looking ≠ seeing

𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚢𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚒𝚜 𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚝𝚘𝚛𝚢 Bitcoin’s extreme divisibility is NOT priced in and most probably it can NOT be priced in. Once Sats become the oil of the global AI engine, it’s another new world order. Price is currently set by the interaction of demand & supply from human actors and manipulated by frontmen and puppets. Can you imagine what happens once the demand is driven by the essential, non-negotiable utility of autonomous AI agents? The price required to throttle that utility demand (the "market clearing price") will be exponentially higher than the current human-speculation ceiling. Sonner than later, the value of Bitcoin will no longer be measured by its price relative to the USD, but by the unquantifiable utility floor required to power the entire global autonomous AI economy. Contrary to Gold, that functions mainly as a hedge for humans, Bitcoin will soon be the non-negotiable global utility resource for AI. The corrupted legacy financial complex are running a sophisticated scheme to steal Bitcoin, but they "can't manipulate the long-term price" Imagine this: For an autonomous AI agent (and there will be billions of them) purchasing 21 milliseconds of compute time, the cost would be a fixed number of Sats, guaranteed to remain stable for the years to come. • Exponential change is ahead us, #HODL onto your hats fellas & stack Self Custody Sats. The Dollar is The Noise. (The cake i$ a lie)

The pace of #change today is slower than it will ever be for the rest of your #life.

🥜

There are just four circles. They don't touch each other #illusionstr

THE #BITCOIN #HODL MANIFESTO

The HODLer Manifesto

𝔑𝔬𝔱 𝔞𝔩𝔩 𝔱𝔥𝔬𝔰𝔢 𝔴𝔥𝔬 𝔴𝔞𝔫𝔡𝔢𝔯 𝔞𝔯𝔢 𝔩𝔬𝔰𝔱.

🄲🅁🄴🄰🅃🄴🅆🄰🅅🄴🅂 🄽🄾🅃🅁🄸🄿🄿🄻🄴🅂 🌊

WELCOME TO #NOSTR. FORGET ABOUT #SOCIALMEDIA #FOMO. WELCOME #JOMO. #grownostr

𝙳𝚘𝚗'𝚝 𝚙𝚕𝚊𝚗 𝚝𝚘𝚘 𝚖𝚞𝚌𝚑. 𝚃𝚑𝚎 𝚍𝚎𝚝𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚒𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗… #MondayMotivation

#Bitcoin + #growNostr

😱 Be not afraid of growing slowly, be afraid only of standing still…

“75% likelihood that #Bitcoin price will exceed US $4.81 million by April 2036” ACADEMIC RESEARCH: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5386623

Sad but True

在边缘处思考

𝙲𝚑𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚎 𝙰𝚞𝚝𝚑𝚘𝚛𝚒𝚝𝚢: 𝙱𝚎 𝚄𝚗𝚐𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚗𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚎.

ꜱᴇɪᴢᴇ ᴛʜᴇ ɴᴏᴡstr ✨

* AI Companies as the New Feudal Lords Yanis Varoufakis's concept of #technofeudalism posits that contemporary economic structures resemble feudal systems, particularly with regard to power dynamics. In this framework, AI companies like OpenAI can be likened to feudal lords in several key ways: 1. Concentration of Power Economic Control Much like feudal lords controlled land and resources, AI companies wield significant influence over data, algorithms, and technological infrastructure. This concentration allows them to dictate the terms of engagement in various sectors. Access and Influence AI platforms have access to vast amounts of data, akin to land ownership in feudal times. This data grants them the ability to shape market trends, consumer behavior, and even public discourse, positioning them as gatekeepers of information. wealth disparities. 2. Dependency on Technology Serfdom of the Digital Age Just as peasants were dependent on feudal lords for their livelihoods, individuals and businesses increasingly rely on AI services for daily operations. This dependency can lead to diminished autonomy, as companies monopolize essential technological tools. Limited Choices The dominance of a few AI companies creates a monopoly-like environment where options become limited, forcing users into compliance with the platforms’ rules and algorithms, much like serfs under the rule of a singular lord. 3. Erosion of Democratic Values Centralization of Decision-Making Feudal systems were characterized by centralized power with little democratic oversight. AI companies wield substantial control over their platforms without accountability to the public. Decisions about AI usage, data privacy, and ethical considerations often lie outside democratic processes. Influence on Policy Major AI firms can exert influence over legislative agendas, creating an environment where corporate interests overshadow public welfare. This mirrors the historical power dynamics where lords influenced the governance of their fiefdoms. Conclusion The analogy of AI companies as modern-day feudal lords serves to highlight the profound implications of technological concentration and the erosion of labor rights. As we navigate this new socio-economic landscape, it becomes imperative to reconsider our frameworks for governance and equitable distribution of power, ensuring that culture, technology, and economy serve the broader public good rather than perpetuate a new form of serfdom. * Generated by #openAI #chatGPT