waxwing

I did this. It worked. Cool software! nostr:nevent1qqsz6wf0wasxgqdmclwu6rndqudcngnd9fj3a0u5yp26f2cjj40q7scpzpmhxue69uhhxmmvda3k7tnwdshsyg890lkqeqpw46kd0usyya7ak8uxa25juck2m5xjd9cgfj6wx9fmlqpsgqqqqqqsdydpdl

If you plan on creating a new tech/wallet/project in bitcoin, be sure to set aside several days to choose a name that isn't already taken by some altcoin or token.

Gave a presentation last week on "purecoin", showing basically how ~ 50% embedding rate in "pure" bitcoin transactions with no scripts is inevitable *even if* you force the outputs to prove they are not "fake". 'Fraid the audience had no idea what I was talking about, so I'll post the pdf here: https://files.catbox.moe/tpfc4x.pdf I must apologize for calling it a "very hard fork" because you could actually do it as a soft fork (thanks nostr:nprofile1qqsw79gu0guq7s98t473fyavx3akwaafmx6l5z4rehd50lrcl2mf4zcprfmhxue69uhkzer4d36zuvfcwpk82uewwdhkx6tpdshsz9mhwden5te0v96xcctn9ehx7um5wghxcctwvshsz9thwden5te0wfjkccte9ejxzmt4wvhxjme094u090 ) but it's hardly relevant. The point is that there is no version of Bitcoin, even a 99% crippled version of it that doesn't allow L2s, that does not allow data embedding, *except* one in which we completely change the cryptography to BLS (any deterministic signature scheme could in theory do it, but nobody is going to seriously suggest hash-based signatures or RSA FDH I think) (thanks nostr:nprofile1qqsrtnjl8xtejc4k7h38gz6akjv0v75vrsdhlznu0slr2n3tatf8w3qpzpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezumt0d5hs64xj85 for thoughts on this), *and* totally cripple any programmability. And since quantum is coming (so they tell me!) I see basically no chance of this happening. #bitcoin #cryptography

Wtf! (also not working here) nostr:nevent1qqs9g55859gcsxsm4m2q5qsf9e9yk5lgzx9pd8475pqtf6jjpde6zcqpg3mhxw309ahhsarjv3jhvctkxc685d35093rw7pkwf4xwdrww3a8z6ngv4jx6dtzx4ax5ut4d36kw6mwdpa8ydpkdeunyutzv9jzummwd9hkutczyq7ju52ss6vlnrc090d70fzmvu7xsllxgg85vmwzjmvshyyd282egqcyqqqqqqguxrcsp