Good devs do not support pointless event kinds that should just be kind 1 (e.g. 34236). Devs who try to break event-type standardization for bad reasons should simply be shunned. It is not good to encourage those devs trying to obfuscate functionality. It is not good to promote pointless complexity against new devs that want to develop nostr clients. It is not good to promote shit that pointlessly confuses users, and leads to unneeded instances of questions like "why can't I see this video in this client?"

The most-needed tags I know of off the top of my head, for a nostr tagging system. What others are needed? #asknostr Tags people would tag by hand: * Verified human For npubs you have met face to face. Timestamped at time of verification. Used as a whitelist to filter bots. * Trusted tagger For npubs you trust not to abuse the tagging system. Could implement as a 0-100 score, or a priority list, instead of binary (this would also work for some other tags). * Do not trust tagger For npubs you've seen egregiously abusing the tagging system. * Trusted truster For npubs you trust to select other good npubs to trust. * Promotes scam(s) For posts or npubs that promote scams. * Clear future prediction For a post like "1 Bitcoin will be x USD on y date." * Unclear/unresolvable/implied future prediction For a post like "I think Bitcoin is done going down, but it can always surprise me." * Correct prediction Self-explanatory. * Incorrect prediction Self-explanatory. * Unclear/unresolved past prediction The timeframe has passed, but the prediction or outcome was too unclear to make a verdict. * Humanoid spam For people injecting topics everywhere, but not literally botspamming. A perfect example is me constantly talking about the need for a tagging system on nostr. * Ad spam Self-explanatory. * Flood spam Posts where the goal is just to attack a space (like a hashtag or reply section) and "clog" it. * Gaslighting Posts where the author attempts gaslighting. * Discussion abandonment Posts with replies the author has ignored, without good reason. Automatic tags, clients would add systematically: * Npub has a lighting address * Npub's number of human verification tags from trusted taggers and their trusted taggers * Npub's number of scam promotions, according to trusted taggers and their trusted taggers * Npub's numbers of each type of prediction tag, according to trusted taggers and their trusted taggers * Npub is a humanoid spammer, according to [other npub, prioritizing closest in web of trust] * Npub is an ad spammer, according to [other npub, prioritizing closest in web of trust] * Npub is a flood spammer, according to [other npub, prioritizing closest in web of trust] * Npub was accused of gaslighting by [other npub, prioritizing closest in web of trust] * Npub's number of discussions abandoned, according to trusted taggers and their trusted taggers