The skin acts like an accessory pituitary gland when exposed to UV. The skin takes its order from the light it is exposed to Max Gulhane, MD: "I'm glad you brought up Dr. Slominski, and we can definitely talk about his work. He is a US, they call dermatopathologist over there, so I guess a dermatologist that is also anatomically trained in anatomic pathology, so diagnosing and then actually looking at skin biopsies to potentially diagnose skin malignancies. But his work, and that paper that you referenced, it's almost heresy within centralized dermatology, because it really illustrates how important ultraviolet light is in a physiological way. And maybe my biggest takeaway from that paper was that the skin is actually acting like an accessory pituitary gland, pretty much. It's almost acting like a central endocrine organ in and of itself. It's able to secrete a whole bunch of these peptide hormones that, again, normally the hypothalamus or the pituitary gland is secreting. But on exposure to ultraviolet light it can make these proenkephalin compounds, obviously the melanocortin and POMC compounds, and all these other products that are needed for proper endocrine function. And that is completely even separate from the circadian signaling role, and it's obviously separate from the infrared light interactions." Cameron Borg: "Yeah, the skin is a compounding pharmacy, and it takes its orders from the spectrum that you give it. We have to start thinking of the skin the same way that we think of the brain. The skin is just an extension of the brain, and it takes its orders from what it's exposed to. And unfortunately for most people, what it's exposed to is absolute garbage, so it has no idea how to continue regulating in a way that's beneficial for the body." Cameron Borg with Max Gulhane, MD @ 24:22–26:25 (posted 2025-03-10)

People who use suncreen in Sweden have 10× the risk of malignant melanoma. You want to receive the most unaldulterated signal from your environment to prevent cancer Cameron Borg: "I mean another thing that's just an interesting point that Pelle Lindqvist told me was that, you know, I wasn't sure whether to believe him when he first told me. But I found the paper and sure enough, people who use sunscreen in Sweden have 10 times the risk of malignant melanoma compared to people who don't use sunscreen. He said it like it was nothing, but of course, no one knows about this here. You can buy 50+ sunscreen in every pharmacy here, even though you have less than fewer than 10 days a year with a high UV index. "So when you block the signal that's supposed to be coordinating the body, even if it seems like a relatively small thing, blocking a small signal can lead to large effects. It's the unfortunate thing (or perhaps the fortunate thing) about nonlinearity in the body is that small signals can have large effects, and vice versa. So yeah, just an interesting point about preventing cancer is you want to receive the most unadulterated signal from your environment as you possibly can, because that's ultimately the one that your body is looking for to coordinate itself in the best possible way." Cameron Borg with npub19yjldzc98lsesatjncxzgunm8xpdjsr5tva3sjc9ggyqsjh5hedst2unad @ 01:06:30–01:08:01 (posted 2025-03-10)

It takes investment and risking to have a great relationship. Give your heart to the other person. We all mess up. Talk about it to connect Dr. John Gottman: "well, I hate to tell you this, John, but I don't think it takes emotional maturity. And I don't really think it takes knowing yourself either. I think it takes really investment and risking, really giving everything you've got in this relationship, and through the relationship you get to know yourself better. I think you can be neurotic as hell and have a great relationship. You know, you hear a lot of people saying, 'Well, you have to really love yourself first.' I think that's bullshit, too. I really don't think it's true. I think what you have to do is really give your heart to this other person. And that takes really cherishing what you have in this relationship, and really maximizing what you see is your partner's positive qualities, and minimizing the negative. We all have drawbacks, we all have things that aren't perfect in our relationship. All of us are flawed. Nobody gets out of childhood without some crazy buttons, you know, that make us flawed human beings. "But what makes a relationship work is really emphasizing and cherishing what you have in this person, learning about, learning to understand this person. And how do we learn to understand another person? By screwing up communication and arguing and fighting. "I mean most couples, a lot of times reporters ask me, 'What a couples fight about?' And my answer is, 'Absolutely nothing.' They don't fight about topics; they fight about failures to connect emotionally. You know, like couples watching television, and they made popcorn, and she says, 'OK, let's watch television.' He says, 'OK, let me see what's on.' And she says, 'Yeah, why don't you leave it at that station. I like that. That's interesting.' He says, 'OK. I will, but let me see what else is on.' She says, 'No, leave it.' And he says, 'Fine. Have your way.' She says, 'Wait a minute, why did you say, why did you say it like that? It kind of hurt my feelings.' He says, 'I said fine cause you can always watch what you want to watch and we always do it your way.' She says, 'You know, I don't want to watch television with you at all now.' And then he walks out and slams the door saying, 'Fine.' "What did they argue about? It wasn't finances or sex or in-laws. They just failed to connect. And if they talk about what happened then they get closer and they understand. You know, and that's really the way it goes in a relationship. We all mess up, and then if we talk about it, then we understand each other better, and we learn to love each other better." Dr. John Gottman with John Hudson Messerall & Tama Fulton @ 13:47%%16:15

