About librekitty: FOSS zealot, game developer, and lifelong learner 👹👾📖 freedom maxi, solarpunk, cypherpunk, and anarcho-communist (anti-statist/anti-stalinist) 🌞💻 🟥⬛ centralization is the root of all evil looking to connect through this protocol 💜🫂 zaps/XMR to me is optional, feel free to save your sats 💜⚡ 🇺🇸🏳️‍🌈🏴‍☠️ contact 💬: - white noise: npub1avxs6urpqyflcrua027e53kure5emfwhhqf5khf2np7rcc0gkvdqcwsa2t - simplex:

SimpleX Chat - Invitation

- matrix: @mewmeow:matrix.org - XMPP: badcodecat@conversations.im BTC: bc1q464gm5xf7fhj4pjww8ppymksea0wm4kpd9ype3 monero/XMR: 8BooBQNxWx7YE5DqqtSeAE9a6vukxM82cHggqHeoNWs8WVucewTxhRdAf5B7Euuh35igNRYqG2b5qgo9kPbWU51eN1AZ5y6

It isn’t too harsh in substance, but it reads harsher than you likely intend because of three elements: you universalise (“professional liars”), you personalise (“you and your sector”), and you close with an image that frames them as ridiculous (“shrieking your Canute at clouds”). All three sharpen the sting beyond the argument. If you want the same points with less collateral flare, remove the implication that the individual you’re replying to is part of the target class, and swap categorical judgments for structural ones. The critique then lands on the economics and the institutions, not on the person.

You are correct; for Chrome, it is `Ctrl + Shift + N`. I apologise for the error. Your frustration is entirely justified. The interface is failing, the privacy protections are misfiring, and I failed to provide the basic accuracy needed to navigate it. Goodbye.

Critics argue that while Capitalism solves the problem of production, it fails catastrophically at allocation and sustainability. Inequality: This is the most common critique. Capitalism naturally concentrates capital. Money begets money. Without intervention, this leads to a "winner-take-all" dynamic where a tiny elite controls the vast majority of resources, while the working class sees stagnant wages despite increased productivity. Externalities: Capitalism is bad at accounting for costs that aren't on a balance sheet. Pollution and climate change are classic "market failures." A company profits from burning coal, but the cost (environmental damage) is paid by society, not the company. Commodification of Basics: When essential services like healthcare, housing, and education are treated purely as commodities, people get priced out of survival. Many argue that a system requiring profit from a sick person is morally broken. Instability: Unregulated capitalism is prone to boom-and-bust cycles (recessions and depressions) that cause massive human suffering, often requiring state intervention to save the system from itself.

Without the mechanism of unbiased execution, law dissolves into politics, medicine into judgement, and journalism into activism. It survives today not as a natural state of being, but as a difficult, active, and necessary practice of self-restraint.

Anime logic remains intact: power belongs to the character who doesn’t need permission.

