𝔣𝔲𝔫 𝔣𝔞𝔠𝔱, 𝔦𝔫 𝔱𝔥𝔢 𝔡𝔢𝔲𝔰 𝔢𝔵 𝔤𝔞𝔪𝔢𝔰, 451 𝔞𝔭𝔭𝔢𝔞𝔯𝔰 𝔞 𝔩𝔬𝔱 𝔦𝔫 𝔯𝔢𝔣𝔢𝔯𝔢𝔫𝔠𝔢 𝔱𝔬 𝔉𝔞𝔯𝔢𝔦𝔫𝔥𝔢𝔦𝔱 451, 𝔱𝔥𝔢 𝔟𝔬𝔬𝔨 𝔟𝔶 ℜ𝔞𝔶 𝔅𝔯𝔞𝔡𝔟𝔲𝔯𝔶 𝔞𝔟𝔬𝔲𝔱 𝔟𝔬𝔬𝔨 𝔟𝔲𝔯𝔫𝔦𝔫𝔤. 𝔱𝔥𝔦𝔰 𝔦𝔰 𝔱𝔥𝔢 𝔱𝔢𝔪𝔭𝔢𝔯𝔞𝔱𝔲𝔯𝔢 𝔞𝔱 𝔴𝔥𝔦𝔠𝔥 ʙᴏᴏᴋꜱ ʙurn. View quoted note →

epic a sʟɪnɢsʜoᴛ ᴛʜaᴛ can ᴘroᴅuce as mucʜ ᴛermɪnaʟ ʙaʟʟɪsᴛɪc ꜰorce as a ʜanᴅɢun

ᴛʜe mʟeᴋu eaᴛs ʜɪs own ᴅoɢꜰooᴅ ᴘʟeʙeɪan-sɪɢner ɪs now mʏ maɪn nosᴛr sɪɢner, anᴅ as sucʜ, ɪ wɪʟʟ ʙe aʙʟe ᴛo ꜰuʟʟʏ ᴛesᴛ ɪᴛ ꜰor mʏ own use ꜰuʟʟ ᴛɪme. ᴛʜe exᴛensɪon ɪs ᴘreᴛᴛʏ mucʜ cʟose ᴛo reaᴅʏ, aʟʟ nosᴛr ꜰuncᴛɪons worᴋ, anᴅ ᴛʜe casʜu mɪnᴛ sᴛuꜰꜰ ᴊusᴛ neeᴅs a ʙɪᴛ more ᴛesᴛɪnɢ. so, anʏone wʜo wanᴛs ᴛo ᴛesᴛ ᴛʜɪs, aᴅvɪse me oꜰ ᴛʜe ʙesᴛ nosᴛr cʟɪenᴛ ꜰor receɪvɪnɢ ᴘeanuᴛs vɪa casʜu ᴘroᴛocoʟ, anᴅ ɪ wɪʟʟ ᴘaʏ ʏou 2x wʜaᴛ ʏou senᴅ me, assumɪnɢ ɪᴛ's noᴛ more ᴛʜan a ꜰew ꜰɪaᴛ ᴛrumᴘ-ʙux worᴛʜ. i am using minibits for testing, btw, so that's the type of cashu token you want to test me with.

ꜰʏɪ ɪn case ʏou are ꜰooʟeᴅ anᴅ ᴛʜɪnᴋ asɪᴅe ꜰrom mʏ weɪrᴅ aesᴛʜeᴛɪc ᴘroᴘensɪᴛɪes, ᴛʜaᴛ ᴛʜɪs weɪrᴅ unɪcoᴅe ᴛʏᴘɪnɢ ɪs some ᴋɪᴅ oꜰ sɪɢn oꜰ a cʜaracᴛer ꜰʟaw, ɪᴛ ɪs noᴛ (onʟʏ) ᴛʜaᴛ. anʏone wʜo uses ameᴛʜʏsᴛ or oᴛʜer nosᴛr cʟɪenᴛs ᴛʜaᴛ ʜave ᴛransʟaᴛɪon ꜰeaᴛures, are caʟʟɪnɢ ʟʟms ᴛo "ᴛransʟaᴛe" ᴛʜe ᴛexᴛ. ᴛʜɪs cosᴛs aʟmosᴛ eǫuaʟ ᴛo as ɪꜰ ɪ was ᴛʏᴘɪnɢ ɪn a ꜰoreɪɢn ʟanɢuaɢe ʟɪᴋe cʜɪnese or ɢeorɢɪan or someᴛʜɪnɢ. ɪᴛ's ʟɪmɪᴛɪnɢ ʜow mucʜ auᴛomaᴛeᴅ surveɪʟʟance sʏsᴛems can caᴘᴛure. ɪꜰ ɪ couʟᴅ maᴋe an arranɢemenᴛ wɪᴛʜ someone ᴛo ᴘromoᴛe ᴘroɢrammaʙʟe, ǫmᴋ ꜰɪrmware usɪnɢ mecʜanɪcaʟ ᴋeʏʙoarᴅs, anʏone can ʜave ᴛʜɪs, anᴅ ɪꜰ anʏone wanᴛs ᴛo ᴅo ᴛʜe ʟeɢworᴋ, ɪ'm ʜaᴘᴘʏ ᴛo ᴘrovɪᴅe a more munᴅane, non-ᴅvoraᴋ ʙaseᴅ ʟaʏouᴛ ᴛʜaᴛ ʟeᴛs ʏou ʜave aᴛ ʟeasᴛ ᴛʜe ᴛʜree ɪ ʜave unɪcɪaʟ ꜱᴍᴀʟʟ ᴄᴀᴘꜱ (ᴛᴇʀʀʏ ᴘʀᴀᴛᴄʜᴇᴛᴛ ᴅᴇᴀᴛʜ ᴛᴇxᴛ) 𝔣𝔯𝔞𝔨𝔱𝔲𝔯 (a mathematical unicode script that looks like black-letter, like 𝔜𝔢 𝔬𝔩𝔡𝔢 𝔈𝔫𝔤𝔩𝔦𝔰𝔥/𝔊𝔢𝔯𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔦𝔠) there could be further options for the more patient, to find ways to make layouts that print all kinds of nasty symbols from many different language scripts to fuck with the spooks.