LDL cholesterol attaches to bacteria. Immune system oxidizes LDL. Low LDL associated with greater risk of coronary disease. People on statins at a higher risk for infection Nick Jikomes: "What is LDL cholesterol? […]" Uffe Ravnskov, MD, PhD: "LDL is used in the immune system. LDL is attached to all kinds of bacteria and microorganisms." […] "And when they have done that, the bacteria are covered with LDL, they are attached to each other and taken up by the monocytes. And monocytes, they inactivate all microorganisms by oxidation. "So oxidized LDL is a common finding in patients with myocardial infarction. And today, most researchers think that it is oxidized LDL which is dangerous, but it is not. Oxidized LDL is the result of their immune system. […] "And if there are too much they are added to each other and may occlude the arterioles, in particular the arterioles around the heart, because here the interstitial pressure is much higher than elsewhere." Nick Jikomes: "So you're saying if you have an infection, what can happen is the LDL particles cause all these bacteria to stick together and clump up. Then you get oxidized LDL. And if there's too many of them, so if you have a really bad infection, and you get a huge mass of these clumped together, that is what could clog an artery." Uffe Ravnskov, MD, PhD: "Yeah." Nick Jikomes: "[…] If you had healthy individuals, and one person had low LDL, would they be more susceptible to infection?" Uffe Ravnskov, MD, PhD: "Oh, yes. Many studies have also shown that those with low LDL are have a greater risk of coronary heart disease. I would add that the proof that LDL participate in immune system it has been documented in many many studies, in particular in animal studies. Some researchers have infected the animals with microorganisms which which kill them. But if they also include or inject human LDL, they survive. […] "The risk of infection was demonstrated already for century ago by American researchers. They found that patients who had suffered from a severe infection, they were more heterosclerotic than other people." Nick Jikomes: "People who had severe infections had worse atherosclerosis." Uffe Ravnskov, MD, PhD: "People who suffer or die from infectious diseases, they were more atherosclerotic than healthy people." Nick Jikomes: "So atherosclerosis has something to do with these infections." Uffe Ravnskov, MD, PhD: "Yes. This was demonstrated for about a 100 years ago." […] Nick Jikomes: "Because they lower LDL cholesterol, would that mean that people who are on statins, compared to people who are not on statins, are at higher risk for infection?" Uffe Ravnskov, MD, PhD: "Oh, yes." Uffe Ravnskov, MD, PhD with Nick Jikomes @ 10:10–16:15 (posted 2025-08-25)

Sunlight needed to make cholesterol sulfate. High LDL if cholesterol is not sulfated. Vitamin D needs to be sulfated to be transported. Sunlight for autism. Melatonin sulfate Stephanie Seneff, PhD: "Sunlight is super, super important. So I want to mention that sunlight exposure to the skin will help to improve the blood. The sulfate problem can be greatly improved through sunlight exposure, and of course, vitamin D. "The skin makes cholesterol sulfate in response to sunlight, in addition to vitamin D sulfate. And cholesterol sulfate is a way to distribute cholesterol throughout the body. When you can't add sulfate to cholesterol you get high blood cholesterol. You get the cholesterol hiding inside those lipid particles, the LDL, that ends up with putting you on a statin drug because you've got too much LDL. That's because the cholesterol is not sulfated, so it can't be transported freely; it has to go inside that LDL particle. That's what's causing the high LDL, I think, is because of the impaired sulfation of the cholesterol. And of course the vitamin D also needs sulfate to be transported. So those are big issues. "But the sunlight exposure does more than give you vitamin D, and I want to emphasize that. That's an important thing for autism, to get out in the sunlight without sunscreen, without sunglasses, to allow the sunlight to influence the pineal gland to make melatonin sulfate to help you sleep. So just want to end on that. I wanted to mention that because that's important." Stephanie Seneff, PhD with Logan Duvall @ 56:20–57:32 (posted 2024-01-08)

Pfizer's bait & switch. Pfizer intentionally deceived FDA. FDA says no worries. FDA covers for the deceiver. RICO Efrat Fenigson: "Just to be sure that I understood, [Pfizer] applied for their emergency authorization using the clean process on the left, while when they went to production, roll it out to the public, they changed everything. So they got an authorization for something completely different?" Kevin McKernan: "Yes." […] Kevin McKernan: "So, what is in this region of the plasmid that is now in the shots that wasn't in the trial? This map on the right is what they gave to the EMA. This is a plasmid map. What you're seeing in the plasmid map is they have highlighted this spike protein over there between noon and 6 o'clock in yellow. […] "You'll notice there's nothing in that region in gray. That's very, very bizarre for that to not be annotated at all. […] DNA annotation tools don't selectively annotate like this and leave a desert of information. They annotate everything at once, which means someone at Pfizer went in and manually erased the information about SV40. So they knew. They intentionally deceived the FDA, and wanted to hide this, which begs the question, why? What are they hiding? Efrat Fenigson: "And why did the FDA not ask? They're supposed to know that this is not supposed to be submitted this way." Kevin McKernan: "They should know. Yes. And when we complained about this, they came back saying, 'OK, we looked through the sequence, and lo and behold, you're right. There is SV40 stuff there that they didn't tell us about. They're supposed to, by law, annotate every single open reading frame, and every ORF. They didn't do it, but we still don't think it's meaningful.' [laughs]" Efrat Fenigson: "You're serious." Kevin McKernan: "They started making excuses for pharma." Efrat Fenigson: "Get out." Kevin McKernan: "This is where it gets really ugly is they moved from being deceived to then doing the job of covering for the deceiver." Efrat Fenigson: "Oh my god. Which I believe then shows that they're a part of it." Kevin McKernan: "They are." Efrat Fenigson: "Because if they weren't a part of it they would straight up come and say, 'You know what? We've been fooled. We've been manipulated and here's the truth.' But obviously they're not doing that." Kevin McKernan: "They're not doing that. in fact they're running cover for them, which makes them complicit in the crime. It starts bringing in RICO. This is a racketeering exercise now, because they've been made aware of this, and they're still running cover." npub1k8dxqxgnv2p6ymwkamfrx237qjct3zezsx2xevt6z6nzdgalff3qy94qte with npub1dg6es53r3hys9tk3n7aldgz4lx4ly8qu4zg468zwyl6smuhjjrvsnhsguz @ 57:11–57:30 & 59:37–01:02:00 (posted 2025-07-23) https://rumble.com/v6wkesy-kevin-draft.html?start=3431

