😱 Be not afraid of growing slowly, be afraid only of standing still…

“75% likelihood that #Bitcoin price will exceed US $4.81 million by April 2036” ACADEMIC RESEARCH:

Bitcoin supply, demand, and price dynamics by Murray A. Rudd, Dennis Porter :: SSRN

<p>In this research, we develop a bottom-up, quantity-clearing model of Bitcoin price formation that couples its fixed 21-million-coin cap with pla...

Sad but True

在边缘处思考

𝙲𝚑𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚎 𝙰𝚞𝚝𝚑𝚘𝚛𝚒𝚝𝚢: 𝙱𝚎 𝚄𝚗𝚐𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚗𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚎.

ꜱᴇɪᴢᴇ ᴛʜᴇ ɴᴏᴡstr ✨

* AI Companies as the New Feudal Lords Yanis Varoufakis's concept of #technofeudalism posits that contemporary economic structures resemble feudal systems, particularly with regard to power dynamics. In this framework, AI companies like OpenAI can be likened to feudal lords in several key ways: 1. Concentration of Power Economic Control Much like feudal lords controlled land and resources, AI companies wield significant influence over data, algorithms, and technological infrastructure. This concentration allows them to dictate the terms of engagement in various sectors. Access and Influence AI platforms have access to vast amounts of data, akin to land ownership in feudal times. This data grants them the ability to shape market trends, consumer behavior, and even public discourse, positioning them as gatekeepers of information. wealth disparities. 2. Dependency on Technology Serfdom of the Digital Age Just as peasants were dependent on feudal lords for their livelihoods, individuals and businesses increasingly rely on AI services for daily operations. This dependency can lead to diminished autonomy, as companies monopolize essential technological tools. Limited Choices The dominance of a few AI companies creates a monopoly-like environment where options become limited, forcing users into compliance with the platforms’ rules and algorithms, much like serfs under the rule of a singular lord. 3. Erosion of Democratic Values Centralization of Decision-Making Feudal systems were characterized by centralized power with little democratic oversight. AI companies wield substantial control over their platforms without accountability to the public. Decisions about AI usage, data privacy, and ethical considerations often lie outside democratic processes. Influence on Policy Major AI firms can exert influence over legislative agendas, creating an environment where corporate interests overshadow public welfare. This mirrors the historical power dynamics where lords influenced the governance of their fiefdoms. Conclusion The analogy of AI companies as modern-day feudal lords serves to highlight the profound implications of technological concentration and the erosion of labor rights. As we navigate this new socio-economic landscape, it becomes imperative to reconsider our frameworks for governance and equitable distribution of power, ensuring that culture, technology, and economy serve the broader public good rather than perpetuate a new form of serfdom. * Generated by #openAI #chatGPT

#OpenAI wants to make #ChatGPT into a universal app frontend.

Ars Technica

OpenAI wants to make ChatGPT into a universal app frontend

Spotify, Canva, Zillow among today&#039;s launch partners, more coming later this year.

MCP is the floodgate for leaking sensitive data. #randomthoughts #AI

𝚃𝙷𝙴 𝙵𝚁𝙴𝙴𝙳𝙾𝙼𝚂 𝚈𝙾𝚄 𝚂𝚄𝚁𝚁𝙴𝙽𝙳𝙴𝚁 𝚃𝙾𝙳𝙰𝚈 𝙰𝚁𝙴 𝚃𝙷𝙴 𝙵𝚁𝙴𝙴𝙳𝙾𝙼𝚂 𝚈𝙾𝚄𝚁 𝙶𝚁𝙰𝙽𝙳𝙲𝙷𝙸𝙻𝙳𝚁𝙴𝙽 𝚆𝙸𝙻𝙻 𝙽𝙴𝚅𝙴𝚁 𝙺𝙽𝙾𝚆 𝙴𝚇𝙸𝚂𝚃𝙴𝙳

• 𝙄𝙛 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙙𝙚𝙥𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙨𝙚𝙙, 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙡𝙞𝙫𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙞𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙥𝙖𝙨𝙩. • 𝙄𝙛 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙖𝙣𝙭𝙞𝙤𝙪𝙨, 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙡𝙞𝙫𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙞𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙛𝙪𝙩𝙪𝙧𝙚. • 𝙄𝙛 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙖𝙩 𝙥𝙚𝙖𝙘𝙚, 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙡𝙞𝙫𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙞𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙥𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙚𝙣𝙩.

🔵 🔴 #matrix

#Bitcoin at all time high #Gold at all time high Liberate yourself from the dollar and all its fiat currency derivatives Boycott the federal reserve with Bitcoin Boycott Blackrock by holding it in self-custody Boycott the banks by not borrowing against it Serve humanity Fight oppression Repost if you agree — via @Simon Dixon #quotestr on X https://nitter.net/SimonDixonTwitt/status/1975155537630069051

𝚠𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚎 𝚢𝚘𝚞’𝚛𝚎 𝚐𝚘𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚒𝚜 𝚏𝚊𝚛 𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚎 𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚗 𝚠𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚎 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚗𝚘𝚠 𝚘𝚛 𝚠𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚎 𝚢𝚘𝚞’𝚟𝚎 𝚋𝚎𝚎𝚗