أنس القطونجي

اوك يمديني احذف النوتات على jumple

بسم الله مدري كيف نسيت انشر الارشيف الدال على كفر العمدة زهران لكن ان تصل متأخرا خير من ان لا تصل المختصر انه شيعي اثناعشري داعم للشذوذ والنسوية والاجهاض، ولا تنس ان امريكا لو رات ان شخص يوشك على ان يدخل ولو القليل من الحكم الاسلامي في بلده لطردوه، فلم لم يطردوا زهران برأيك والطرد عندهم اسهل من شرب الماء؟ https://archive.is/TLlx3 https://archive.is/erS3T https://archive.is/qkBAp https://archive.is/P2SRc https://archive.is/JubIG https://archive.is/mnocH https://archive.is/Ul0HB

رسالة حلّ الإشكال في إجبار اليهود على التقاط الأزبال | مُستلّ من فتاوى العلّامة الشوكاني رسالة بديعة فيها فوايد عديدة، ونكت أصولية لطيفة، وقعت في ١٦ صفحة. أبان فيها الشوكانيّ -رحمه الله- عن وجوب تكليف اليهود بالتقاط أزبال المسلمين، وإعفاء المسلمين من هذه المهنة، مستنبطا ذلك من خمسة عشر دليلا من الكتاب والسنة. رابط الرسالة في ملف pdf: https://t.me/mustakeen/4260 منقول من "مستكين عزيز" على تويتر

ايه اذكره كان كافر ولن يقبل منه ما فعله كما قال الله في القرآن { إن الذين كفروا وماتوا وهم كفار فلن يقبل من أحدهم ملء الأرض ذهبا ولو افتدى به أولئك لهم عذاب أليم وما لهم من ناصرين } [سُورَةُ آلِ عِمْرَانَ: ٩١] هذا لو فرضنا ان انتحاره كان حلالا ومن يقول بأنه من أهل الفترة فهو موهوم لان مجرد السماع بأن هناك دين يدعى الاسلام يعتبر حجة كما قال الرسول صلى الله عليه وسلم 1- والذي نَفْسُ مُحَمَّدٍ بيَدِهِ، لا **يَسْمَع**ُ بي أحَدٌ مِن هذِه الأُمَّةِ يَهُودِيٌّ، ولا نَصْرانِيٌّ، ثُمَّ يَمُوتُ ولَمْ يُؤْمِنْ بالَّذِي أُرْسِلْتُ به، إلَّا كانَ مِن أصْحابِ النَّارِ. الراوي: أبو هريرة المحدث: مسلم المصدر: صحيح مسلم الصفحة أو الرقم: 153 خلاصة حكم المحدث: [صحيح] https://dorar.net/h/NXSn6JA2 واليوم سهل جدا انك تتحقق من اي معلومة اسلامية ذا غير جهود الشيخ عثمان فاروق في الدعوة والذي اسلم على يده كثيرون، فلا ادري ماذا يمنعه من الايمان بالحق؟ nostr:note1ppz3rw7x4l4erehzhq5dagm96meh939v2ts8cw8qx0ueysrla89serggqn

مجرد تنبيه بسيط جدا جدا جدا اتركوا الذنوب الجارية كل اقتباس لمنشور فيه متبرجة هي ذنوب جارية كل نشر لمقطع في موسيقى هي ذنوب جارية كل اعادة نشر لفيديو فيه عورة هي ذنوب جارية كل كلام ايجابي عن اي حرام هي ذنوب جارية كل من رآها او سمعها ذنبهم في رقبتك والاغلب يقومون بكل هذا ظنا منهم انهم يدافعون عن الدين او يردون على الباطل ويظنون بأنهم أحسنوا صنعا، وفي النهاية تجد جبال ذنوب لا تدري من اين اتى، وقد تراكمت حتى بعد موتك كل من ساهم بنشر الباطل سألغي متابعته، فلا أريد أن أساهم أنا أيضا

