This meme explains almost everything about who has been promoting spam on #bitcoin network.
Bitcoin_To_The_Oblivion
npub1z09e...ufa9
#Bitcoin is the only way out of modern day debt slavery
All @Start9 node runners,
If you want to FILTER (aka stop relaying) runes for your node, there is some tweak in start9 OS that you should be aware about.
You need to disable Datacarrier instead of setting up Datacarrier size = 0. Start9 won't let you select 0 for datacarriersize but disabling datacarriersize would do exact same thing as setting your datacarriersize = 0.
There are some nuances when it comes to runes and inscriptions. Check this tweet from Jason Hughes. He tried to explain it in simple language.
ALWAYS REMEMBER THAT ADJUSTING THIS DATA CARRIER SIZE IS NOT CENSORING, IT'S FILTERING. IT TRULY MAKES YOU SELF-SOVEREIGN WHEN IT COMES RUNNING YOUR OWN NODE.
LAST BUT NOT LEAST, please run #bitcoin knots on your node instead of original #bitcoin core to REDUCE spam and point your hash to Ocean mining pool.
Please share this with your other Start9 node runners especially to those who doesn't support any kind of arb data (sorry SPAM...oh sorry SCAM) on #bitcoin network.
cc @Luke Dashjr @Bitcoin Mechanic @Giacomo Zucco
When I explain to someone about #bitcoin, I don't tell them there is so much to LEARN, I tell them there is so much to UNLEARN.
Unlearning would actually humble you and then your journey actually starts into #bitcoin from there.
Where are those people who said high fees will eventually kill spam?
Are you guys still sleeping on this?
Are you still going to rationalize spam?
Ditch #bitcoin core and start running #bitcoin knots
and don't forget to send your hash to Ocean
#bitcoin
If any of the miners (not the mining pool) want to show their support for the anti spam movement, I would suggest sending your hash to Ocean for the halving block.
It will send STRONG message to other mining pools that not all miners are GREEDY miners but some of them are actually ethical miners or miners with low time preference.
Please spread this message as much as you can to make sure it reaches out to the maximum number of miners in Nostr community.
LONG LIVE #BITCOIN (oh sorry #FREEDOM)
Show this excerpt from "The Fiat Standard" book to your fiat normie or no coiner friend(s) before we get into currency crisis.
Some of these normies might be able to understand where we are headed in fiat clown world.
#Bitcoin
This excerpt from the "The Fiat Standard" book really applies to a lot of Indian people who have blind faith in Modi (aka BJP) government.
I think you won't roast Trump fans anymore when you meet Modi fans. The amount of trust these people have in Modi is just way beyond anyone's imagination.
The more I read about statism the more I think that Modi fans will be the last people who will adopt #bitcoin. The more these statist people will listen & read about @Saifedean Ammous the more they will realize (deep down) how dumb they are.
@Saifedean Ammous - when are you releasing "The Fiat Standard" book in Hindi? I think some of the hard working Indian people need #bitcoin than anyone else.
Whoever is not bullish enough on Ocean mining pool they should read "Bitcoin and Energy Markets" chapter from the "The Fiat Standard" book by @Saifedean Ammous to understand
#bitcoin mining is still very underrated. There is so much upside left for Ocean.
I think bitcoiners (including ethical miners or miners with low time preference) gradually started realizing that Ocean is the only mining pool who is trying to play long game here and they are the only ones who actually care about the health of
#bitcoin network than almost anyone else in
#bitcoin mining community.
I think once some miners realize that how other mining pools have been exploiting them with FPPS payout model, they will switch to Ocean at some point to mine SPAM FREE blocks.
Maybe Ocean also needs one small nation state or one big player in mining, that might also change the whole game...!!!
Let's see how everything plays out...!!!
cc
@Bitcoin Mechanic
@Luke Dashjr
One of my friends met me today and he was telling me how lucky these people who HODL their #bitcoin for last 5-7 years.
He was also telling me that sometime you need couple of JACKPOTS like this in your entire life and you are all set.
It's funny how fiat normies overestimate talent and underestimate conviction, wisdom, economic incentive and HODLING.
This is what happens when you take your school education (which was designed by Rothschild and Keynesian Economists) very seriously.
YOU NEED TO HAVE STEEL BALLS FOR HODLING #BITCOIN MF...!!!
Where are those people who keep saying that most of the spam will be replaced by high fee monetary transactions?
Always remember that "Gambling/ Speculation has always been inherent part of human nature."
#bitcoin
Always make sure to run #bitcoin knots instead of Bitcoin core and send your hash to Ocean Mining.
All my Nostr friends,
Never ever forget to show this example when you explain the benefits of using Nostr to normies.
Sometimes I think that #bitcoin is not an innovation but it's discovery and that's what freaks out a lot of people.
For this same reason, we have to be very careful when some #bitcoin devs are taking #bitcoin in the wrong direction. (i.e. normalizing SPAMS, make layer 1 accessible for everyone (not anyone))
People should know that #bitcoin is the last chance to save humanity from slavery so, when someone attacks Bitcoin (aka taking Bitcoin development in the wrong direction), it's our responsibility to be as toxic as possible and call them out.
What we are doing with SHITCOIN magazine, should have been done way before then spam wouldn't have gone this far.
This meme explains the fall of #bitcoin devs community and why we need more WISE devs (who know more about Austrian Economics than programming the Bitcoin).
Bitcoin Developer (with ok knowledge of programming but very good understanding of Austrian economics > Bitcoin Developer (very good knowledge about programming but ok or no understanding about Austrian economics)
Few.
