If you thought Bitcoin was fringe wait until you hear about the psychedelic Bitcoin gathering we just wrapped up. The fiat gang has no idea what’s coming. On to the next ☀️🙏

Does Bitcoin need guardians of purity? Or guardians of neutrality?

Money determines how much complexity civilization can sustain. Fiat money is slowly breaking that coordination system. Bitcoin introduces a new operating system for the individual and, potentially, final money for civilization.

LIVE: BFM269 w/ @Peruvian Bull ⚡️ "Japan is the failing monetary experiment lab of global central banks” We discuss: 🔸 BOJ interventions losing power 🔸 Unlimited QE 🔸 Zombie companies & stagnation 🔸 How Japan’s crisis hits US Treasuries 🔸 Bitcoin as 24/7 liquidity sponge

Money is the PRIMARY USE CASE of Bitcoin’s technology and monetary network. This is what ALL education must focus on. 🔸What is money? 🔸Why is fiat money stealing your time & energy? 🔸Why does hard money give you hope for the future? 🔸How can you opt out? 🔸What is the power of self custody? 🔸Why is Bitcoin superior money? 🔸What makes it antifragile? 🔸What makes it more “real” than fiat money? And so on. Inscribing data (spam) on the blockchain is a certain, retarded, USAGE (not Use Case) of Bitcoin’s underlying technology. Some people see it as a showcase for permissionless technology like Bitcoin (which is correct), others think it is stupid, lame, and unproductive (like me). BUT: Bitcoin’s USAGE as money is not yet global, and this will take a LONG time (that is why education is needed), WAY longer than most can handle. NOBODY CARES ABOUT BITCOIN LIKE YOU DO ANON. (That is the asymmetric opportunity btw) Fees are low and thus people can and will spam. I personally think this will die out over time as blockspace becomes more scarce and expensive. That is my personal take. If you CANNOT STOP SPAM, blockspace is cheap, and retard spammers exist (although a minority), I personally think it is not smart to propose a change at the Bitcoin consensus level because that would, imo, hurt the possible monetary use case of Bitcoin because that use case is established by fundamental consensus and protocol rules that are hard to change (impossible I hope). Bitcoin “Core” is a misleading name because many people think they maintain Bitcoin’s rules. They maintain the main reference client and although you might not agree with what they do or did for whatever reason you think is valid, they can do whatever they want. If you think their stewardship is turning malicious, make a better node implementation (could be Knots) and tell more people about it. If BIP110 does not stop spam, is temporary AND touches consensus, it is not a good idea. I see this as a classic case of early adopters who want to change USAGE of a technology they don’t approve, by wanting to change a very important part of said technology (consensus). They fail to understand that although a technology can be built with a certain primary use case in mind, it will never be used by everyone in that way. ESPECIALLY not a permissionless protocol like Bitcoin. That is the entire point of Bitcoin’s tech. We are still extremely early in the monetary WAR against fiat money and I think all energy that is now focused on being angry, should be focused on education. TL;DR: zoom out. Love ya’ll🧡

LIVE: BFM268 📺 A solo episode where I share how the fiat money system is kept alive by keeping everyone trapped in it⚡️ I discuss: 🔸The global monetary war and its two fronts 🔸The one pointed at you 🔸CBDCs & cash limits 🔸How exits are closing 🔸Bitcoin as the only opt-out

Fiat money needs you to stay a perpetually anxious consumer. Bitcoin makes you a hopeful builder.

What does the act of changing rules this with 55% consensus do to the credibility of rule-stability itself? Nobody holds Bitcoin because of the opcode set. They hold it because they believe the ruleset of 2126 will resemble the ruleset of 2026. The store-of-value foundation.

Consensus = Consensus. You need to F around to find out, but that is fine. Because it is proof of work. That is the law of the land. Consensus is either there or not. Virtue signaling is worth 0. You are ALL-IN.

If you think Bitcoin is the most neutral, hardest money, most pristine collateral to ever exist --> it will be financialized. It's a bridge for Bitcoin's properties and values to shine. Our utopian bitcoinized world is FAR FAR AWAY, FOR NOW. More people need to zoom out more.

The ONLY bullish thing for Bitcoin is mathematically assured fiat debasement, infinite gold supply, the fact you never truly own stocks, real estate is a liability and can't be teleported, art is not saleable while Bitcoin is global, neutral, decentralized, math, physics & OPEN.

Bitcoin is so elegantly simple in its core that it is extremely hard to understand in a world of fiat money noise. It sounds too good to be true - that something as profound as Bitcoin could free us from central overlords stealing our time and energy - that most fade it.

All wisdom traditions converged on this: High entropy = fear & chaos Low entropy = love, order & trust Fiat money = extreme high entropy at an ever accelerating rate. Bitcoin = the highest form of ordered information ever created, with increasingly LOWER entropy. Some thoughts👇

The permission you're waiting for is never coming.

Lots of people would rather bash @Michael Saylor than talk about how Bitcoin is the highest form of ordered information to ever exist, which lowers its entropy over time, which makes it more predictable and trustworthy over time, which increases its value over time, because it ensures the consensus over its hard capped supply, grows stronger too, which in turn secures the integrity of the stored information. If you are not here, don’t focus on high time preference engagement farming and clout chasing.

Amazing report on heating greenhouses with Bitcoin miners (on amazing Madeira) - by @Joe Nakamoto 🙏

IF capital rotation into the biggest IPOs in recent history really is the source of liquidity/BTC drop, it proves how extremely early we are when people plow their money in: A: the endgame (IPO) of a proper scheme (VC investing) B: stocks, which they will NEVER OWN. Carry on.

🔥 → 🕯️→ 💡 🚶‍♂️ → 🏇 → 🚂 → 🚙 🗂️→ 💾 → 💿 → ☁️ 🖼️ → 📸 → 🎥 →📱 🗣️ → 📜 → 📖 → 📞 → 📻 → 📺 → 🌐 🐚 →🧮→ 🪙 → 💵 → 💳 → Bitcoin 🏛️→🏦→🗑️→🔥

Bitcoiners are basically a merger of preppers and hippies

LIVE: BFM258 w/ @Trey⚡️ THE PRACTICAL GUIDE TO "RETIRING" EARLY WITH BITCOIN🤝 We discuss: 🔸Financial independence vs sovereignty 🔸Is diversification less Bitcoin? 🔸FIRE's permissioned wealth risks 🔸Bitcoin as savings, not investing 🔸From stacking to “coasting” mode