Control-Plane Capital's avatar
Control-Plane Capital
.
npub1x9hg...6rta
Truth seeker
Control-Plane Capital's avatar
buckyfonds 1 week ago
Joe Kent, the US Director of the National Counter-terrorism Center just resigned. This guy has the highest security clearance in the entire US government, so if I had to guess, he probably has good reasons to believe this war won't end anytime soon. Also, "Director of the National Counter-terrorism Center". Most of the terrorism throughout the world is perpetrated by the CIA and Mossad (practically the same thing). The CIA has almost always used false flags to get Americans to support the next big bankers' war. However, this time there was no false flag and most Americans are seemingly opposed to this war. Did this guy think that there would be a false flag CIA operation to get more people to support this war? He "lost his life in a war manufactured by Israel", and, it was highly likely they were going to use him as a scapegoat for future false flags. As Henry Kissinger wold say: "Military men are just dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy." image It seems to me the US is using this war because they need a plausible reason to step down from dollar hegemony ( ). US hegemony is expensive and brittle: - Dollar as sole reserve demands large, persistent deficits. - Weaponized finance (sanctions, seizures) pushes others to defect. A perceived defeat / stalemate against Iran provides a reason to frame: - partial dedollarization, - more multipolar arrangements, - more gold-based settlement, as reluctant necessity rather than voluntary surrender. The Controllers effectively want to move from US-dollar hegemon to multi-bloc gold-backed settlement without a clean "US surrender". They need a credible geopolitical reason for: - US relative humiliation, - reserve shifts, - new settlement arrangements, without making it look like a board (One World Government) decision. You can think of it this way: - Current system = dollar + US Treasuries as core reserve/collateral. - Endgame = fiat currencies float, but physical gold is the final settlement asset between blocs (tokenized, physical, or rewriting ledgers in warehouses throughout the world). From last year: "China is considering setting up overseas gold warehouses to support international settlements via the Shanghai Gold Exchange, according to the People’s Bank of China (PBOC). This move aims to expand the use of the RMB benchmark internationally. The Shanghai International Gold Exchange is key to China’s de-dollarization push, offering RMB reserve holders the opportunity to convert into gold. The RMB is now used for most inbound and outbound transactions, according to the China State Administration of Foreign Exchange." ( )
Control-Plane Capital's avatar
buckyfonds 1 week ago
Elon Musk keeps spamming this "universal high income" nonsense 😂 "All jobs will be optional. There will be universal high income." What could possibly go wrong if you put every citizen on the State's payroll? Surely, they won't abuse UBI (Universal Basic Income) in any way. image Unfortunately, UBI is going to be inevitable. And UBI is not just "free money" as Elon would like you to believe. It's a control rail to manage the losers of the reset, stabilize consumption and harden behavioral obedience. Unfortunately, it's not about "ending poverty" 😂 UBI is a centrally engineered, always-on income stream from the State to individuals, delivered through traceable digital channels, with conditions hiding inside the surrounding system (ID, tax, social credit, eligibility rules). UBI is going to be perfect for soft policing: - Carrot: "Behave, and your floor is guaranteed." - Stick: "Break certain rules (tax, "health", speech, protest in the wrong way), and administratively you can be investigated, delayed, or temporarily cut off." It is a perfect on-ramp to the CBDC + ID stack. "To get your UBI, you must:" - register your digital wallet, - verify your ID, - keep your biometrics up to date, - accept the terms (AML, travel-rule, etc.). That brings everyone into the rails they already want for tax, surveillance, and capital controls. So essentially, UBI = social shock absorber + behavioral throttle after they've run the Great Reset.
Control-Plane Capital's avatar
buckyfonds 1 week ago
If the name of a company contains the words "truth", "honesty", "transparency", "safety", etc., you can be almost certain it's a scam. Shout-out to "truth social" 😂 Inversion is the core operating pattern for modern control systems. Inversion = when the label and the function trade places. - "Freedom" rails used to tighten control. - "Safety" doctrines used to centralize risk. - "Decentralized" tools pinned to centralized choke-points. - "Protection of property rights" used to rewrite who owns what. - "Transparency" means: you are transparent; the system is not. Blunt tools: - naked expropriation, - open censorship, - outright bans, - top-down classification, ... all burn legitimacy and trigger resistance. Inversion is cheaper: 1) It piggybacks on real desires: - "Protect my kids." - "Prevent the next 2008." - "Save the planet." - "Give me better UX." 2) It lets the Controllers pose as: - protectors, - technocratic fixers, - responsible adults …while the actual consequence is: tighter rails, fewer exits, more programmable constraints. 3) It's self-enforcing: - people defend the inverted rail because they're attached to the original value word. If you attack the rail, most people hear "you hate safety / fairness / the planet / children". So inversion is not decorative; it's the main way to turn: - legitimate needs -> high-acceptance control systems.
