regtest is pretty neat, I'm disappointed I didn't invest time into learning about it until now. I don't like that electrsd will download binaries for you though...

Has anyone compiled a CTV summary site? I remember someone compiled a survey of thought leaders' opinions on CTV, but while that could be part of what I'm imagining, I'm thinking about a page that addresses key objections, tries to exhaustively list applications, links to WIP implementations, etc. I'm pretty much on board already (I could actually benefit from CTV for one of my projects today), I just need to be convinced we've delved the unknown-unknowns well enough.

@hodlbod what does the "Broadcast" button do exactly? I was hoping to rebroadcast a post with my new list of preferred relays, but it's not clear if that's what it did (It didn't really look like it).

My favorite nostr feature is not knowing if your WoT score is high enough for the intended recipient to even see your message...

@npub1teawtzxh6y02cnp9jphxm2q8u6xxfx85nguwg6ftuksgjctvavvqnsgq5u Verifying My Public Key: "ademan555"

@npub1teawtzxh6y02cnp9jphxm2q8u6xxfx85nguwg6ftuksgjctvavvqnsgq5u Verifying My Public Key: "@Ademan555"

@DETERMINISTIC OPTIMISM 🌞 @ODELL @Gigi Do you guys throw opensats applications without references right in the trash? I was very much a lurker in the bitcoin space for over a decade before I finally got off my rear last year (thanks rust-bitcoin and bdk!). While I've interacted with plenty of people, and made some public contributions, most of my community interaction is non-technical. I have a day job so it's unfortunately pretty minimal in terms of relationship building with people who can vouch for my work.

Merry Christmas, nostriches!

@Zach Meyer how does seeking on flare.pub work? It seems (to my semi-layperson eyes) that it shouldn't, there's no HLS or similar support, yet it does.

twitter is having a moment, lfg!!

I still think label based communities are a better model than nip-72

#asknostr Hey @waxwing I figure you're the guy to ask here. If I'm building a coinjoin but want to *consolidate* two outputs from separate participants which are going to the same recipient, how can all participants validate that their coins are accounted for in the outputs *without* sharing their destinations and amounts with all other participants? I assume this is possible, but I'm struggling to construct it. ex A sending 1BTC to D B sending 1BTC to E C sending 2BTC to D Ideally, the outputs would be 3BTC to D 1BTC to E But how can participants differentiate that from 2BTC to D 1BTC to E 1BTC to F (without knowing the destinations of each participant's coins, ruining all unlinkability) I've had a few ideas, but I've run into a brick wall every time. Blinded addition seems not to be useful, since you need to first prove you have contributed enough in inputs which seems to necessitate linking your blinded value to the inputs, ahead of time, negating the value of blinded addition? I hope I'm missing something obvious (or even a paper doing exactly this?)

Refreshed coracle and it is just loading a blank page now on Chromium Desktop. ``` Error with Permissions-Policy header: Origin trial controlled feature not enabled: 'attribution-reporting'. Error with Permissions-Policy header: Origin trial controlled feature not enabled: 'run-ad-auction'. Error with Permissions-Policy header: Origin trial controlled feature not enabled: 'join-ad-interest-group'. Error with Permissions-Policy header: Origin trial controlled feature not enabled: 'browsing-topics'. ``` Followed by lots of errors related to bugsnag logged in the console, and an error posting to dufflepud.onrender.com