You can just prove the reimann hypothesis

The Reimann Hypothesis is proved now.

Clay Mathematics Institute

Riemann Hypothesis - Clay Mathematics Institute

The prime number theorem determines the average distribution of the primes. The Riemann hypothesis tells us about the deviation from the average. F...

GM After 164 years, my colleague released a public, timestamped spectral proof of the Riemann Hypothesis. Built from a double conical helix geometry, it defines a self-adjoint operator τ on L²(ℝ) whose spectrum exactly matches the nontrivial zeros of ζ(s). If you or anyone you know is interested in trying to poke holes in it feel free with any LLM you'd like. This is proved in a way that has never been thought of or attempted or submitted prior. It has been shared with several institutions in preparationfor the clay institute millenium evaluation. @Gigi @fiatjaf @Michael Dunworth!!!!! @Jeff Booth @DETERMINISTIC OPTIMISM 🌞 @Marty Bent @ODELL https://open.substack.com/pub/bridgerll/p/i-solved-the-riemann-hypothesis-using?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=1vnmlt

GM This is the birds eye view of the reimann zeta function. It's depicting a cross section of an invisible, probabilistic shape. The shape is determined by the non critical zeros. Define where they all are and it's (RH)

i want to take @Nik Bhatia Bitcoin class final exam and see how i do.

The Reimann Hypothesis will ve solved with complex geometry. Using analytics and data is useful but when dealing with infinity, even a few trillion anecdotes don't matter.

The Reimann Hypothesis is true. If you can prove it you get $1m (from CI). It's the longest standing millenium math problem based on work prolosed from Reimann picked up from Gauss and Euler. The problem is very interesting because its related to the distribution of prime numbers. Something Gauss could never prove. We can only guess how many prime # are between any two limits (with pretty good accuracy) but if the reimann hypothesis is true we can tell exactly how many. It's related to Crytography. Lots of math is already built with the assumption it is true. Disproving it would be as simple as finding a non trivial zero that doesn't lie on the critical line (midpoint of critical strip x=1/2) Every NT-zero lies on the critical line (x = 1/2). Imo. The zeta function is telling you something when it produces a zero. Trillions of non trival zeros have been found on the critical line analytically. All you have to do to prove it is: find a way to describe where ALL the critical zeros are. Finding the 1st few trillion doesn't matter when there is infinity of them. To find the shape of the object mathematically would prove it one way or another. My guess is it will be solved with geometry. And that's where I'm studying. The object itself isn't rigid, it's probabilistic. To find its shape is like shooting a paintball at an invisible object until you can make it out. The paintballs being critical zeros. The fx's graph is a shadow of the object. You can only go so far with analytic continuation. Zero outputs from the fx can be imagined as a point in space where the energy is zero. Like two dissonate waves colliding making a shape from where the waves cancel and energy is zero. The still points on a vibrating membrane. Bottom of the sin wave. I think it gets proven true before 2040.

Clay Mathematics Institute

Riemann Hypothesis - Clay Mathematics Institute

The prime number theorem determines the average distribution of the primes. The Riemann hypothesis tells us about the deviation from the average. F...