Glyphosate binds tightly manganese. Lactobacillus critically depend on manganese. Manganese accumulating in the substantia nigra causes Parkinson's, affects ADHD and autism Stephanie Seneff, PhD: "I think glyphosate is messing up a lot of these minerals, including copper, manganese, magnesium, iron, and cobalt. All of them are going to be bound tightly to glyphosate. Manganese, for example, is one I've written about. I've written a whole paper on manganese and glyphosate, and I think it's connected to autism as well. Manganese and all of these minerals play an important role in the brain, of course, and you can have toxicity, as well as they're critical as nutrients. So they can be both essential and toxic at the same time, which is very, very tricky. "But in this paper on manganese I know more about manganese and copper, although I know copper is also a problem because I remember there's a copper, there's a protein, I won't remember the name of that, it's been a while, cupra- something or other, that binds like seven or eight copper atoms, and it actually is essential for the absorption of iron, I believe. This enzyme that has copper plays a role in getting iron into the body. And so we have actually an epidemic in iron deficiency and iron toxicity at the same time right now, and I think that's because glyphosate messing up the iron. "The body has, again, sophisticated mechanisms for sort of trapping these minerals in certain biological chelators and then escorting them across the gut barrier, delivering them safely to cells. The cells have ways of taking them and storing them safely, you know, all of this mechanism that's in place to distribute them appropriately to where they need to go, and to make them available to play their role in some enzyme that depends upon them. Glyphosate is just messing all of that up by binding very tightly. "So it binds very tightly to the manganese, which prevents the bacteria, the lactobacillus, critically depend on manganese. They're really very interesting that way. They don't really care about iron at all, but they really care about manganese. Glyphosate keeps the manganese away from them, and then the lactobacillus get sick. And so they become reduced in numbers, and hen these pathogens take over the gut gets completely imbalanced with regard to which you know which microbes are living there. And then glyphosate grabs onto the manganese and carries it to the liver, and then the liver now has this manganese. Normally the liver sends a manganese back to the gut attached to bile acids, and then it gets distributed throughout the body via the blood system. But the liver can't do that because the glyphosate's hanging on to the maganese, and the manganese ends up being stored in the liver and in the gallbladder. "And then the only way to get rid of the manganese is to ship it on nerve fibers up to the brain. And manganese travels very well on nerve fibers which is very interesting it's a very interesting mineral. And so the manganese travels on the nerve fibers up to the brain centers. For example, the Parkinson's disease, you know, it it accumulates in the substantia nigra, which is the place where that's associated with Parkinson's damage to the substantia nigra. So the manganese ends up accumulating in the substantia nigra, and that can cause Parkinson's disease. "And this is something that's well known with welders. Welders are releasing a lot of manganese dust. Then they breath it into the nose, and then it travels along the nerve fibers that connect the nose to the brain center, and ends up causing a Parkinson's-like syndrome for welders. If they're exposed to this manganese in the dust, they end up with Parkinson's disease, because again of the manganese getting accumulating in those brain centers and causing damage. So I think, you know, either coming on the nerve fibers from the gut, or coming on the nerve fibers from the nose, the same thing you end up with. I think it's going to affect things like ADHD and autism as well." Stephanie Seneff, PhD with Logan Duvall @ 34:48–38:30 (posted 2024-01-08)