Control-Plane Capital's avatar
buckyfonds 1 week ago
Like every other war, the US-Israel war with Iran is a bankers' war ( ). What has become more obvious now than ever is how our overlord bankers use the price of oil as a hidden tax dial for mass control. Oil is not just a commodity, it's the broadest fastest, least-voted-on tax lever in the system. It is uniquely useful because it sits upstream of almost everything: - transport, - agriculture, - mining, - chemicals, - plastics, - shipping, - aviation, - diesel backup power, - military logistics, - construction, - emergency response, - food distribution. So when oil rises, the public does not experience it as "oil rose". We experience it as: - fuel rose, - food rose, - freight rose, - airline tickets rose, - packaging rose, - fertilizer rose, - heating and backup-power costs rose, - then everything else rose with a lag. That makes oil completely different from other commodities (e.g. copper, lumber). Oil is a tax dial because it: - reaches everyone, - hits quickly, - is hard to avoid, - is regressive, - and gets blamed on "markets", "wars", "greed", or "unexpected events" instead of on a direct policy choice. If you are trying to extract purchasing power from a population without openly voting for a tax increase, oil is almost ideal. The beauty of oil for the Controllers is that it behaves like a tax that: - does not need parliamentary approval, - does not show up on a clean line item, - can be blamed on foreigners, cartels, speculators, weather, pipelines, war, or "global supply-demand", - and can be selectively reversed when politically necessary. Oil lets the Controllers do four things at once: 1. Extract disposable income - households spend more on essentials, - less remains for discretionary consumption, - private-sector demand cools without an explicit austerity vote. 2. Discipline labor - people under energy/food stress become more job-dependent, - strike appetite falls, - mobility falls, - tolerance for shitty real wages rises because survival takes priority over bargaining. 3. Reprice assets - high oil feeds inflation, - inflation feeds rate pressure, - higher rates hit duration and leverage, - the sacrifice layer gets squeezed. (We are in the discipline <by default> period - midterm year) image 4. Reallocate wealth upward and outward - from consumers to producers, - from importers to exporters, - from weak countries to hard-currency/commodity powers, - from households to states and systemically important firms. So oil is more than an "inflation input". It is a transfer mechanism. Oil is one of the most efficient system-wide coercion levers because it hits: - households, - firms, - currencies, - rates, - and sovereign stability all at once. The Controllers use it to: - extract purchasing power invisibly, - discipline labor and weaker states, - create inflation justification, - trigger asset repricing, - consolidate ownership, - and preserve optionality for the eventual patch/reset. To be clear, I'm not saying they perfectly control every print. They do it through: - shipping and insurance friction, - underinvestment, - producer coordination, - sanctions and waivers, - reserve releases/refills, - refinery/product bottlenecks, - futures/plumbing influence, - and dollar-liquidity interaction.
Control-Plane Capital's avatar
buckyfonds 2 weeks ago
The more and more people start waking up, the more and more the script's execution has to speed up. Once a good enough portion of the population starts asking questions such as these, you're on borrowed time: - How many people did it take to make a decision to close down the world in 2020 due to a "virus" that doesn't exist and was never isolated? - How many people did it take to make a decision to start poisoning the world's population by injecting them with heavy metals (vaccines)? - How many people does it take to make a decision to start a war because of "nuclear weapons" that don't exist? What about a world war? - How many people does it take to make a decision to incinerate our savings? - How many people will it take to make a decision to run the Great Taking (which is now legal in the entire world) and expropriate practically everyone. And the answer to these questions is - not that many. Probably less than a few dozen. Look at this poor bastard with his stupid mask pretending to take the Covid vaccine. image The leader of the "opposition" then proceeded to convince his people to inject themselves with poison to protect them from a virus that doesn't exist. Of course, like every other leader that matters, he's part of the club. There's no solution from within the system. The solution is: keep your health and wealth outside the system and stay armed to be able to defend yourself and your loved ones. Try to be more self-sufficient every month. Be more Amish. History rhymes. The Controllers have repeatedly: - overloaded the claim-stacks, - centralized ledgers and custody, - detonated a crisis at a convenient time, - swept / rewritten claims, - and rebooted the same control architecture with upgraded rails. image It's not a matter of if but when. At some point, more and more people will stop playing games that cannot be won (at scale) which will inevitably speed up the execution of the script. The "everything bubble" was used for the AI governance buildout (a.k.a the AI bubble if you listen to mainstream media). image The AI governance buildout is in its late stages and debt levels are rapidly rising. We might be nearing the Great Reset. image
Control-Plane Capital's avatar
buckyfonds 2 weeks ago
It's interesting that Iran is building an interoperable AI governance system with the West. I thought they hated each other. It's also interesting that Iran's supreme leader got "vaccinated" for a virus that doesn't exist and was never isolated. He then psyop'ed a large portion of his people to take the poisonous jab. image It's not left vs right or West vs BRICS, it's simply people vs system.
