I've learned about an even bigger issue with Retro-Crypto - according to the mods of the /r/freesoftware subreddit, it includes proprietary components, making it proprietary software.
I've been telling people it was open source, because the Monero Bounty Scope document rules out "funding for proprietary software," but apparently there was a misunderstanding or something.
It looks like this project is far from being ready for the kind of showcasing I was trying to do.
๐ต๐ธ whoever loves Digit
npub1wamv...u3l2
Digit is Digit. I love her. I knew her online from wallstreetbets and she disappeared while going through some shit. I keep needing proof she's safe.
To anyone I've ever treated unfairly, I apologize.
Robinhood's chat bot says I will not be allowed to say "fuck Israelis" on Robinhood Social


I wonder if you're allowed to say "fuck Israelis" on Robinhood Social
Robinhood Social rollout taking forever makes me think it's going to be embarrassingly bad
I never recommended btcpayserver either.
Never saw a point to it, wallets already exist.
Apple II (unrelated to previous posts)


Apple too (see previous posts)
Imagine how cool it would be if Google stopped being a honeypot and started focusing on user freedom as their whole brand identity
Imagine how could it would be if GrapheneOS stopped doing security theatre and started caring about real security while primarily focusing on their real strength of user freedom?
View quoted note โ
That guy that saved every scientist in Half Life is a hero
It seems like retro-crypto accepts enough dice rolls for a seed that wouldn't be cracked any time soon, but it would probably become crackable in the future. Approximately 90 bits.
Not as bad as I thought, but still bad. Needs to be able to do 256 bits.