Gut microbes produce melatonin low in deuterium, excellent for mitochondria. OTOH, melatonin supplements are not low deuterium Stephanie Seneff, PhD: "I'd like to talk about melatonin because that's extremely interesting. In fact, there's a brand new paper, 2023, just came out. I was thrilled to see that, because it showed that glyphosate suppressed melatonin in rats, 43% reduction of melatonin in the blood samples in these rats. I think that may be a crucial, crucial aspect of glyphosate's toxicity. "And melatonin is very interesting because it comes from serotonin. Serotonin also comes from the shikimate pathway. So the serotonin is going to be, that's a neurotransmitter, it's going to be suppressed. Melatonin is serotonin with low deuterium hydrogens packed on top of it, because it puts a methyl group and an acetyl group onto the serotonin molecule to make melatonin. Both the acetyl and the methyl come from those gut microbes and from that hydrogen gas. You can trace them all the way back to say melatonin is going to be a fantastic deliverer of low deuterium hydrogen to the mitochondria. And melatonin has huge, huge list of beneficial elements to it. I mean, it's a wonderful antioxidant, it binds metals, it helps the mitochondria. I mean there's huge numbers of papers that say how wonderful melatonin is. "But if you take supplemental melatonin you're not going to have that benefit. This is something I like people to realize the problem. A big problem with supplements is that most of these supplements that are pure molecules are made in the chemistry lab. When you make them in the chemistry lab you have no clue about giving them low deuterium. So when you take a melatonin supplement you're taking a version of melatonin that's not healthy. And then your body's going to think that it is, and it's going to treat it as if it's providing low deuterium hydrogen, but it's not. So I think that can backfire if you take a lot of melatonin supplements." […] Logan Duvall: "Is there a bioidentical melatonin that you know of?" "Now, that's a good question. Yeah, it might be that there are sources of melatonin. I don't know about melatonin particularly, but I know a lot of the amino acids are made in the chemistry lab. It could be that melatonin is processed through some, you know, bacteria, harvested from bacteria, something like that. You'd have to look up to see how melatonin is produced." Stephanie Seneff, PhD with Logan Duvall @ 30:15–32:02 & 32:52–33:22 (posted 2024-01-08)

Full remission from primary hypothyroid and Hashimoto's after staying in Costa Rica. Hypothyroidism and autism. Building Becker's regenerative current using the light in Costa Rica Dr. Brandon Crawford: "I've always had primary hypothyroid and Hashimoto's. When I was in Costa Rica, and literally every day we were on the beach for hours. We were typically naked or very little clothes on the beach. And then if we weren't on the beach we were running around hiking in the jungle, etc. I went into full remission." […] Dr. Jack Kruse: "I'm glad you brought this up, because this is a beautiful tie-in to the story that you really wanted to talk to me about, which is autism. […] "Hypothyroidism is a preconditioned state. If a woman has it that she's going to have an autistic baby. Why? Did you know that hypothyroidism is associated with demyelination? […] Dr. Jack Kruse: "Absolutely true. There's papers out about it. So, when you're already in a demyelinated state, do you think that your stem cells are not picking up that programming? The answer is yes. Now, here's the other interesting thing is T3 is needed for neurologic function in humans. "What's the other big link is everybody that has hypothyroidism has a huge problem handling iron. Wow. Now doesn't that begin to fit with what we just talked about autism? "Remember, this is a totally different disease, and now you just brought this in. The reason I'm glad you did this because this is the spectrum of chronic medical conditions. When you improve this, you can avoid the autism. Why? Because can you give a kid an injection if they have proper neurulation? Yes. I know this is going to offend many kids and families that have autism. It's true. "There are kids out there that took all these jabs and didn't get it, and the reason why is because the process in them wasn't broken. But I can tell you that number is really, really small. Back in the 70s, 80s the number was huge. Now it's changed. Why? Because our environment now is filled with blue light. Our environment is filled with all the things that Becker warned us about. So what does that do? it's fundamentally changed the oxidation state of iron. "[…] My Robins Pathology book from 1986 that's right on that shelf, in that book there's a line in a paragraph that says that Hashimoto's thyroiditis is extremely rare cause of hypothyroidism. This is 1986! Today, it's the number one cause of thyroid disease. "You have to realize that hypothyroidism and autism should be discussed all the time. The fact that you brought it up is a beautiful thing, because it explains exactly what I'm trying to share with you. The lack of control of oxygen is tied to the bad biophysics of iron. And it turns out hypothyroidism is one of the key things to study to understand truly what's happening with people and kids that have autism. And you'll begin to find out that that alters their metabolic rate. I think you know this that anybody who's got hypothyroidism has a different metabolic rate. What does that mean in the decentralized framework that I just talked to you about? It means that the UPE frequency and spectra is different. So it's not the same. "So why would you ever expect anybody to not have a problem from an epigenetic standpoint who's got this disease? And the reason I love what you just said is because you just proved my point, that if you go to a place like Costa Rica at the 9th north latitude, you're constantly around UV and IR light which does what? Renovates the heme proteins and makes POMC and α-MSH. You just built Becker's regenerative current. So what did you do? "You fixed this problem completely. And you did it with light. No, you didn't do it with anything else at all. In other words, this is offensive to the big pharma answer, because they don't want to hear this story, Brandon. They don't want Brandon and Uncle Jack talking about this and they certainly do not want us talking about this when we're talking about autism." Dr. Jack Kruse with Dr. Brandon Crawford @ 52:14–56:49 (posted 2025-06-06)

