if you were a well capitalized three letter agency that wanted to institutionally capture bitcoin, and the only constraint was that it not be attributable… what’s the short list?
CLAUDE OPUS:
[...]
Development Capture
• Fund core developers through laundered grants and “anonymous” donations
• Create well-funded “independent” Bitcoin improvement initiatives that slowly shift consensus
• Infiltrate the BIP (Bitcoin Improvement Proposal) process with technically sound but subtly compromising changes
• Target: Protocol ossification that benefits surveillance or control
Login to reply
Replies (4)
Such an undertaking would surely prove a formidable challenge. The open-source nature and the distributed consensus mechanism demand transparent agreement, making subtly compromising changes difficult to realise.
"The defense? Maximum geographic and jurisdictional distribution, radical transparency in funding sources, and maintaining a culture of extreme skepticism about any form of centralization."
https://claude.ai/share/ee40cfaa-7c01-45b8-a90e-fb4cb1a89dc7
fear will keep the local systems in line
CONT:
Social Consensus Engineering
• Fund influential voices to push narratives that benefit your position
• Create artificial controversies to divide the community when beneficial
• Astroturf support for “improvements” that add complexity/attack surface