From u/onechroma on r/linux subreddit: Linux desktop is attracting new users, and that's good, but we must be critical of everything that needs improvement I recently returned to Linux after a 2-3 year absence, and I was surprised by how well it has evolved on the desktop. More stability, compatibility with more software, mature DEs... it's a real pleasure. However, I also notice that the Linux community has some areas for improvement from different points of view (its organization, how it welcomes newbies, software, etc.). I'm writing this post just to see if others see the same things I do. If not, that's fine, you can give your opposing opinion and debate it, no need to lynch me. Here we go: 1. Dependence on large companies. Yes, I know, they are precisely the ones that finance and support Linux the most, but at the same time, they do nothing but twist the community to their liking, sometimes damaging it. We have Canonical imposing its Snaps on Ubuntu, even hijacking you when you try to install using "sudo apt install", probably the most well-known distro among the general public. In addition, more recently, there has been some debate about replacing GNU tools with a rewrite in RUST that will be licensed under MIT (more permissive, allowing those who benefit from the code and modify it to not have to share the result, privatizing it). We also have Red Hat, which two years ago decided to restrict access to the RHEL source code to the community, citing that others were benefiting “unfairly” from that access, as other companies (ie, CIQ) were creating clones of RHEL and then offering support and charging for it. All these developments don't seem positive for the Linux community and are reminiscent of how Microsoft treats Windows, which is manipulated like their toy. Of course, there are still other “community” distributions, such as Debian or Arch, although they are not as easy for beginners to get started with. 2) Division of efforts. It is in the nature of Linux that everyone can create their own “home,” and therefore, it is inevitable that there will be hundreds of distributions, but when there is none that is capable of being “perfect” for the general public (there is always some drawback, however small, in Gnome, KDE, Cinnamon...), it seems incredible that efforts continue to be divided even further. We have the PopOS! team as example, although they started well and gained some popularity in their day, now they seem to think it is worthy their time and effort to create another new DE (COSMIC), just... because? Until in the end, we have almost as many DEs as distributions, and some with very little usage (how many people use Budgie? What future will MATE have?). I understand that customization is the soul of Linux, but sometimes it feels like it weighs it down a lot. “Divide and conquer,” they said about the vanquished. 3) Lack of consistency. Similar to the above, in Linux you can do anything, that's clear, but it won't help its “mass” adoption if the instructions for doing basic things change so much depending on the distribution or DE. Sometimes, even what is compatible can be affected by things that the casual user doesn't understand (X11 vs Wayland, for example). 4) Comfort with using “advanced” applications or settings. For example, no one is incentivized to build open-source software that synchronizes clouds (Google Drive, OneDrive, and others, similar to InsyncHQ, with active real-time synchronization), because advanced users have more than enough with RClone and the terminal. Or in specific configurations, the terminal is still unavoidable. If you want to install drivers for an HP Laserjet printer, you'll have to go through the terminal. Want to install Warp VPN? Terminal! It's not bad at all, don't get me wrong, but it makes me angry that there is still a certain complacency that prevents Linux from being “chewed up” a little more to attract the general public, which would help popularize Linux and make more native software compatible. 5) Lack of attention to cybersecurity. Beginners are often told not to worry, that “there is no malware” on Linux desktops. At the same time, we have seen how Arch's AUR repository has been detected with malware, or how certain vulnerabilities have affected Linux this year (Sudo having a PAM vulnerability allowing full root access, two CUPS bugs that let attackers remote DoS and bypass auth, DoS flaw in the kernel's KSMBD subsystem, Linux kernel vulnerability exploited from Chrome renderer sandbox... And all of that, only in the last 2 months). Related to this are questionable configurations, such as trusting Flatpak 100%, even though the software available there can often be packages created by anonymous third parties and not the original developer, or the use of browsers installed in this way, even though this means that the browser's own sandbox is replaced by Flatpak's sandboxing. 6) Updates that have the capacity to break entire systems, to the point of recommending reinstalling the system from scratch in some cases. This is almost on par with Windows or worse, depending on the distribution and changes that have taken place. It is well known that in Linux, depending on the distro, updating is a lottery and can leave you without a system. This should be unacceptable, although understandable, given that Linux is still a base (monolithic kernel with +30M lines) with a bunch of modules linked together on top, each one different from the other. In the end, it is very easy for things to break when updating. In part, immutable distributions help with this, allowing you to revert to a previous state when, inevitably, the day comes when the system breaks, unless you can afford to have a system with hardly any modifications, with software as close to a “clean” state as possible. If the system breaks and you are not on an immutable distribution, you have already lost the casual user. At the end, I want to love Linux, but I see that many of the root causes preventing its popularity from growing (on the desktop, I'm not counting its use as a kernel for heavily modified things like Android, or its use by professional people in servers) haven't consideribly improved. The community remains deeply divided, fighting amongst itself even on some issues, and continues to scare away the general public who come with the idea of “just having work done”. Because of all this, a few days ago, I was surprised to see that Linux in the Steam survey remains at 2.64%. It's better than the 1.87% from just a year ago (Sept. 24), of course, and I suppose SteamDecks have helped a lot too, but it's a shame that it's not able to attract the audience that is migrating elsewhere on Windows (Windows 11 went from 47.69% to 60.39% in the same period, even with all the TPM thing that will make millions of PCs "incompatible" with Win11). In other words, for every person who switched to Linux in the survey, more than 16 people switched to Windows 11. **What are your thoughts on improving Linux (if it were up to you)? Do you think there will come a time when Linux will have a significant share of the desktop market, so that it will at least be taken into account in software development?** (And please, I would ask that haters refrain from contributing nothing, simply accusing me of something or telling me to “go to Windows.” I hate gatekeeping and not being able to have real discussions sometimes in this community. Thank you).

