The more I think about it, the more convinced I am that the age of aircraft carriers is at its end, because of drones/cheap missiles. These things are only going to get cheaper. A lot cheaper... radically cheaper, compared with their current cheapness already. When I watch an interception, I see two problems with defense.
First is the cost - I can see that the experience we're gaining here is telling us that expensive defense is a dumb against cheap offense. So, interception will be bullets or drones, and if you watched the defense of that embassy last night, maybe you'll agree - i think bullets are the way. There's also that company with the lasers, which seem very impressive, but that won't work in the near future, despite working quite well, because of the second problem...
All the interception video I've seen shows only one or two missiles at a time, and I've only seen one drone at a time. In the case of that embassy, the drones were coming in fairly quickly, but were still one at a time. That won't continue. If you can shoot down one, they'll send two. If you can shoot down two, they'll send three. Etc. As long as attack is cheap - not necessarily cheapER, just cheap - then the attacker always has the option to just send more simultaneously. This has been my main criticism of Iran's tactics so far - everything makes sense except this one thing : they could have saturated every target, but didn't. I'm not rooting for them, just to be clear. If an cutting edge system like lasers can defend an area effectively, then you just send a dozen of the flying lawnmowers at the same time at that one target, and then everything behind it is freebies. Or two dozen. Is that really how 'dozen' is spelled? Anyways. Or you send in a combo - that nifty Sejjil is surely the most advanced system in this fight, and all the moreso if it slams down immediately after defenses engage a bunch of the cheap drones.
And, as I said initially, these things are going to get even cheaper. And smaller, and faster, and more precise, all at once. Its hard for me to imagine us pouring billions into carriers in the age of drones. Similarly, **_any_** large and relatively immobile target - like bases - is too vulnerable. All force will have to be mobile or stealthy, and all will have to be hyper reactive to changing environments. Slow convoys from point A to point B are not going to work.
Well anyways. This is just my current favorite thing. I'm no expert.
Comte de Sats Germain
resonance@zaps.lol
npub12h6h...qpsf
A concrescence of Mind fumbling with the controls of this meat chariot.
Nostr only !
This Indian general is at least 37x more intelligent than anyone in America who has said anything about Iran, ever.
Zionism is a threat to national security. I'm not saying any religion is - only that particular belief, which is the cause for this ill considered war.
๐ค by the standards of the ancient Greeks and Romans, nearly everyone in modern times is a slave. Free men do not work for other people - free men own and work for themselves.
First Hubris.
Now Nemesis.
China will attack.
In the hilariously tiny chance that someone who is able to influence a foreign nation's policy reads this... please don't join Trump's war. Don't help. Make Trump eat some humble pie. Any help you give, of any sort, will only result in more lives lost.
The psychopathic media keeps framing the murder of the previous Iranian leader as a "decapitation strike," and talking about the leaders they killed. But what really matters is that they killed the family if their current leader. His father, sister, nephew, and brother-in-law... All murdered. So... What would you do, in his shoes? When would you call it off and stop seeking revenge?
Christian Zionism did this. They're still cheering on the war, still calling for blood in their satanic churches. They are satanic. They think they're not, but they are. Christians don't murder, and they certainty don't do this. But Trump was empowered to do this by the evangelicals. You will know them by their fruits, right? Face reality. And think... What would you do?
๐ค a simple framework to understand why the US is lying about its goals in Iran. Very simple.
Iran is/was opposed to ISIS. Their proxies, the mostly Shua militias are opposed to ISIS. In fact, most such militias that currently exist were formed by Iran expressly to oppose ISIS. Stability in Iraq was purchased by cooperating with Iran specifically to fight ISIS. If that hadn't occurred, Iraq would have completely fell apart.
So now the American goal in Iran is regime change, and Israel's goal is balkanization. That's not conjecture - its just taking them at their word, Trump and Netanyahu have publicly stated their goals. Supposing either goal is achieved, what will that do to the stability of tgw region? ISIS returns with a vengeance, Iraq falls apart and in probably the best case scenario becomes three new states. One of those states will be Kurdish, and that dramatically weakens Turkey, a NATO ally. But they won't stay a NATO ally. They'll be forced into Russia's arms to secure their east.
If you were paying attention back when ISIS was terrorizing... everybody... then you'll remember that we eventually found out that Israel funded ISIS at a minimum, and very probably was controlling it from the beginning.
Conclusion : Trump, just like his buddy Epstein, is an agent of the Rothschilds, who are the architects of Zionism. Call it a conspiracy theory if you want, but all of this can be verified, and has been verified over and over. Bam, easy. If you're not connecting these dots, I'm sorry, you're just left curve.
Lol wut... Day before yesterday, Trump tells the UK he doesn't need their help. Today he begs them to send warships. Its worse than I thought.
โ woke up early. Woke up kinda mad at boomers and Zionism. Much can be said on this, but.... its a trap.
Here's how to avoid the trap. Before allowing yourself to make a statement, make yourself ask a question. Boomers never ask questions. Neither do idolaters. Ask the questions, give people an opportunity to use their heads - then, maybe you can say a thing, or maybe another question would be better, but just never start with a statement.
โ
Remember that weird video of Biden talking about corn puff and leg hair at a swimming pool?
Wasn't that right before we got AI videos? I bet that was AI...