of you who don't know, melanin is the thing that gives you the tan in your body. So what does that mean? Wearing sunglasses makes you way more sensitive to the sun.
"That's functionally what happens in people that get the disease (that you've probably heard of) that Michael Jackson had, which is vitiligo. I want you to think about every picture of Michael Jackson from the time he was 25 to 50 before he died. He had sunglasses on. He always wore them everywhere, didn't he? That's where the vitiligo comes from."
Dr. Jack Kruse with Katie Wells @ 14:43–15:43 (posted 2023-02-04)
Instead of a statin, get more sun for high cholesterol. Chronic high cholesterol levels is almost always associated with low vitamin D levels
Dr. Jack Kruse: "Vitamin D is made endogenously in our skin, but vitamin D is a very interesting vitamin because it's not a vitamin; it's a neurosteroid. And vitamin D, one of the things that it does is it gets created in the skin from cholesterol and 312 nm light, which is UVB light. It changes a double bond in a ring in cholesterol to turn it into something called 25-hydroxyvitamin D. That's not the the key factor. It has to go to the kidney and liver then to be converted to 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D.
"So can you have a problem with vitamin D that starts on the skin, or could you have a problem if the kid has a problem with their liver or their kidney? The answer is yes. A lot of times this never gets worked out. The most common reason for children why it's a problem is their skin is blocked from clothing or sunscreen.
"The reason why this is a big deal in adults, let's talk about mom and dad now. Mom and dad, if you look at your blood work, and you notice when they do a lipid profile on you that your cholesterol level is going up, I can almost guarantee you what their answer is. They're going to tell you they want you to be on a statin. I'm going to tell you need to be in the sun more, because guess what happens? High cholesterol levels chronically over time is almost always associated with low vitamin D levels because you're not converting cholesterol into vitamin D."
Dr. Jack Kruse with Katie Wells @ 50:06–51:34 (posted 2023-02-04)
The baby steals mom's vitamin D. Postpartum depression. Childhood cancers always start in the mom's mitochondrial DNA
Dr. Jack Kruse: "If you're a new mom, say you just had a baby, I would tell every mother, 'You want to learn about you? Do a vitamin D level of your infant.' Why? Because where does that baby get all of its vitamin D from? You. The baby is stealing it from you. And so for example, if you have a baby and you wind up getting say, postpartum depression, I guarantee your vitamin D level is going to be below 30, because the baby got everything it needs and you don't have anything left.
"The reason why this is important, remember that everything that that child is, most of it is coming from you. You get some stuff from your dad, but it's really about you. And people always ask me this question, you know, when we talk about childhood cancers and this and that, and this kind of pisses a lot of parents off. Most kids that have problems, it stems from mom and dad. It's called transgenerational epigenetics. When I was a young doctor we didn't know anything about this. We didn't start knowing about this until some Duke studies in 2003. Now it's become the big deal, because I always get asked questions about you know childhood cancers. Childhood cancers always start in the mom's maternal DNA, meaning the mitochondrial DNA. And that can be passed on from great grandma, to grandma, to you. You put the engines in your children, not your husband.
"So that means if you optimize you, you can fix your kids. The problem is you need to know that you are the boss lady, and I mean that literally and figuratively. So if you know that your kid's having a problem, before you ever take the kid to the pediatrician, you better start asking questions like, 'What about our environment or what about my maternal side could this be linked to?' Because that is the place you need to go."
Dr. Jack Kruse with Katie Wells @ 44:35–46:36 (posted 2023-02-04)
Blue light destroys melatonin. Neural degeneration. Melatonin supplementation thins retina, harms central retinal pathway
Dr. Jack Kruse: "I mean I'm appalled as a neurosurgeon that parents see no problem with putting their kids on melatonin instead of, you know, getting off their lazy ass and reading a paper and say blue light destroys melatonin. […] Parents think, 'Well, if I destroy it with the iPad, he'll scream when he's in the restaurant. I want some peace in my life. I'll just give them 6 mg of melatonin at night.' That decision-making process is so bad, because you're setting that kid up for so many problems down the road. The problem is doctors are not doing a good job explaining to parents why that's a bad decision."
[…]
"But me as a neurosurgeon, and knowing what it does to the central retinal pathways into the brainstem, I think in the next 10 or 15 years you're going to find out that almost all cases of neural degeneration begin in the eye from this process we're talking about. And when these children grow up in their 30, 40, 50 years old and you're going to start seeing people who got these diseases, when I was a kid, at 70, 80 years old, but now it happens in 30 and 40 year olds, that's when people are going to get the wake up. Because it usually takes somebody getting a punch in the mouth before they actually change, because right now people cannot fathom that a change in screen time, a change in light, makes this big a difference.
[…]
"If you give your kids melatonin to help them sleep, it's because their mitochondria aren't making it. When you give the kid melatonin long enough you downregulate the melatonin production that they make in their own mitochondria. So you're turning off the machinery because you're getting an exogenous signal. So it ultimately makes your kid worse. What some of the effects that can happen to a child down the road? They can thin their retina, they can get retinal tears. They can develop really big problems with their central retinal pathways. Why? Because it turns out melatonin and dopamine regenerate all the photoreceptors in your eye. Does the pediatrician ever tell you that? No. Why? Because they're looking to give you the centralized answer to get you out of their office in 10 minutes, and that's it, you know, for your $25 copay. If you do your own homework you'll find that those answers are out there. So melatonin I've already told you is made in the mitochondria, so supplementing that is a big no-no."