ᴊusᴛ ʙeen consɪᴅerɪnɢ mʏ oᴘᴛɪons ꜰor ʜeaᴛɪnɢ ꜰueʟs ꜰor ᴛʜe ʜeaᴛer ɪn mʏ ᴘʟace ᴊusᴛ now, anᴅ ᴛʜɪs convɪnces me ᴛʜaᴛ ɪ'm ɢonna ʙuʏ a ꜰew sacᴋs oꜰ coaʟ ꜰor ʜeaᴛɪnɢ ꜰor mʏ excursɪon ᴛo ᴛʜe ʙɪɢ ᴛown ᴛomorrow mornɪnɢ: > how does coal (probably compressed, small chunk style) compare to wood for weight to thermal units for heating? ● Coal vs Wood - Heat Output by Weight | Fuel Type | BTU per pound | |----------------------------------|---------------| | Anthracite coal | 12,500–15,000 | | Bituminous coal | 10,500–14,000 | | Seasoned hardwood (oak, hickory) | 6,000–8,600 | | Softwood (pine, fir) | 4,000–6,000 | Bottom line: Coal delivers roughly 1.5–2x more heat per pound than seasoned hardwood. Practical considerations: - Moisture matters: Wood BTU ratings assume ~20% moisture content. Wet wood can drop to half its potential output. Coal is essentially dry. - Burn time: Coal burns much longer and more steadily than wood—less tending overnight. - Ash: Anthracite produces less ash than bituminous; both produce far less ash than wood. - Startup: Coal is harder to ignite—typically needs a wood kindling fire first. - Storage: Coal is denser, so it takes less space per BTU (roughly 2–3x less volume than equivalent wood). For small compressed chunks (like stoker coal or nut coal), you're likely looking at bituminous or anthracite in the 11,000–14,000 BTU/lb range—still significantly more energy-dense than wood by weight. sounᴅs ʟɪᴋe ɪꜰ ɪ ʙuʏ a sᴛacᴋ oꜰ aʙouᴛ 100ᴋɢ, ᴛrɪvɪaʟ ꜰor mʏ ᴛaxɪ ᴅrɪver's ɢɪanᴛ ʙooᴛ, ɪ'ʟʟ ʙe covereᴅ ꜰor now unᴛɪʟ cʟose ᴛo ᴛʜe enᴅ oꜰ ᴊanuarʏ.

https://www.youtube.com/@Nighthawkinlight ɪn case ʏou ᴅɪᴅn'ᴛ see ʜɪs vɪᴅeo on aerocreᴛe, nɪɢʜᴛʜawᴋɪnʟɪɢʜᴛ mɪɢʜᴛ ʙe one oꜰ ᴛʜe mosᴛ awesome, ᴅown ᴛo earᴛʜ, anᴅ creaᴛɪve ɪnvenᴛors ʏou can ꜰɪnᴅ on ʏouᴛuʙe, ʜanᴅs ᴅown, aʙsoʟuᴛeʟʏ no ǫuesᴛɪon. ɪ maʏ ʜave ᴛo maᴋe mʏseʟꜰ sɪᴛ ᴅown ꜰor a sessɪon anᴅ waᴛcʜ as manʏ oꜰ ʜɪs eʏe-caᴛcʜɪnɢ ɪnᴛeresᴛɪnɢ ᴘresenᴛaᴛɪons anᴅ ᴅerɪve/ᴅocumenᴛ wʜaᴛ ʜe ɪs ᴅoɪnɢ. anᴅ ɪ ꜰeeʟ ʟɪᴋe, ɪ wɪʟʟ wanᴛ ᴛo senᴅ ʜɪm some moneʏ ꜰor ʜɪs ɪncreᴅɪʙʟe worᴋ as an ɪnvenᴛor.