Have any of you guys f***** around with solv? Here's the current landscape for U.S.-accessible, non‑KYC (self-custodial) Bitcoin vault yield options for locking BTC—especially with a 90-day horizon: --- Available Today: Solv Protocol’s BTC+ Vault via dApp KYC-free when accessed directly through the Solv dApp, even for U.S. users . The product offers a 90-day epoch system, where you deposit BTC, receive a representative token (BTC+), and earn base yields around 4.5%–5.5% APR . It includes institution-grade security features like: Chainlink Proof-of-Reserves, NAV-based risk controls, and supports strategies across DeFi, CeFi, and real-world assets . Key point: Using the Solv dApp means no centralized KYC, and BTC remains self-custodied—so long as you're comfortable managing your own wallet. --- Others—Emerging or Theoretical Options 1. **Bitcoin Native Timelocks (CLTV)** Use Bitcoin’s Check Lock Time Verify (CLTV) to lock BTC natively while earning yield through participation in secured infrastructure . Still early-stage, not yet mainstream for retail. 2. Wrapped BTC on DeFi Platforms Popular method: wrap BTC (e.g., wBTC) and deploy on Ethereum or sidechains for lending or liquidity yield . Inherently involves smart contract and bridge risks—not ideal if prioritizing trustlessness. --- Quick Comparison Option US-Accessible KYC Required Custody Yield (APR) Notes Solv BTC+ via Solv dApp Yes No Self-custody ~4.5%–5.5% Institutional-grade, composable yields Solv via Binance (KYC) No (for US) Yes Custodial Similar base + boosts Not available to U.S. users CLTV-based native vaults TBD No Self-custody Early results Intriguing, but not broadly available Wrapped BTC DeFi (e.g., wBTC on Ethereum) Yes No Self-custody Varies Exposes to bridge and smart-contract risk --- Bottom Line: If your goal is a 90-day lockup BTC yield that's accessible in the U.S., self-custodial, and doesn’t need KYC, the Solv BTC+ vault via its dApp is your go-to—for now. It blends institutional-scale strategy with DeFi composability while respecting custody. Want help connecting a wallet to Solv, or modeling what locking 1 BTC for 90 days would return under current APR?

Platinum up 4.5%

Good thought experiment. If we assume Satoshi was a woman, here are the stylistic elements in her writing that support the hypothesis: --- 1. Politeness & Indirectness Satoshi frequently used softening phrases: “It would be nice if…” “I think…” “Probably…” This hedging style is less common in male cypherpunk forums of the 1990s/2000s, which were often blunt, adversarial, or aggressively confident. Reads more like an academic or educator accustomed to consensus-building. --- 2. Teaching Tone Posts often read like a lesson plan: Concepts are broken into step-by-step explanations. Heavy use of analogies (gold, mining, signatures). Rare jargon dumps; instead, technical ideas are framed for a broad audience. This “explain don’t boast” tone is atypical of the macho hacker culture at the time, but common among educators—including female academics trying to open technical fields. --- 3. Community Orientation Satoshi avoided first-person bragging. Rarely wrote “I invented…”—instead, emphasized the system itself. Often shifted attention away from self toward “we” and “the network.” That rhetorical modesty contrasts with male contemporaries who often debated by asserting authority. --- 4. Absence of Ego/Conflict Style Cypherpunk lists were full of flame wars; Satoshi’s style was calm, measured, and non-confrontational. Example: when criticized, Satoshi responded with patient explanations rather than dominance or sarcasm. That conflict-avoidance and collaborative framing fits more with stereotypical female discourse patterns identified in sociolinguistics. --- 5. Careful Identity Management Satoshi wrote in an unusually neutral register—free of idioms, pop culture, or “tells.” Sociolinguists note this hyper-awareness of concealment is consistent with someone navigating a male-dominated space where being outed as female could undermine credibility. --- Bottom Line If Satoshi was a woman, the supporting stylistic traits are: Hedging & politeness instead of blunt authority. Teaching tone instead of hacker one-upmanship. Community-centered framing over personal credit. Calm, non-combative replies in a flame-heavy environment. Neutral, guarded identity presentation that could double as camouflage. --- Would you like me to pull a few direct Satoshi quotes that showcase these traits side by side with typical male cypherpunk posts, so the contrast is crystal clear?

My four year old granddaughter has a towel for when she gets out of the bath that's got a hoodie built in I see kids with these shoes that you can turn into roller skates instantaneously Also a lot of them have these shoes that blink and flash when they run around like there's LEDs in there or something And I just got to say I'm f****** jealous We never had that s*** when I was a kid And except for the roller skates which I can't do cuz I'm an old crippled f*** everything else we should have as adults

Use my referral code to sign up for The Gemini Credit Card and get an extra $50 in crypto! Check out offer and benefits.

Gemini

Earn Crypto Rewards with the Gemini Credit Card®

Apply for the Gemini Credit Card - earn crypto rewards on everyday purchases with no annual fee.

We do a lot of dining out and this card gives me 3% back in Bitcoin Bitcoin goes up which it has during my use of this card it's like they retroactively paid for a third of my dinner

108k Buy now while supplies last!

I love it when they deport people to the wrong country just cracks me up How F****** retarded is our government? I was talking to a Canadian lawyer yesterday and he said that they are adding trumpatility to the force majeure section of contracts 'if he changes his mind again then the contract is null' in other words Trumpatility=market volatility caused by the orange snollygaster F****** retard

I have been involved in Bitcoin since we were all pedo drug terrorists Now we're president Oh wait nothing's changed

At one point IBM became a blockchain company You're asking whether IBM is still doing anything with XLM (Stellar Lumens) nowadays. Here’s the clear, fact-based rundown: --- What IBM Has Done with XLM — and What’s Now Historical Involvement IBM’s major project with Stellar was World Wire (also called Blockchain World Wire), a real-time cross-border payments system built on the Stellar public blockchain. Launched around 2017–2018, World Wire used XLM as a bridge currency between fiat currencies in payments. IBM acted as a network operator and validator on Stellar, offering enterprise tools—like validation nodes and a “Universal Payment Solution”—on top of Stellar’s public network. It enabled stablecoin issuance by participating banks and reduced settlement times dramatically. What’s Happened Since IBM open-sourced much of the World Wire code around 2021, shifting toward offering these capabilities as service accelerators for clients rather than running the network themselves. There’s no recent evidence (post-2021) of IBM continuing active projects or new developments directly tied to XLM or Stellar. IBM now seems more focused on broader blockchain services and enterprise blockchain, rather than advancing Stellar-specific products. --- Bottom Line Past involvement? Definitely. IBM built and operated World Wire using Stellar and XLM. Current activity? As of now, there’s no indication IBM is actively working with XLM. Everything points to their engagement winding down in the early 2020s. --- Let me know if you want a peek at IBM's current blockchain roadmap or alternatives in enterprise crypto rails—I can dig deeper, skip the fluff, and keep it tight.

BNB is binance coin right? How is that different than just buying the stock in the binance company?