Bitcoin (proof of work) is the computation; the measurement. The rule is proof of work. Bitcoin is the “quantum computer”. Except it’s Bitcoin, not quantum. Quantum can’t prove the work (energy). Quantum can’t resolve the double spend of energy/information or the measurement problem WRT time. Quantum has no blocks, no proof. Network = reification of field from outside the temporal boundary. The measurement occurs at each discrete Planck tick of time and superposition is discrete between each Planck tick; it’s “sub-Planck” (sub block; unmined/unmeasured). All positions in time must be binary (classical) and non-contradictory (no double spends) for conservation of energy. There is no such thing as erasure in Landauer’s Principal, its incomplete information of the active state of energy/matter only from within the temporal substrate; you can’t see the historical chain from within. Delete a utxo/historical transaction from the chain and tell me what happens to the proof and conservation. How many blocks is this going to take guys? Who is going to orange pill Wolfram? Who can get me a conversation with him if nobody else is going to do it? Hes trying to understand the utxo model of the reality/physics (energy), except he has no proof of work (joules), no computation. Sorry Stephen, Satoshi beat all of us to Bitcoin. Satoshi solved Turning’s Halting Problem. Bitcoin is complete…we don’t need to build it, it exists now. This has significant implications for mathematics and logic; implications for everything. Bitcoin is not a theory of energy. Bitcoin is not a theory of work. Bitcoins not a model. Bitcoin is proof. The conservation of memory (finite sats and finite bits) using proof of work (joules). Each bit of value (satoshi) is a bit of active memory, the value must exist within physical bits. Temperature is relative to the finite boundary of active memory (supply cap; 21M) Bit-Coin. Measurement is computation. Planck Energy is the temporal constant of work. Plank Temperature is the boundary of thermodynamic memory. What does Bitcoin measure? What does Bitcoin compute? What is a block of time? What is a block of proof? What could be more fundamental than the P2P exchange of memory (money; energy) in physics? Bitcoin is temporal geometry as pure information. Bitcoin is the “theory” of everything; except Bitcoin isn’t a theory, Bitcoin is proof. Just look at it. It’s really painful guys. Just observe Bitcoin objectively……I am just a pleb too. Who actually understands proof of work and the double spend problem? Are we ready to understand Bitcoin as the relationship energy, time and information through computation?Are we really going to allow this quantum nonsense to destroy Bitcoin by ungrounded protocol change? Nobody understands Bitcoin. Don’t trust me, go verify for yourself. Just look at Bitcoin. The Truth speaks for itself. Every Bitcoiner should listen to this and tell Stephen Wolfram to look at Bitcoin and proof of work. He’s telling you quantum physics is a fiat interpretation of energy and time. There is no second best.

Bitcoin is post-quantum by satoshis originaly design. Post-quantum meaning that there is a new sheriff in town. Bitcoin describes and instantiates the quantized nature energy with respect to conservation and a quantized block of time through pure information better than quantum can. There is no second best. Discrete time at Planck = Discrete Superpostion at Planck = Centralized Quantum Computing has built on the wrong ontology (no continuous unitary evolution). Physically its been GG since 09. It’s our minds that lag.

Few truly understand that Bitcoin conserves the cost of demand. The individual can pay the cost of the demand up front, or the nodes can subsidize the cost through irreversible taxation paid in perpetuity. Tax is theft.

Friendly reminder if you devalue the bits you devalue the coins The name is literally Bitcoin. What happens to the relative value of sats versus the bits if we inflate the number of bits per block? SegWit was a soft fork in name only. We are told we “won” the blocksize war, yet I see blocks greater than 1MB. 2,099,999,999,755,528 sats/8,000,000 bits = 262,499,999.969441 sats per bit per block Now it can be down to 2,099,999,999,755,528 sats/32,000,000 bits = 65,624,999.992360 sats per bit per block How does the pricing of a finite blockspace (bitspace) in finite satoshis through the fee market relate to the economics of proof of work and the value of Bitcoin? If Bitcoiners want the value of Bitcoin to “go up”, then why did we devalue the satoshi with respect to the bits per block of time? Why did we distort the relationship and measurement of Bitcoin? I pray we can return to the original sound economics of blockspace Satoshi gave us. How many more blocks will it take for us to find humility in our own folly? Who’s going to have to courage to admit we are all wrong?

@primal why is my primal missing so many notifications? Damus shows me like atleast 50% more notifications and posts that I can’t even see on primal…. Anyone know what’s going on?

@Artel 21 for some reason your notifications aren’t showing on my primal anymore 😵‍💫

So when are we going to have more Bitcoiners telling the world that Satoshi solved Turing’s Halting Problem?

GM, BIP fuel.

I am 100% certain that Bitcoin will have a URSF for the quantum “upgrades”. Quantum will be the most contentious fork in history where Bitcoin’s physics battles fiat physics for control of Bitcoin. As Jeff Booth said, most people will be on the wrong side of the fork. Quantum is the end game fork before Valhalla. The true plebs will resist in the toughest of times. The decentralized quantum computer will stand firm in the physics Satoshi instantiated in Genesis. There is no second best 🫡

Some days it really does feel this way. Other days it feels that it is finished and we are just too early. Too early = Boltzmann2.0