Block, or Chronon Mechanics (Bitcoin) is more fundamental than Block Wave Dynamics (Quantum Mechanics). If your formalism is not describing a quantized reality and architecture of time at the most fundamental unit of quantized change, it is not the most fundamental process. Physics already admits it must be Planck Time. The wave is not the block (chronon) Bitcoin is the study and instantiation of computed quantized time where we can empirically observe its architecture and geometry externally from an inspectable ledger; QM or Block Wave Mechanics is the study of processes occuring over a large multiple of chronons (blocks) of quantized time (Planck). Both an extremely valuable field of study, but only one constructs the logic of the most fundamental process of time. QM is describing the fluid or wave mechanics of numerous blocks. Bitcoin is describing THE block. I have more to say later in a more formal post.

A quantum computer can’t break Bitcoin because it cannot move Genesis. It cannot spend the genesis state. It cannot violate the rules that make a state valid. It cannot compute its way around logic and encryption rule. Logic = Encryption Genesis Block is a fixed coordinate in Timespace. If the origin is immovable, the system is unbreakable. #BitcoinLens #1=1 @PlebNick

Incredibly blessed; lots of work to do. GN

Is Bitcoin a network or a field? Is this question just semantics?

FWIW, I”we would love to talk to Jack Kruse, we could use his help and his knowledge, we have much to say about light and biology from the bitcoin lens perspective. If anyone can reach him, we would love to speak and build together. I’m still not going back to twitter, too much noise there, despite some valuable connections to be made! My account is deleted!

The critiques and discomfort around this paper are expected. We have never been in this position before as a society. Bitcoin places us in unfamiliar territory, and it is natural to reach back into legacy scientific and philosophical frameworks to interpret it. Those systems were built for a different world. They do not yet have the language to describe what Bitcoin makes operational. This work is not final. It will contain errors. It will be revised, sharpened, and corrected through open communal inquiry. But beneath the imperfections of language, the direction is firm: Bitcoin is the ground truth we now have. It is the first system where energy, time, and memory converge into a single observable process. Bitcoin is the only bias-free machine that allows time to be seen as something produced through irreversible commitment rather than assumed as a background parameter. It is a global, open experiment where energy becomes ordered memory and where history advances only through work. Anyone can verify it. No institution controls it. It stands on its own physical operation. Blocks require energy. Commitment produces history. The ledger preserves structure. Bitcoin is a measurable system running on hardware, dissipating energy, and generating a shared causal record of us. Bitcoin operationalizes what physics has struggled to unify: irreversible time, conserved structure, and energy expenditure in one observable object. It is not a toy model. It is the first empirical instance of temporal production. We do not claim perfection in this paper. We claim direction. Direction matters more than polish at the frontier of inquiry. Any model of time, measurement, or physical reality must now pass through the empirical filter Bitcoin provides: irreversible state formation from energy, ordered commitment, and conserved history. If a theory cannot account for that structure, it is incomplete. This is not a replacement for physics. It is the anchor physics must now orient around. Bitcoin is the substrate. Bitcoin is the first complete formal system that produces variable truth through energy across discrete time. The burden is no longer on Bitcoin to justify itself to legacy models. The burden is on those models to explain why they cannot account for what Bitcoin makes empirically undeniable. We invite criticism, refinement, and participation. This is a living document and a collective effort. This paper is only a genesis point, a public beginning. There is much more to articulate and explore beyond what is written in the original paper, and we will continue to develop and express these ideas openly. If Bitcoin is not the object through which temporal production, measurement, and irreversible causality can be studied empirically, then name the alternative. Otherwise, this is where the work begins. We are the upgrade. Any help will be appreciated by Bitcoin. @PlebNick