Dr. Jack Kruse with Katie Wells @ 05:48–07:55 & 49:00–50:04 (posted 2023-02-04)
Lack of sunlight more harmful than smoking. Blue-lit screens destroy dopamine levels. School shootings. Children much more sensitive to non-native EMF. Giving a kid an iPhone is child abuse
Dr. Jack Kruse: "There's been six meta-analysis in the literature. The last one happened in 2016 in Sweden, and it basically said that lack of sunlight is more dangerous to your health than smoking cigarettes. So that should stop like every mother and go, 'Wait a minute. I clearly don't want my kid vaping or smoking, but you're telling me that this effect is as big as them doing that?' And see the problem is, keeping kids out of the sun doesn't have a negative connotation because of the dermatologists, the pediatricians, and it needs to.
"When you think about the flip side of this, that those kids have grown up, especially the kids today, have grown up in a world where everything is blue-lit, like blue-lit screens, digital babysitting, when families go and buy a kid iPhone, iPad, right off the beginning. If you put a spectroscope on that technology screen, you would not like what you'd see. And we now know the science is well developed that blue light causes breakdown in the retina. The breakdown in the retina leads to changes not only in the retina but also in the brain. So the number one thing that people probably want to hear about, when I was a kid, you know, we never had school shootings, we never had kids killing themselves left and right. Today it's an epidemic. What many of you may not know is that that's directly related to the amount of screen time that you have.
"And the reason for that is blue light destroys dopamine levels, and the dopamine is a chemical that I think most people have heard of. It's most widely associated with Parkinson's disease, but that's not the key thing. If you go and look at addictive behaviors for depression it's also associated with those. And the reason for that, in the pathway of your eye, you have a clock called the suprachiasmatic nucleus. And we now know in the last five, six years that those neurons stop at a place in the brainstem called the habenular nucleus. That habenular nucleus in that part of your hypothalamus actually controls your mood.
"I know moms have probably heard this as well. Children are much more sensitive to non-native EMF or fake light because their brains aren't fully myelinated. That's the reason why children can't rent cars or hotel rooms until they're 25 years old because their frontal lobes are not even myelinated. The flip side of that argument is they're much more sensitive to these frequencies. And parenting has changed so much in the last 30 years that people think it's A-OK to go give a kid an iPhone. And in my opinion that's child abuse. It's just like going into a Walmart and beating the snot out of your kid and everybody just standing there and looking at it. And the reason why is because it doesn't have a negative connotation, kind of like I told you about the sun.
"So when you add these two parts of the coin together too much artificial light at night, and no sun during the day, you set these kids up for an absolute train wreck in terms of their health."
Dr. Jack Kruse with Katie Wells @ 02:02–05:22 (posted 2023-02-04)
There is no detox from the vax. You have to redox, not detox
Dr. Jack Kruse: "There is no detox from the vax. […] We now know through a lot of the work of all the scientists that are on Twitter, you know, people that are linked to both me and Kevin McKernan that it's redox. You have to build your redox, you have to keep your immune system in tip-top shape, you have to keep the genome quiet, because we know there's intercalation across the board. You get intercalation just from the jab. You get intercalation also from COVID itself.
"And we know that the spike is persistent. We know the spike is a mitochondrial toxin. So anybody who tells you that you can get a detox protocol, they're fucking idiots. Why? Because your immune system is constantly making the spike. So that means that you need to have a different plan. And that different plan is you have to redox, not detox.
"And that means making sure that your natural killer cells are in tip-top shape, that you understand that where those cells come from, T-regulatory cells in your skin. Your skin needs to look like this [tanned]. You need to be in the sun all the time. You took the jab and you think you can live in Massachusetts or Ontario. Like, just say you took seven of them and you live in Melbourne, you're fucked. You can't stay there. You just can't. And if you do realize what's going to happen to you, you are likely, even if you don't get the turbo cancer, you're gonna get an autoimmune condition. You're going to get some other condition."
Dr. Jack Kruse with Brett Hanson @ 37:31–39:17 (posted 2025-09-02)
The skin acts like an accessory pituitary gland when exposed to UV. The skin takes its order from the light it is exposed to
Max Gulhane, MD: "I'm glad you brought up Dr. Slominski, and we can definitely talk about his work. He is a US, they call dermatopathologist over there, so I guess a dermatologist that is also anatomically trained in anatomic pathology, so diagnosing and then actually looking at skin biopsies to potentially diagnose skin malignancies. But his work, and that paper that you referenced, it's almost heresy within centralized dermatology, because it really illustrates how important ultraviolet light is in a physiological way. And maybe my biggest takeaway from that paper was that the skin is actually acting like an accessory pituitary gland, pretty much. It's almost acting like a central endocrine organ in and of itself. It's able to secrete a whole bunch of these peptide hormones that, again, normally the hypothalamus or the pituitary gland is secreting. But on exposure to ultraviolet light it can make these proenkephalin compounds, obviously the melanocortin and POMC compounds, and all these other products that are needed for proper endocrine function. And that is completely even separate from the circadian signaling role, and it's obviously separate from the infrared light interactions."
Cameron Borg: "Yeah, the skin is a compounding pharmacy, and it takes its orders from the spectrum that you give it. We have to start thinking of the skin the same way that we think of the brain. The skin is just an extension of the brain, and it takes its orders from what it's exposed to. And unfortunately for most people, what it's exposed to is absolute garbage, so it has no idea how to continue regulating in a way that's beneficial for the body."
Cameron Borg with Max Gulhane, MD @ 24:22–26:25 (posted 2025-03-10)