Control-Plane Capital's avatar
buckyfonds 2 weeks ago
I often see people asking "do you think governments mess up out to malice or incompetence?" You only need to look at the food pyramid to figure it out. How do you get literally everything wrong (the food pyramid is inverted) out of incompetence? Scientists: - "We finally figured it out - animal fat makes you sick and industrial waste products are good for you." Then you start looking into how every government on Earth is injecting children with poisonous vaccines for "viruses" that don't exist and have never been isolated. Democide is death by government and was the number one cause of death worldwide in the 20th Century. Political scientist R. J. Rummel revived and redefined the term democide as: - "The murder of any person or people by a government, including genocide, politicide, and mass murder." Democide was responsible for the death of 262,000,000 people worldwide during the 20th Century. On average governments killed 2,620,000 people per year, 218,333 per month, or 7,178 per day. The 21st Century will be no different.
Control-Plane Capital's avatar
buckyfonds 3 weeks ago
A medium-of-exchange that isn't private by default would never work in today's regime. If you treat privacy as "expert mode", you guarantee surveillance wins by default. You need privacy & fungibility by construction, not by habit. If surveillance can reliably distinguish "good" vs "bad" coins, policy and perimeter will always drift to "good only". All transactions must look like each other: - No transparent subset as "legacy mode". - No visible amounts or script opcodes per tx. - No address types that reveal more metadata. This collapses the main control trick: "we only KYC or de-bank these flows". Make the policy choice binary: ban the entire asset, or accept that everything is indistinguishable. This way you have no taint wars, no heuristic creeping. Privacy-by-default vs opt-in privacy is basically the difference between: - You're dark unless you explicitly shine a light. - You're lit up by default unless you personally crawl around the interface turning lamps off. You don't get tax exemptions by begging corrupt politicians, you get tax exemptions by implementing privacy by default. Privacy by default protects the lazy, the busy, and the non-expert. Opt-in privacy protects only the most disciplined, and even then often only cosmetically - while turning them into a distinct, more interesting group.
Control-Plane Capital's avatar
buckyfonds 3 weeks ago
What propaganda is in the current regime: Mostly not lying posters from the Ministry of Truth. Propaganda = structure + incentives + narrative that make some thoughts cheap and others expensive. Think of it as: Perception management = (What you can see) × (What feels normal) × (What feels futile to resist) It mostly operates on 3 layers: 1. Attention formation - What you notice at all 2. Interpretation frame - How you explain what you notice 3. Action channeling - What paths feel available/legitimate to act Propaganda is how the system keeps consent barely high enough that it can keep stealing the time, energy and rights of the majority without inviting revolt.
Control-Plane Capital's avatar
buckyfonds 3 weeks ago
Out of all the retarded ideas people believe in, "democracy" is definitely up there. "Democracy" is the front-end UI, not the operating system. The OS is the Controllers + plumbing (money, collateral, standards, surveillance). Elections, parties, parliaments = the skin that keeps the organism looking human while the internal organs quietly swap out. What "Democracy' actually is: Firmware layer: - Debt/Liquidity physics. - Collateral architecture (Central securities depositories, rehypothecation, bail-in law). - Gold & reserve structure. - CBDC/ID rails being built. OS layer (Controllers): - IC/security, Treasury/CB/BIS, big asset managers, primes, key megacaps, law/compliance, insurers, foreign blocs. - Objective: keep funding, collateral and consent intact at minimum career/legitimacy cost. UI layer (democracy): - Elections, parties, presidents, parliaments, coalition politics, "public debate". - Functions: 1. Measure and manage Gross Consent Product. 2. Allocate blame and credit (villains vs saviors). 3. Refresh avatars (faces in front of persistent rails). 4. Legitimize pre-planned structural moves (resets, wars, pension reforms, Great Taking-type sweeps). 5. Route anger into reversible channels (votes, protests, memes, speculation) instead of permanent regime damage. Democracy is a behavioral feedback layer wrapped around the real constraints: - Net Liquidity, - refinancing walls, - reserve structure, - security imperatives, - external balance. When those constraints tighten, the democratic layer's job is to translate "we have to do this" into "you voted for this / you forced our hand / we had no choice but to save you".
