Empire with a Humanitarian Face: Democrats Rebrand | The Libertarian Institute
Empire with a Humanitarian Face: Democrats Rebrand | The Libertarian Institute
By Matt Wolfson
> American political successions in recent years happen counterintuitively: implicit hand-offs between two nominally opposing sides. This strange reality is where we derive our notion of “the uniparty” and the media its notion of “partisanship.” Through the “partisan” lens favored by media, our politics appears divided between a party, the Republicans, in hock to Israel, the “big five” weapons contractors, real estate, Wall Street, and Silicon Valley; and a party, the Democrats, in hock to powerful “progressive” or “Left” nonprofits like ActBlue, the Southern Poverty Law Center, the Center for American Progress, and the Open Society Foundations.
> But the “uniparty” theory of the case shared by many politically disenfranchised Americans is a more accurate read of our political reality. Indeed, Democrats are as in hock to corporate and military interests as Republicans, and the newer “New Democratic” Party they are promising as a replacement to Donald Trump is his mirror image—there to serve the same interests under a different and deceptive cultural guise. Tracing the development of the modern Democrats from the late 1980s and early 1990s, and how that development shapes them today, shows that every sector of the party—from “neoliberals” to “progressives” to the Left—is de facto arbitered by military corporate interests which determine its policies and propaganda.
Stacker News
Empire with a Humanitarian Face: Democrats Rebrand | The Libertarian Institute \ stacker news
By Matt Wolfson American political successions in recent years happen counterintuitively: implicit hand-offs between two nominally opposing sides. ...
> Undisciplined and GrayRuby talk NBA playoffs, NHL playoffs, MLB salary cap discussions and more.
Increasingly, I'm suspecting that adding communism to stuff makes it worse. @grayruby disagrees.