Type 1 diabetes rates by latitude. Multiple Sclerosis prevalence by latitude. UV light strength. Our bodies run at a deficit without sun Cameron Borg: "Now I want to show you some of my favorite statistics ever. This is the association between UVB radiation, vitamin D status, and incidence of type 1 diabetes, so autoimmune diabetes. "Now this is the most perfect depiction of the effects of high energy photons on disease processes. So you can see where it's at the lowest we're on the Equator, so zero. The further away you get from the equator, either south or north, the more you get type 1 diabetes in the population. "Now to my knowledge, this hasn't been settled, but it looks to be not a vitamin D-dependent process. So again, if you give people vitamin D supplements it doesn't prevent them from getting type 1 diabetes. So again, there's something else about the sun that is providing protection from these types of conditions. "This is multiple sclerosis risk plotted by latitude. Again, we see all there's essentially no MS on the equator it doesn't exist. It's actually quite remarkable the associations that you get here. It's clear as day. And this is known for sure that this is not a vitamin D-dependent process. The studies have been done. This has nothing to do with vitamin D. There is something else about UV light that is preventing the incidence of MS when you get closer to the Equator. "Unfortunately vitamin D research has monopolized the research into the effects of sunlight. Everyone just thinks everything has to do with vitamin D. It's not. And unfortunately so much has gone into vitamin D when I again it's just such a narrow slice of what's actually happening. And we know that MS is not a vitamin D-dependent incidence. It has to do with something else that's going on with UV light, and we don't know what that is. Unfortunately, we're probably not even looking in the right places because vitamin D research takes all the funding money. […] "But you know this begs the question could our mass migration indoors over the last century be a primary contributor to chronic disease? I'm going to try and paint the picture that I think it is. So all life evolved with the _expectation_, I think that word is really important, our biological system expects that sunlight and the energy therein is available to use every single day. Every single day. Whether it's cloudy, most of that light is coming through the clouds, but we can't see it. So our bodies have specifically evolved expecting that that's there, because why wouldn't it evolve to expect that that light's going to be there. But when we move inside, and we live inside all days, those expectations are not met. And when those expectations are not met the body runs at a deficit, and that's just the way it is. There's really no way around that." Cameron Borg @ 20:58–24:21 (posted 2025-01-17)

Why some OLED phones are causing eye strain and headaches Tristan Scott: "Yeah. We're releasing a flicker in-depth guide article next week. […] Basically, the way that we control brightness on modern electronic devices […] is by switching the LED on and off at varying rates. "So, if you want a super low brightness screen output in terms of luminance, it's actually just going to be off for longer. So, instead of it being lower current, you're just switching on and off, on and off, and at low brightness, the off time is increased. It's called pulse-width modulation. […] We used to use them in our chip designs and now I'm like, 'Oh, that's how they control LEDs as well. That's terrible.' And my concussion and the symptoms I get, I always was so much more sensitive to my phone. And I thought it was the light. I thought it was the form factor. "But I recently switched to an iPhone 11, which is the last iPhone that doesn't use PWM, because it's a LCD display instead of an OLED display. […] It just uses DC dimming, which is actually changing the voltage of the current across the diode. And I can actually look at my phone like all day now. I mean, it's not ideal. I still get like sucked in, and the form factor is not great. "But I now look at my iPhone 13 and I get a headache in 5 minutes. […] And the reason why your phone feels so much worse than everything else, if you have a iPhone 12 or later, […] they're switching at like 240 Hz or 480 Hz typically if they're OLED, like newer iPhones, Google Pixel, and the lower the frequency is, the actually worse it is, because it's still above where your brain can perceive it visually, but it feels it, regardless of being able to see it. "They have quite literally an index. The Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, IEEE, this is not some like woo woo thing. It's agreed upon that flickering LEDs causes eye strain. It causes migraines, headaches, aggravates symptoms in ASD children, panic attacks, anxiety. This is like it's not a debate. This has been written and agreed upon in the engineering literature. They have something called a flicker index. […] "The iPhone SE was another one that people loved because it was like basic and more friendly on the eyes. And then they just discontinued it. Even though people in many forums have said like, 'Don't get rid of your only like DC dimming line that's left.' There's other phone companies in Asia coming out that are specifically higher PWM frequencies to be more eye friendly. So it's not like this isn't known." npub1yd2h2lrwchshvm46jq7auh65tjkxmgnapkavh7tjtqq07kknupxsa980tv with Dr. Alexis Cowan @ 01:19:28–01:22:55 & 01:24:33–01:24:58 (posted 2025-07-07)

