The Revenue Commissioners' “Gender Pay Gap Report” for 2024¹ says:
“Revenue has made important strides in fostering gender parity and in mitigating its gender pay gap. Since 2017, female representation across all senior management grades has significantly increased and has now reached 56 per cent.”
[1]: downloadable from
Gender pay gap
This page details the reporting from Revenue on the gender pay gap
However, a table on page 1 tells us that in 2019, the balance in senior management was 50/50, so from the point of view of “gender parity”, the organization has regressed since 2019. Is “gender parity” just code for “advancing the interests of women”?
It can't be that “gender parity” refers to pay parity, since the passage above clearly regards “gender parity” and the “gender pay gap” as two different things.
The balance between the sexes is particularly lopsided at the Principal Officer grade, with 63% of employees being women. (See page 7, top row.)