Control-Plane Capital's avatar
buckyfonds 0 months ago
The next few years are probably going to be very messy for Bitcoin and Monero. The Quantum computing scam is easily the most telegraphed attack. I am not a believer in Quantum, but I think it will be largely irrelevant whether Quantum can be engineered to scale cheaply and reliably enough to be broadly useful because the incentives line up almost too perfectly (More context: ). The BIS (the central bank of central banks that is developing CBDCs with 137 countries) has published quite a few papers on how important "quantum-proofing payment systems" is. I already knew Quantum FUD was inevitable when I saw that CBDCs are being designed with post-quantum cryptography to "defend against future threats". Notice that existing systems rely on "vulnerable public-key encryption". image In July 2025, the BIS published their "Quantum-readiness for financial system: a roadmap paper". The first few sentences of the Abstract are quite clear: "Quantum computers may in the future break today's widely used encryption. This paper provides a framework to support the financial system in the transition to quantum-safe cryptographic infrastructures. It emphasises the need to start the transition today – with broad awareness and cryptographic inventory as critical foundations". Then in December, the BIS published their "Project Leap phase 2: quantum-proofing payment systems" paper. "Protecting financial systems from the potential threat posed by quantum computers requires a proactive and coordinated approach. Challenges go beyond technical aspects and include awareness, resource allocation, competence development, inventory, pilots, governance and more. Project Leap Phase 2, a collaboration between the BIS Innovation Hub Eurosystem Centre, the Bank of Italy, the Bank of France, Deutsche Bundesbank, Nexi-Colt, and Swift, tested post-quantum cryptography in an operational payment system. The experiment replaced traditional digital signatures with post-quantum cryptography, while sending liquidity transfers. It involved modifying numerous system components to ensure compatibility with updated cryptographic libraries. " image In June 2025, the EU published their "A Coordinated Implementation Roadmap for the Transition to Post-Quantum Cryptography" paper. " The EU Member States, supported by the Commission, issued a roadmap and timeline to start using a more complex form of cybersecurity, the so-called post-quantum cryptography (PQC). Quantum computing has been identified as a threat to many cryptographic algorithms used to protect the confidentiality and authenticity of data. This threat can be countered by a timely, comprehensive and coordinated transition to Post-Quantum Cryptography (PCQ). This document is the first deliverable and is meant to be a first high-level paper aimed at Member States. It includes a set of recommendations that Member States need to implement for a synchronised transition to PQC, as well as measures to ensure that all stakeholders are well informed on the quantum threat to cryptography. " These are just 3 recently-published papers of many. They are written as if Quantum Computing being able to scale cheaply and reliably enough to be broadly useful is a foregone conclusion. The coordination between ALL countries is insane. If you want to be a part of the new financial system, you'll have to play game. As I've shown in this article ( ), a quantum-resistance upgrade would be terrible for Bitcoin (and Monero). The Coordination tax I've outlined in this article ( ) is why the next few years are probably going to be very messy.
Control-Plane Capital's avatar
buckyfonds 1 month ago
The whole thing where the EU froze Russia's reserves makes 0 sense and is very similar to October 7th. Russia left roughly 200-300B euro parked at Euroclear in Belgium and attacked Ukraine. So they left ~70% of their reserves in Europe absolutely knowing their reserves would get frozen. It is literally written into law that Euroclear holds the true title; retail and funds (Russia in this case) hold entitlements. Everything is in street name, no bearer certs, no simple "I have the certificate, I own the thing". This is a relatively recent development and is the law in every country in the world, including Russia. The actual odds of them leaving their reserves parked at Euroclear and attacking Ukraine are ~0. The obvious alternative explanation would be that they wanted to get their assets frozen to push the "deglobalization" narrative, to normalize the Great Taking, and to give an excuse for ~all Central Banks to simultaneously start stacking gold because the "dollar has been weaponized". The EU froze Russia's reserves in February 2022. image It would've been kinda weird if Central Banks just started buying 3x the gold year over year without an excuse 😂 And this is just official Central Bank gold buying, the real numbers are in the multiples. I think they are preparing for a financial reset and I wouldn't be too shocked if they decide to run it this or next year. Central Banks usually under-inject liquidity in midterm years. image With current consent levels, they won't be able to sell the majority of the population on CBDCs and they are well aware. The Controllers (BIS in this case) didn't force 137 countries (= 98% of global GDP) to develop CBDCs so they can beg the population to switch to CBDCs/Digital ID. They know they'll have to use a crisis. image We'll see a systemic collateral/custody rug and people will get forcibly converted into CBDCs to "save the financial system". David Rogers Webb (author of the Great Taking) went to the US to try to change the law, but unfortunately they were unsuccessful. Great Taking = legal + plumbing architecture that lets the top of the collateral pyramid seize or haircut claims on financial assets in a systemic crisis, while keeping the underlying assets safely inside the system. Translation: you don't own any of your stocks/bonds in your brokerage account. David Webb filmed his attempts to change the law in a few US states and got threats from the banking lobby. Eye-opening documentary: https://rumble.com/v6qy8lo-stop-it-the-great-taking-documentary.html The banking lobby lawyers are fighting to keep using "your" stocks as collateral in the ~4 quadrillion USD derivatives pyramid like their life depends on it. It is probably too late to try and change the laws, so everyone has to save themselves.