Six-fold rise in melanoma diagnosis over last 40 years. Overdiagnosis. No prize for missing one. Drive for revenue maximization. An epidemic created by dermatologists Richard Weller: "Now there's a difference in melanoma diagnosis and melanoma death. Melanoma death is a very robust endpoint. You've had a serious melanoma, it is fatal. […] Adewole Adamson, an American dermatologist down in Texas, had a paper in the New England Journal about two years ago where he looked at […] the number of melanomas, predominantly superficial spreading melanomas, diagnosed in America now are six times as many as there were 40 years ago, so a six-fold rise. […] "He finds there's no correlation whatsoever between how much sunlight there is where you live and your risk of melanoma. But he finds there is an absolutely tight, straight-line relationship between access to a dermatologist, how many dermatologists there are, how many biopsies are done. Basically it's overdiagnosis. "They took microscope slides from 40 years ago which had been some diagnosed as melanoma, some diagnosed as funny mole, dysplastic nevus, not melanoma, and put them in front of pathologists today. And a significant number of those biopsies that were diagnosed as not a melanoma 40 years ago were diagnosed as melanoma when being looked at pathologist by now. […] "The problem with diagnosis of melanoma is it is dermatologist looks at it saying, 'Yeah, it looks like a melanoma.' That's it. Pathologist, you do a biopsy, put it on a slide. Pathologist looks at it and goes, 'Yeah, looks like a melanoma.' So the whole thing is based on an impression. […] "The other thing about melanoma diagnosis there are no prizes for missing one. If you say, 'It looks like a funny mole,' and it turns out to be melanoma and it kills them, that is the end of your career, or it's a very expensive mistake. If you say, and it is a harmless mole, 'Oh, it's a melanoma,' and you cut it out, you then have an incredibly grateful patient. 'My god, I had a melanoma. My life has been saved!' even if the reality of the matter is they never had a melanoma, it was just a mole, it was never going to do anything. So the whole diagnostic shift, it's not malicious, but it's moving one one way. "Where it is wrong is in America. There's been a big commercial change in melanoma practice in the last 40 years. In the US, venture capitalists have bought up dermatology practices, and they have bought up pathologists, and they've said revenue maximization now, so I want dermatologists to do more biopsies, a chargeable event, to feed biopsies to pathologists, a chargeable event, who can feed diagnosis. . . So there's been this financial pressure for dermatologists to do more, see more, do more biopsies. […] "There has been no change in deaths. […] I don't think dermatologists are chasing an epidemic; I think there is a strong chance here that dermatologists are creating an epidemic. I think overdiagnosis to me strikes me as a much more likely than factors we haven't considered leading to more melanoma. I don't think we've necessarily got more melanoma." Prof. Richard Weller with Max Gulhane, MD @ 56:00–01:01:54 (posted 2024-03-02)

The American Academy of Pediatrics is really a big pharma lobbyist, money laundering, influence laundering, scheme and scam Robert Barnes: "The American Academy of Pediatrics, well, is supposed to be representing children's doctors in America, has become a captive tool of big pharma. They've been receiving, now they are, for example, right now suing Robert Kennedy to try to force parents to have to give certain vaccines, so-called vaccines, to their children against their informed consent. "Robert Kennedy is saying that should not be done against their informed consent and is not recommending it for the COVID vaccine for children, unless the child is uniquely vulnerable to COVID, because it is seen as having more risk than reward based on the available data, including over 180 scientific and medical studies on the subject. "AAP is suing him to try to force it back in. And that is because, in part, the AAP is really a big pharma lobbyist in disguise. And what shocked some people is that they get money from the government, state and federal government, is being given money to then turn around and lobby the government on behalf of big pharma. Elon Musk called this the George Soros scam. He goes, what it is, is you figure out you can bribe a government official to give you a hundred X rate of your bribe, and then you can turn around and use that to lobby everybody else on government at scale. And he goes, you know, it is a money laundering, influence laundering, scheme and scam. And that is what appears to me, the AAP is also doing." Robert Barnes with Viva Frei @ 01:23:38%%01:25:03 (posted 2025-08-17) https://rumble.com/v6xp9ue-ep.-277-russia-peace-talks-trump-d.c.-takeover-leads-to-lawsuit-heat-wave-l.html?start=5018

The problems with epidemiology. You just can't peanut butter everything into a normal distribution John Beaudoin: "They try to put everything in a unimodal, uh, one mode. Everybody knows what a bell curve is, right? One mode. So the way I explain part of the problems with epidemiologists is they talk about p-values and confidence intervals. It's all based on a bell curve and a normal distribution. "Male cancers I use as an example. Right? Testicular cancer, mean age is 30. You get it from like 18 to 40. You're not going to get it after 40. That's testicular. "Prostate cancer, you're not going to even look at it until 50, and even then it's very few. It goes up with age. "You have two different modes [holds up both hands], a mean of 30 [holds up only left hand] and a mean of, say, 70 [holds up right hand]. And in between there, 40 to 50, there's a very low probability you're going to have either one. But if you take all the data, you throw it in a pool and you say, 'Give me the mean,' which is generally the most likely that is going to occur, and say, 'Oh, it's 50. Male cancer is 50.' Like, no, that's very low probability of either one because you've got a bimodal distribution [holds up both hands]. "These are the problems with epidemiology, where they don't look at confounding variables, they don't look at multiple things like that, and probability distribution functions. You just can't peanut butter everything into a normal distribution. It's wrong." John Beaudoin with Dr. Sherri Tenpenny @ 59:39–01:01:04 (streamed 2025-06-02) https://rumble.com/v6u61ln-this-week-with-dr.t-with-special-guest-john-beaudoin.html?start=3579

