epsql

The rise of LLM based systems that show remarkable and improving reasoning traits prompts one not only to ask what knowledge is, but also what knowledge is for. Could knowledge be completely outsourced to external systems? Would we be able to have new ideas? Would insight play a role in anything? Without knowing anything deeply, how can anything at all be appreciated? How can a truly novel idea come about? Moreover, is knowledge only useful when necessary?

The fiat world is going to do its fiat things, narratives are cheap, NGU is important, fiat gainers might want to take a small holiday. nostr:note1cm84l83qgr2s7wzpkxfwq6xanhs4mc65trl8keedxpcvzvmgxhnqyem4cv

"Since full automation will make the world dramatically richer, owning even small amounts of capital will likely be sufficient to secure a comfortable retirement. As a result, most people will probably benefit enormously from full automation. But there is a risk that those who own negligible amounts of capital prior to full automation will be out of luck. With nothing but their wages to survive on, they may live dreary lives, and perhaps even starve. However, at least for citizens of high-income democracies, this risk seems to be quite small." Oh well, poor them! https://www.mechanize.work/blog/life-after-work/

I'm buying the dip out of fiat nostr:note1wz8rkm2clpdpwhdj6g2fkk3tah4x5l7elclg62pzxhnhgtcshwqqd2huwm

Most importantly, those 100 dollars won't be able to reveal to anybody where they came from and where they're going nostr:note1fdyglqnfhhkef2expscp52thsua9mkx6xa6h9f97apcyg96erxfq827hmh

Is ZCash the new Bitcoin? #asknostr