misty breez isn't a bitcoin wallet. it isn't non-custodial. it isn't permissionless or censorship resistant because boltz has censored payments before and it goes down for maintenance. misty breez inherits exactly zero security from the bitcoin network. you'd know this if you spent more than 10 seconds trying to understand how these tools actually work underneath. View quoted note →

absolutely shocking that every single response to this post is just clueless maxi incredulity. they can't accept that proof of work has any flaws, because it contradicts their firmly held religious beliefs View quoted note →

who is ark for? it's for people who already decided that the UX of self-custody lightning is in an unacceptable state. the bar is higher. if ark is just as shitty as lightning then nothing is gained. clArk is too interactive. the user has to do something to the money that they have in the ASP all the time so that it can't get stolen. this will cause problems especially for people who want to use it infrequently or on their phone. a person who won't manage their own lighting channels is not gonna still look after an always on computer just so they can use ark instead. I don't think ark will appeal to the exact kind of people who would use it unless it has CTV and maybe CSFS. clArk is just a proof of concept. you need the full thing or it will not catch on.