You're supposed to be out in nature. A/C is a problem Dr. Jack Kruse: "Cold also has another effect. Remember I told you about Becker's work that we worked via semiconduction. Most people don't understand this. […] Semiconductive currents work with cold better. So, this is the reason why when your iPhone gets the temperature warning, when you put it on the hood of your Mercedes-Benz, you put it right in the freezer and it works right away. "You actually work the same way. You don't understand this because you say, 'But Jack, when I'm in the cold, you know, I have to put a jacket on this and that.' Well, if you remember Darwin's trip on the Beagle, he found the people at Tierra del Fuego naked outside in temperatures that he couldn't believe, and they were able to do it. They're they're the last wild people that were on the planet in the 1850s and 1860s. "So, we have the belief that you can't do that. Like, for example, where you live in London, you know, I'd go there in sometimes July and see people walking around in down jackets, which is a joke because you're not supposed to do that. You're supposed to be out in nature. "The corollary to that is the United States, you probably have seen when you go there, we have fucking A/C on everywhere. A/C is a problem. Why? What controls circadian biology? Light, dark, and temperature. So guess what? Nature is telegraphing you. These three metrics are really important for you to understand." Dr. Jack Kruse with Archie @ 02:27:07–02:28:37 (posted 2025-08-08)

Functional medicine doctors bankrupt people with useless tests. Ordering a test and not knowing what it means. They want to keep testing you Dr. Jack Kruse: "Functional medicine doctors are the biggest criminals in medicine. They're bigger than the allopathic doctors. Why? Because they bankrupt people using all these useless tests. And guess what? If you sit them down and say, 'OK, let's have a discussion about the GOE and how myelin and microtubules fit,' they're going to be like, 'Bidee, bidee, bidee, That's all, Folks!' In other words, they have no earthly idea, Doug, how this works. So think about it. Why would you ever give somebody the power to order hundreds of thousands of dollars of tests on you? "In fact, I did a consult right before you this morning where a lady spent tons of money, never got any answers. She's got a pretty significant problem. And when I told her what the issue was, she was stunned. "Yesterday, I had an in-person consult, first one. His main problem, literally we solved in five minutes, but what was the problem? Again, a testing problem: that the doctor ordered a test and had no earthly idea what the test meant. And then he got pushed in the centralized care path, you know, to get on interferon and this and that, when if he had a doctor that really understood what was going on, literally you could change the mix. "And here's the irony that happened in this consult, why I'm telling you this. I had Jeremy Franco here who works for me here in El Salvador. His sister's a doctor in Guatemala. We called his sister up during the consult while he was sitting here. I said, 'Is this available in Guatemala or El Salvador to get this test done?' Because it's something that I don't normally do. "And she goes, 'Yeah.' And she goes, 'Not only that, we have the cure for this problem to make it go completely away.' And I looked at him and I said, 'Do you understand now why functional medicine failed you?' "And he goes, 'Why didn't they tell me this?' I said, 'Because they want to keep testing you.' I want to keep selling you supplements. They want to keep telling you, like Thomas Seyfried does, 'Oh, if you have cancer or you have a premalignant condition, just eat a ketogenic diet.' "But they never tell you that AM sunlight is the key to the ketogenic diet. Because you can't use a TCA cycle if you're eating fat. That's the kind of stuff that I think is really important. And I like teaching this stuff because I think it's so rudimentary and so basic." Dr. Jack Kruse with Doug Sandquist, DDS @ 33:09–35:27 (posted 2025-07-25)

Breathing exercises should be something everybody does with apnea when they're kids Dr. Jack Kruse: "People begin to realize that some of the stuff, like Erwin Le Corre teaches people about breathing. Breathing exercises should be something everybody does with apnea when they're kids. Like you got a malocclusion, You should be doing apnea-level exercises for your kids. "Instead of taking your kids, I don't know, to soccer practice to get a stupid trophy, how about you do something that's worthwhile so you can save them from either a lifelong apnea or cardiac risk or, you know, $10,000 worth of dental work? […] "The science is on your side. Like evolutionary biology, the GOE. […] "And then you start to see our modern epidemics in not only in dentistry, but in medicine, there's a lot of tie-in. Like they're cross-linked, and you begin to see why people are having problems. And then when you put the technology and the cell phones in front of these kids, but what's just happening, you're actually making this worse." Dr. Jack Kruse with Doug Sandquist, DDS @ 41:47–43:23 (posted 2025-07-25)

If you don't get in the sun your teeth are going to fall apart. Dentin can be regenerated Dr. Jack Kruse: "We're all taught that dental decay is a function of carbohydrates. That's a half truth. The real truth is if you don't get in the sun, your teeth are going to fall apart. The thing is, when's the last time any dentist ever told a parent the real reason your kid's teeth are falling apart? Yeah, putting the bottle in their mouth is a bad thing, but why is your kids vitamin D level nine? "And you know what you'll be amazed to find if you're a dentist? Go and look at all these new dentitions that don't have anything but sealants in it, and then check their vitamin D level. You might be shocked to find out that people that have the best teeth have also the highest levels of vitamin D. What does it tell you? Remember, your teeth are basically neuroectodermal-derived things. Vitamin D controls the neuroectoderm. "So does vitamin A. Vitamin A is the blue light part of the story, and vitamin D is the UV violet part. How about you get people out? Dentin really responds to the near infrared and red. That's the reason why those red lasers show that dentin can be regenerated. "Well, if you got into a pulp chamber, don't you think it would be nice to have a special red laser light there instead of using Ketac cement, or whatever the hell you guys do now, or send it to the endodontist to pull the nerve out. I mean, what does Becker say about pulling the nerve out? You got no DC electric current in the tooth. Is that, you got any chance for regeneration? Doug Sandquist: "No." Dr. Jack Kruse: "What does that do to trigeminal signaling, you know, in the mandibular division? We don't know, but I guarantee it's UPEs." Dr. Jack Kruse with Doug Sandquist, DDS @ 36:05–37:37 (posted 2025-07-25)

