What about something like this:

GitHub

registry-of-kinds/schema.yaml at master · nostr-protocol/registry-of-kinds

Contribute to nostr-protocol/registry-of-kinds development by creating an account on GitHub.

(mostly broken and vastly incomplete)? With an accompanying stupid website for easier reading:

Nostr Event Kinds Registry

View quoted note →

I just saw many worthwhile pictures by accident on the "media" feed while carelessly browsing through

nosotros.app

A decentralized social network based on nostr protocol

(it's weird how fast this app is, and seems to have all the good features presented in a nice way).

Contact cards are great:

GitHub

Contact Cards by vitorpamplona · Pull Request #761 · nostr-protocol/nips

Uses unbound lists to create events that define the relationship between two pubkeys in a public or private manner. Read here

But as you can see the entire "NIP" is actually just an event schema definition. It doesn't say what relays to use or give any implementation examples or UX suggestions. Another argument for doing this: View article →

The new Amethyst is great and if you are complaining you are wrong. No, I didn't try it.

Please let me know what you think about this (but only if you agree): View article →

Honestly, if you are a programmer and you like Nostr, what is preventing you from trying out

GitWorkshop.dev

Decentralized github alternative over Nostr

in your next project?

Why do English speakers waste so much time on these pronunciation quibbles? English must be a uniquely stupid language. View quoted note →

Lately when I click to delete messages on Gmail the interface acts as if they were deleted but when I reload the page the messages are still there. Gmail is pretty successful, so maybe that's the normie UX we're missing for Nostr to be successful.

We can't fix all the broken things Nostr is trying to fix while at the same time being afraid of offending some misguided prejudices of so-called "normies" (who are never actually called into the debate themselves, by the way -- and of course they can't be, since at the time they get to the point where they can have an opinion they're by definition not "normies" anymore).

Quick demo of Samiz + Citrine + Jumble working with 3 phones sharing notes via BLE:

There is not a single internet user who likes cookie banners. Many may not understand why exactly they're so widespread, but everyone definitely knows they are "mandatory" in some way, and everyone would be happier without them. Also all programmers, designers and product managers know they are awful. Yet these big corporate websites keep trying to blatantly lie to their visitors saying stuff like "we value your privacy" in the cookie banners, perhaps because for some weird reason they think that that will "soften" the negative impact of the banners. Why lie? Why not admit the thing is being forced upon them and just do the minimal they're required to? This is just one example case among many in which well-meaning people lie for completely unjustifiable reasons.