I am currently testing Qwen3 (1B and 4B) locally with Ollama. It is the small model I was looking for to call MCP tools. While it still a bit dumb in its responses, it successfully calls the tools perfectly. No other model of this size can call tools as effectively.
What happened in Spain and Portugal yesterday was pre-apocalyptic. People really understood how fragile our comfort, communications, and security is. Hopefully they will keep that in mind and start rebuilding. GM🌞
The GFY framework
Abstract:
In this note, we explore a whimsical yet insightful relationship between two vectors representing opposing life forces: Good For You (GFY1) and Go Fuck Yourself (GFY2). We formalize the idea that the more something is good for you, the less go fuck yourself is, and vice versa.
Introduction
Life often presents us with choices and experiences that can be broadly categorized as either beneficial or detrimental. To capture this duality mathematically, we define two vectors in an abstract vector space:
GFY1: The Good For You vector, representing positive influences, benefits, and well-being.
GFY2: The Go Fuck Yourself vector, representing negative influences, detriments, and frustration.
Defining the Relationship
Intuitively, these two vectors are inversely related, an increase in one corresponds to a decrease in the other. We express this relationship as:
GFY2 = -GFY1
And consequently:
GFY1 + GFY2 = 0
These equations state that the Go Fuck Yourself vector is the additive inverse of the Good For You vector, and their sum is always zero. This is a profound insight for your life.
Interpretation
When GFY1 points strongly in a positive direction (high benefit), GFY2 points equally strongly in the negative direction (low detriment). Conversely, if GFY2 increases (more frustration), GFY1 decreases (less benefit). The sum of these opposing forces is always zero: GFY1 + GFY2 = 0, which symbolizes the balance (or tension) between good and bad.
This apparently simple equation offers a powerful framework for evaluating life choices. When faced with a decision, we cannot truly assess its GFY1 value (how beneficial it is) without simultaneously contemplating its GFY2 value (how frustrating or detrimental it is), as they inherently influence and define each other. To understand how good something is for you requires understanding how much "go fuck yourself" is contained within it, and vice versa. This interdependent relationship helps us make more holistic assessments, allowing us to prioritize choices that maximize GFY1 while naturally minimizing GFY2 in our lives.
Extensions and Applications
This model can be applied to real-life decision-making, where each choice or event can be represented as a vector in the GFY space. By consciously measuring the magnitude and direction of these vectors, we can make more informed decisions. The GFY framework provides a simple yet powerful tool for navigating complex situations, helping us distinguish between what truly serves our interests and what merely frustrates our progress.
Practical applications might include evaluating job opportunities, relationships, or daily habits. By assessing whether something increases your GFY1 or GFY2 vector, you gain clarity about its true value in your life. This mindful approach to decision-making can lead to greater overall satisfaction and reduced stress.
The next time you face a dilemma, just remember: The more GFY, the less GFY, and vice versa. This perspective can guide you toward healthier choices and a more balanced, fulfilling life.