مجرد تذكير نشر الموسيقى والمتبرجات على النت حرام ايا كان داعي نشره، وعليك اثم كل من رآه رأيت اخوة ينشرون تبرج وموسيقى هنا ويفترض انهم يعرفون الحكم الشرعي لها فهي من ابسط الامور

السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته لعبة هولونايت صارت ترند فقلت اقوم انشر تحذير منها لأن فيها شرك في اصل القصة هنا سلسلة من اخ جزاه الله خيرا (خاصة باللعبة الاصلية وليست بجزء silksong) https://xcancel.com/Mohammedjk907/status/1736095080664985953 هي بالأساس منشورة على تويتر وبما ان تويتر يطلب منك تسجيل الدخول لمشاهدة التغريدة فقررت وضع رابط nitter الخاص بها واذكركم ونفسي بقول الله تعالى:

Posted as a regular note instead of an article since ditto doesn't support them yet Thanks to brother Shvan from taif discord server https://discord.gg/taif # Will we enter Hell because we celebrated the Prophet’s birthday? honestly, today I will not repeat what we hear every year about the proofs that the Mawlid celebration is innovation [bid'aah] like that none of the righteous predecessors [Al-salaf] ever practiced it, and that the scholars themselves did not even know the exact date of the Prophet’s ﷺ birth and there are multiple conflicting opinions in his birthdate, and that we have no single authentic proof for the precise day in Rabiʿ al-Awwal month when he was born, and all other well-known evidences. But today I want to respond to two emotional arguments that the innovators use regarding the Mawlid: # First Argument: How can our love for the Prophet ﷺ and celebrating him be a cause for entering Hell? The answer is that love for the Prophet ﷺ is indeed a righteous deed, and no Muslim doubts that. However, this is an emotional and deceptive question meant to mislead Muslims. The sin is not because you love the Messenger, but because you introduce a religious innovation that Allah and His Messenger did not legislate. That, in itself, is disobedience to the Prophet. True love is shown through following, not through innovating. Even al-Sakhawi, an Ashʿari scholar who considered the Mawlid celebration permissible, admitted that no one from the early generations of Muslims ever practiced it, saying: “None of the Salaf in the first three centuries ever did it. It was introduced afterwards.” [al-Sira al-Halabiyya] This is similar to what Saʿid ibn al-Musayyib رحمه الله—one of the great Salaf—did when he saw a man repeating extra bowings after Fajr. He forbade him. The man said: “O Abu Muhammad, will Allah punish me for praying?” Ibn al-Musayyib replied: “No, but He will punish you for going against the Sunnah.” [Musannaf ʿAbd al-Razzaq]