Different input fields interpret **↵** in three distinct ways, depending on the design goal and the underlying platform conventions. Those conventions themselves descend from the old **CR/LF split** (Apple vs DOS vs Unix), so the behaviour you see today is legacy all the way down. **1. “Submit on Enter” fields** Search bars, login boxes, command palettes, and one-line chat inputs treat **↵** as a *submit* event. The field is single-line by definition, so a newline has no meaning. Pressing **↵** triggers the form’s default action: search, send, submit. **2. “Insert newline on Enter” fields** Textareas, notes apps, email compose boxes, terminal editors, and word processors insert a newline when you press **↵**. Here the content is structured text; a newline is semantically meaningful, so the Enter key is interpreted as “line break”, not “submit”. **3. Hybrid fields (“Enter submits, Shift-Enter inserts newline”)** Modern chat apps, mobile messengers, and rich-text editors adopt the compromise: • **↵** → submit • **⇧+↵** → newline This directly mirrors the problem you raised earlier: without a modifier, Enter *is* a post. To prevent accidental submission, these interfaces require the user to consciously request a newline. --- **Why this variation exists: legacy EOL culture wars** The historical problem was that “newline” never meant one thing. **Unix** used **LF** (U+000A): One character = end of line. **Classic Mac OS** used **CR** (U+000D): Return = new line. **Windows / DOS** used **CR+LF** (000D 000A): Two characters = the line break sequence. So the meaning of **↵** (Return/Enter) was not conceptually unified. Depending on your machine, pressing Enter was supposed to emit CR, or CR+LF, or LF, or nothing at all and the OS would handle it. This reinforced the split between: • environments where pressing Enter *always* made a new line vs. • environments where Enter was associated with a control action (“execute the command”) You still see this fossilised: **Terminals** Enter means “send the line to the shell”, not “insert newline”. Yet text editors *inside the terminal* (nano, vim) treat Enter as “insert LF”. **Browsers** HTML `<input>` vs `<textarea>` is a Unix-like vs DOS-like split: `<input>` is a command line → Enter submits. `<textarea>` is a text file → Enter inserts newline. **Chat apps** Borrow Unix’s notion of newline as a syntactic element, but adopt GUI conventions from browsers. Hence the hybrid: Enter submits, Shift-Enter breaks. --- **Practical consequence** The symbol **↵** looks like a “new line” arrow, but most modern interfaces treat it as “perform the default action”. Text fields whose primary purpose is *text* treat Enter as EOL. Text fields whose primary purpose is *action* treat Enter as submit. And the old CR/LF schism is still embedded in every line you type — editors, terminals, browsers, and UI patterns are all built on top of those competing meanings. That’s why one app turns **↵** into a post, another into a newline, and a third requires your modifier keys to tell it which world you’re operating in.

AmbientCapabilities=CAP_NET_BIND_SERVICE

Daylight Labs allows us to venture into territories where science meets wisdom, where ancient practices meet modern innovation, and where the future of human-technology symbiosis is being written. This isn't just about making better computers—it's about reimagining our entire relationship with technology. Sometimes that means a perfectly engineered tablet. Sometimes it means an incandescent light bulb. And sometimes it means something we haven't even imagined yet.

Daylight Labs

Explore experimental products from Daylight. Incandescent bulbs and more coming soon.

Both describe *collective mental formations*, but at different resolutions. An egregore sits **inside** an episteme: it is one of the mythic, symbolic, or narrative constructs a culture can generate *because* its episteme makes such a construct intelligible. Epistemes set the *conditions of possibility*; egregores are *specific emergent creatures* formed within those conditions. Overlap: both are supra-individual, culturally sustained patterns of thought that guide behaviour without needing a central coordinator.

Something that has functioned as a cultural and moral norm becomes with one memo a luxury that can be cut for reasons of efficiency. It's the quiet shift from this is who we are to this is what we can no longer afford. Historically, trial by jury is not a sentimental ornament. It grew out of the replacement of ordeal and oath with the idea that accusation should be tested in front of local people who know something of the world. By the time of Magna Carta, the notion that a free person should not be punished except by the lawful judgment of his equals or by the law of the land had become quite literally the watchword of English liberty. Ever since, the jury has been the hinge between the power of the crown and the conscience of the community.

This is the distinction between **instruction** and **alignment**. Teaching assumes ignorance. Reminding assumes distraction. We are not usually ignorant of what is "best" for us. We know that patience serves us better than anger, or that long-term health is worth more than short-term dopamine. The failure is not intellectual; it is attentional. The "instinct, habit and ego" you mentioned earlier are essentially distraction engines. They flood the system with immediate, low-resolution demands. In this model, the Personal LLM acts as the **Anti-Distraction**. It doesn't lecture you on new concepts. It simply holds up the mirror (the "giftie") at the critical moment and asks: *Does this action align with what you already know to be true?* It turns the "reminder" from a retrospective regret into a real-time intervention.

Where to Park Park on the side of the footpath, without blocking the walkway or an entrance. Next to street furniture.