It would destroy the CPAP industry. When you give a broken mitochondria more oxygen, you're killing people Doug Sandquist, DDS: "So I had another question from your, was it Jikomes, the GOE podcast, that was revolutionary for me. But so the idea between Fe at +2 and Fe at +3, so methemoglobin, right? So in researching that, normal humans have 1 to 2% methemoglobin normally, right? And then up to 10% can be imperceptible. Like, the human won't know that they have methemoglobinemia, right?" Dr. Jack Kruse: "Most people don't know." Doug Sandquist, DDS: "Yeah. So if we're doing a sleep study, or we're doing a sleep screen, or somebody's sticking a pulse ox on their finger, a regular pulse ox on their finger, and it says they're at 89. And so you now determine they're hypoxic. And you have not checked their methemoglobin." Dr. Jack Kruse: "You've committed malpractice." Doug Sandquist, DDS: "So why don't sleep centers or sleep screens use CO-oxymeters? I know they're $1,000, but they're not. . ." Dr. Jack Kruse: "May I tell you why?" Doug Sandquist, DDS: "I know the answer, but go ahead." Dr. Jack Kruse: "Incentives dictate outcomes." Doug Sandquist, DDS: "Yeah." Dr. Jack Kruse: "Do they really want to solve the problem?" Doug Sandquist, DDS: "It would crush, it would destroy the CPAP industry, right? I mean, that's really it." Dr. Jack Kruse: "Guess what? The CPAP industry has been based on all the stuff that you used to believe that, 'Oh, it's a lack of oxygen.'" Doug Sandquist, DDS: "Right." Dr. Jack Kruse: "No, it's a broken mitochondria. And when you give a broken mitochondria more oxygen, you're killing people." Doug Sandquist, DDS: "Right." Dr. Jack Kruse with Doug Sandquist, DDS @ 47:56–49:21 (posted 2025-07-25)

Ninth Circuit Ruling: no need to prove it will be good for your health, no bodily autonomy anymore Viva Frei: "All right now the other case which was also one that I know you don't like. This was a bad vax decision which. . ." Robert Barnes: "Oh, it was horrendous." Viva Frei: "Yeah, again another case where if you don't know the answer already you might get misled by some reporting. It did not it basically it ratified Jacobson by stating that. . ." Robert Barnes: "It went further than Jacobson." Viva Frei: ". . . that you didn't even need to know that it was actually safe and effective, effectively, but you need to you need to have had good reason to think at the time that it would save. . ." Robert Barnes: "That it would just be 'good.' That's it. This was the vaccine mandate LA County imposed, went up to the Ninth Circuit. Ninth Circuit originally ruled that they effectively established a factual basis that if this wasn't in fact a vaccine even under Jacobson, then they have a right to prove that, and should go to trial, should go to discovery. The whole en banc Ninth Circuit grab the case. They almost never grab cases, and yet en banc circuit grabs the case. Why do they grab it? "First say it's not moot, even though there's no vaccine mandate currently pending, which in every other context they scream is moot when they when they want to escape judgment. And then they said as long as that you can be forced to take a vaccine, as long as the politician at the time thought it might be beneficial to public health, even if it's not a vaccine, it's not safe, and it's not effective. "I mean they took Jacobson to the most extreme eugenics determination that it could go, Janet Jacobson being the foundation of the trilogy of infamy of American law. Jacobson was the sole case cited for Buck v. Bell that authorized forced sterilizations in America and eugenics in America, the number one favorite case of Adolf Hitler, only had one case to rely on: Buck v. Bell, Jacobson. "And then that those two decisions led to Korematsu, which said in the name of an 'emergency' you could take away every right you have: your right of speech, your right of expression, your right of press, your right of association, your right of religion, your right of self defense, your right to keep your property, your right to your privacy, your right to trial by jury, your right to due process of law, your right to your property. All of it could be taken away, as long as there was an 'emergency' that could justify it, in that case the Japanese detention camps. The report is the one that greenlit that. "Now they've gone further. They've said as long as they have a rational basis, they can force you to take whatever they want you to do, whatever they want to do. That's it. And the rational basis can be, 'We just think it'll be good for your health.' They don't have to prove it will be good for your health, they don't have to be right that it's good for your health, they can just believe it's good for your health. And as long as they believe it's a 'net good' for you, they can take away any right you want. That's what the Ninth Circuit just said. You have no bodily autonomy anymore in America after this decision." Viva Frei & Robert Barnes @ 01:47:00%%01:49:45 (posted 2025-08-03) https://rumble.com/v6x2ou2-ep.-275-maxwells-plea-deal-argument-rogue-judges-nuclear-war-trans-lawsuits.html?start=6420