Current state of Bitcoin Core
Super Testnet
npub1yxp7...399s
Open source dev w/ bitcoin focus | supertestnet.org
bc1qefhunyf8rsq77f38k07hn2e5njp0acxhlheksn
I've been playing around with Floresta a lot lately, reporting bugs and testing what it can do
I often see it discussed as a solution for storage-limited nodes: you can prune blocks *and* prune the utxo set
I'm starting to think it can do more.
Specifically, I want to experiment with running it *with* a full blockchain, while *not* storing the utxo set. Spam has grown the utxo set to 12GB+. What if utreexo/floresta fixes this? What if you can have a full archival node, but your "utxo set" only uses a few kilobytes?

GitHub
GitHub - vinteumorg/Floresta: A fully-validating Bitcoin node powered by Utreexo, with an integrated Electrum Server
A fully-validating Bitcoin node powered by Utreexo, with an integrated Electrum Server - vinteumorg/Floresta
Matthew Krabber is at it again!
The filters work perfectly at their main job: keeping filtered content out of your mempool
When widely adopted they also delay the propagation of spam-filled blocks, which provides a nice monetary incentive for miners to ignore spam: ignoring spam = fewer blocks orphaned = higher income
Matthew Krabber illustrates the rise of Knots since April
Introducing Matthew Krabber