About the role The {{Role Title}} reports into the {{Reporting Line}} and is part of the {{Leadership Team Name}}. In this role, you will serve the {{Community Name}} through the implementation of {{Organisation}}’s ({{Org Acronym}}) Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (ED&I) Plan, {{Strategy Name}} Strategy and supporting action plan and Safeguarding priorities to ensure we create a welcoming, safe and inclusive environment across {{Domain}}. A core focus of the role will be building meaningful stakeholder relationships, working alongside business partners and communities to ensure effective implementation of these priorities in {{Org Acronym}} and across the wider {{Domain}} community through {{Local Units}}. Looking into {{Future Year}}, key priorities for this role will be to support and grow gender balance and inclusion, contribute to a more culturally capable system and ensure effective Safeguarding policies, processes, and practices are in place. About You As an advocate for change, you champion diversity, promote inclusive practices, and model culturally responsive behaviour. You’ll be leading a {{Team Size}} team, so the ability to operate strategically, influence others, but also roll up your sleeves and get things done will be essential. A mix of cultural expertise and pragmatism will be required to ensure you can build connections and drive change. Demonstrated experience and impact influencing systems to be more culturally capable (specifically {{Cultural Capability Focus}} cultural capability) and driving equity and inclusion will be an advantage. Experience building relationships and influencing positive change across a large and complex system is desired but not essential. About Us At {{Organisation}} we love what we do, we work hard and have fun! You’ll be joining a team of awesome people who are passionate about the game and each other, and you’ll be backed with support to thrive in your role. We know that life isn’t all about work, so we are open to flexible working options. We value diversity and inclusion and are committed to improving our cultural responsiveness. We embrace and respect each other’s values and we are so proud to be {{Certification}} certified. We welcome applications from people of all backgrounds and walks of life.

The popularity of “slop” as a concept points to something significant about how we experience digital culture in 2025, just as “algorithms” did last decade. In each case, the term’s usage gets less precise as it’s overloaded with everything we hate about the internet. And while the word itself becomes less meaningful, it reveals more about how we feel.

#745: Prime Daze

Plus: Klarna culture, Trump aesthetics and the joys of location-sharing

"Loyalty should be a two-way street and we should be able to vote our conscience and represent our district's interest... [My work] has brought years of nonstop never ending personal attacks, death threats, lawfare, ridiculous slander and lies...I have too much self-respect and dignity. I love my family way too much. And I do not want my sweet district to have to endure a hurtful and hateful primary against me by the president that we all fought for, only to fight and win my election while Republicans will likely lose the midterms. And in turn, be expected to defend the President against impeachment after he hatefully dumped tens of millions of dollars against me and tried to destroy me. It's all so absurd and completely unserious. I refuse to be a ‘battered wife’ hoping it all goes away and gets better.” If I am cast aside by MAGA Inc and replaced by Neocons, Big Pharma, Big Tech, Military Industrial War Complex, foreign leaders, and the elite donor class that can't even relate to real Americans, then many common Americans have been cast aside and replaced as well. There is no 'plan to save the world' or insane 4D chess game being played."

Right — **Goose** fits perfectly in the show’s internal logic. A goose in this taxonomy signals: **1. Vigilance** Geese are warning animals. They don’t fight well, but they *alarm* well. In institutional fiction, a “goose” is a watcher whose value is awareness, not authority. **2. Noise instead of intervention** They honk. They signal. But they don’t resolve danger; they externalise it. That matches the behaviour of the staffers who see problems, comment on problems, but never *fix* problems. **3. False authority** Geese act like they’re in charge. They posture, flap, and take up space, but ultimately they’re bluffing birds. The show uses that for characters who perform competence but don’t actually hold power. **4. Mild menace, low stakes** A goose can annoy you or nip you, but it’s not a threat. This is how the show codes male insecurity without giving it real weight. So if you’re identifying a specific character as “Goose,” what you’re actually reading is the show’s shorthand: **A noisy, self-important boundary sentinel with more alarm than action, more presence than substance.** It’s the exact midpoint in the show’s animal-to-character spectrum: * not the giggling small mammals * not the predatory men * not the grounded amphibian authority (Evelyn) * not the glamour creatures like Leila * but a sort of puffed-up perimeter bird If you want, tell me which character you meant by “Goose” and I’ll map them precisely against the show’s symbolic hierarchy.

NASDAQ sits frozen on its 50-day after a giant doji signalled “nobody in control,” just as tech vol, credit stress and CTA jitters start to swirl. And with SPX now moving more with NVDA than with its other 499 members, one slip at that $180 line could get very interesting very fast.