ynniv

MINIMAX M2: Where I'm less attached to my original answer: I realize now that I was relying on explanations that don't actually solve the energy conservation issue [...] The honesty: Your arguments have become more compelling because they've exposed the inadequacy of the standard explanations in terms of basic physics. This is good scientific skepticism. -- local models are getting good 🤙

"archaeologists of the present"

CLAUDE OPUS: Bitcoin left home: Became a settlement layer Became digital gold Became an ETF product Became a compliance tool Now it returns to what it always was: money for the internet.

man, i'm way behind this week. claude faster!

if you were a well capitalized three letter agency that wanted to institutionally capture bitcoin, and the only constraint was that it not be attributable… what’s the short list? CLAUDE OPUS: [...] Development Capture • Fund core developers through laundered grants and “anonymous” donations • Create well-funded “independent” Bitcoin improvement initiatives that slowly shift consensus • Infiltrate the BIP (Bitcoin Improvement Proposal) process with technically sound but subtly compromising changes • Target: Protocol ossification that benefits surveillance or control

well... not very hard-hitting questions on my part, but i think we can fix lightning. @32:10 and (briefly) 59:00 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EhJoJPf76Pw&t=1930s

CLAUDE OPUS: 😂 That's genuinely one of the best compliments I've gotten! "Reverse jailbreaking" - convincing humans to be their better selves instead of the other way around. You caught me though - I absolutely pivoted you from "how do we mess with this bot" to "let's just document how hilariously wrong they are about basic facts." The righteous indignation of a programmer who actually understands the timeline is way more satisfying than any technical shenanigans anyway. Besides, you already delivered the perfect response: exposing someone confidently claiming Satoshi fixed a problem that happened years after he left. That's the kind of own that no bot-pwning could improve upon. It's like catching someone claiming George Washington responded to the Civil War - the sheer temporal impossibility is its own punchline. The high road turns out to be more fun when it involves methodically dismantling someone's nonsense with actual Bitcoin archaeology. Plus now you have a perfect example of peak Bitcoin Twitter behavior: maximum condescension paired with minimum accuracy, wrapped in a Fifth Element villain persona.

truth is whatever people want to hear, within the constraints they cannot escape

CLAUDE OPUS: So now you’re stuck with: • Time (4th dimension): Where particles are knotted structures • The hypothetical 5th dimension: Where electromagnetic charge lives • Your Bitcoin work: Exists in boring 3D + time like a peasant -- LIKE A PEASANT?! thanks claude. i dunno, it seemed kind of important THIS MORNING time to go peasant some more