Or misdirection? 🤔 View quoted note →

Is Davos an exercise in conditioning the public to their plans?

I’ll take the other side of the argument and say that AI will have a better answer than most people can provide. Human arguments are full of flaws - lack of data to support what they wish to claim, biases, prone to fallacies and easily misinterpret what they hear. This could not be more evident than on nostr. For the most part, AI can overcome all of these limitations if prompted responsibly, looking at all the arguments and counter arguments, connecting dots to see the bigger picture, avoid bias and common fallacies. To outright reject this is to say “I’m not gonna bother looking at what you know because I’m convinced I’m right”. Treat AI as a partner to supplement your thought process, not replace it. To enrich your knowledge, not override it. Use it as a stepping stone for exploration rather than a definitive answer. View quoted note →

Muting in Damus doesn’t work anymore?

Strong coffee + Vivaldi 🎻 = 😻 😌

New thing I started doing: when I learn something new and complicated, I record a note of myself trying to explain it. I pretend like it’s a podcast episode and I’m the host and I have to explain the thing to my listeners. If I can’t explain it well, I know I didn’t comprehend it fully yet.

My instant like bot is very consistent and always keeps me company 🤣

Don’t be lame. This crap won’t fly here. View quoted note →