تم النشر كملاحظة عادية لان ditto لا تدعم المقالات منقول من الاخ shvan من سيرفر طيف على ديسكورد https://discord.gg/taif # أندخل النار لأننا احتفلنا بالمولد النبوي؟ بصراحة لا أود أن أعيد ما نسمعه كل عام من الأدلة على بدعيّة الاحتفال بالمولد وأنه لم يحتفل به أحد من السلف الصالح بتاتًا، ولا أن العلماء لا يعرفون أصلًا الموعد الدقيق لولادة النبيﷺ وقد اختلفوا على عدة أقوال وليس لدينا دليل واحد صحيح على اليوم الذي وُلد فيه النبي بالتحديد في شهر ربيع الأول وغيرها من الأدلة التي صار يعرفها الكل. لكن أود اليوم أن أُجيب على شبهتين عاطفتين يطرحها المبتدعة فيما يخص الاحتفال بالمولد النبوي: # أ- الشبهة الأولى: كيف تكون محبتنا للنبيﷺ واحتفالنا به سببًا لدخول النار؟ والإجابة: أن محبة النبيﷺ عمل صالح ولا يشك في هذا مسلم، لكن هذا سؤال عاطفي خبيث للتلبيس على المسلمين وخداعهم، فالإثم هنا ليس بسبب محبتك للرسول وإنما بسبب إحداث بدعة في الدين لم يشرعها الله ورسوله، وهذا في حد ذاته مخالفة لأوامر النبي، **فالمحبة تكون بالاتباع لا بالابتداع**. وهذا السخاوي وهو عالم أشعري يرى إباحة الاحتفال بالمولد ورغم ذلك يعترف بأن الاحتفال بالمولد لم يفعله أحد من المسلمين إطلاقًا في القرون الأولى، قال:(لم يفعله أحد من السّلف في القرون الثلاثة، وإنّما حدث بعد) [السيرة الحلبية] وهذا مثل ما فعله سعيد بن المسيب رحمه الله - وهو من أئمة السلف - عندما رأى رجلا يكرر الركوع بعد طلوع الفجر فنهاه، فقال: «يا أبا محمد أيعذبني الله على الصلاة؟» فقال: «لا، ولكن يعذبك على خلاف السنة» [مصنف عبدالرزاق] # ب- الشبهة الثانية: المسلمون يموتون في غزة وأنتم لا زلتم تتقاتلون بينكم على هذه الأمور واعلم رحمك الله أن قائل هذا الكلام خبيث ضال؛ فبدلا من أن يدعو الناس إلى التمسك بالدين والعمل الصالح الذي وعد الله فاعليه بالاستخلاف في الأرض وأن يبدلهم من بعد خوفهم أمنا، تجده يعين أهل الضلال ويحارب من يأمر بالمعروف وينهى عن المنكر ويتسبب في تأخير نهضة الأمة والله المستعان. **فنهضة الأمة وانتصارها والله لن يكون إلا بالتمسك بالدين وترك البدع والمعاصي، وهذا ما قاله الله تعالى: (وعد الله الذين امنوا منكم وعملوا الصالحات ليستخلفنهم في الارض كما استخلف الذين من قبلهم وليمكنن لهم دينهم الذي ارتضى لهم وليبدلنهم من بعد خوفهم امنا)** ||@everyone ||

nostr:npub1qfesn5yjtyts6fk38kufjgjurqnmg8ngct04djyfjvcr8tuagg6q226ee3 هل المقال اللي انا كاتبه دقيق كفاية ولا لا؟ انا كاتبه على yakihonne