#bitcoin
This is called professional gaslighting...!!! 😎😎😎
Not sure when people will find out.
X (formerly Twitter)
DogeDesigner (@cb_doge) on X
“𝕏 does not have a choice but to obey local governments. If we don't obey local government laws, we will get shut down. We do our best to prov...
#Bitcoin price increases over the years -> more and more people will listen to @Saifedean Ammous -> more and more people will get rid of their financial advisors -> more and more people will move away from the fiat diversification scam.
#Bitcoin
Spam is flooding Bitcoin with useless transactions. This clogs the network, makes fees expensive, and pushes real payments out. Spam wastes resources and harms #Bitcoin 's usefulness as money.
Spammers say "spam is subjective" and "a valid transaction is valid." But spam has clear traits: it wastes space inefficiently and exploits #Bitcoin functions in malicious ways. High fees also don't justify spam, since demand should drive fees up, not attacks.
Spammers claim #Bitcoin can thrive with greedy miners only caring about money. But miners need Bitcoin to stay useful long-term to profit. If spam ruins Bitcoin's utility as money, that hurts miners too. Letting spam dominate blocks devalues #Bitcoin.
Some say you can't fight spam, but that's false. Bitcoin users have coordinated to fight spam before. Updating filters and getting miners on board sends a message about undesirable activity.
Making payments cheaper doesn't justify spam either. Cheaper fees reduce miner income, same as spam filters. But efficiency improves network value, benefiting miners long run. Spam to push scaling changes also dangerously rushes upgrades without proper testing.
"Satoshi embedded data on-chain, so spam is allowed." But Satoshi didn't bloat or exploit #Bitcoin . Reasonable data inclusion doesn't equal endorsing spam attacks on the network. What matters is intent and responsible use of resources.
"High fees will stop spam eventually." No - spammers currently pay the highest fees. They'll keep raising budgets to clog the chain. Real demand should drive fee prices, not attacks. Relying solely on pricing spam out fails to address the root problem.
"Everything is good for #Bitcoin." Not true - #Bitcoin has flaws and vulnerabilities like any system. Attacks can impair functionality. Defenses are needed to protect network reliability and user experience. This requires proactive effort from Bitcoiners.
You can fight spam by running updated node software (i.e. #BitcoinKnots or Ordirespector) , setting policies against spammy transaction types, asking developers for better defaults and UI controls, pointing hash rate at filtered mining pools like OCEAN MINING and staying vocal about protecting #Bitcoin .
#Bitcoin once had strict anti-spam rules that got relaxed over time. Spam isn't new - previous incidents led to things like Blockchain DNS and Counterparty flooding the network. But coordinated action reined these in. With motivation, spam can be mitigated again.
For more information, check out below website
cc @Bitcoin Mechanic @Luke Dashjr @jimmysong @Giacomo Zucco
Spammers say "spam is subjective" and "a valid transaction is valid." But spam has clear traits: it wastes space inefficiently and exploits #Bitcoin functions in malicious ways. High fees also don't justify spam, since demand should drive fees up, not attacks.
Spammers claim #Bitcoin can thrive with greedy miners only caring about money. But miners need Bitcoin to stay useful long-term to profit. If spam ruins Bitcoin's utility as money, that hurts miners too. Letting spam dominate blocks devalues #Bitcoin.
Some say you can't fight spam, but that's false. Bitcoin users have coordinated to fight spam before. Updating filters and getting miners on board sends a message about undesirable activity.
Making payments cheaper doesn't justify spam either. Cheaper fees reduce miner income, same as spam filters. But efficiency improves network value, benefiting miners long run. Spam to push scaling changes also dangerously rushes upgrades without proper testing.
"Satoshi embedded data on-chain, so spam is allowed." But Satoshi didn't bloat or exploit #Bitcoin . Reasonable data inclusion doesn't equal endorsing spam attacks on the network. What matters is intent and responsible use of resources.
"High fees will stop spam eventually." No - spammers currently pay the highest fees. They'll keep raising budgets to clog the chain. Real demand should drive fee prices, not attacks. Relying solely on pricing spam out fails to address the root problem.
"Everything is good for #Bitcoin." Not true - #Bitcoin has flaws and vulnerabilities like any system. Attacks can impair functionality. Defenses are needed to protect network reliability and user experience. This requires proactive effort from Bitcoiners.
You can fight spam by running updated node software (i.e. #BitcoinKnots or Ordirespector) , setting policies against spammy transaction types, asking developers for better defaults and UI controls, pointing hash rate at filtered mining pools like OCEAN MINING and staying vocal about protecting #Bitcoin .
#Bitcoin once had strict anti-spam rules that got relaxed over time. Spam isn't new - previous incidents led to things like Blockchain DNS and Counterparty flooding the network. But coordinated action reined these in. With motivation, spam can be mitigated again.
For more information, check out below website
Redirecting...
Spam is flooding Bitcoin with useless transactions. This clogs the network, makes fees expensive, and pushes real payments out. Spam wastes resources and harms #Bitcoin 's usefulness as money.
Spammers say "spam is subjective" and "a valid transaction is valid." But spam has clear traits: it wastes space inefficiently and exploits #Bitcoin functions in malicious ways. High fees also don't justify spam, since demand should drive fees up, not attacks.
Spammers claim #Bitcoin can thrive with greedy miners only caring about money. But miners need Bitcoin to stay useful long-term to profit. If spam ruins Bitcoin's utility as money, that hurts miners too. Letting spam dominate blocks devalues #Bitcoin.
Some say you can't fight spam, but that's false. Bitcoin users have coordinated to fight spam before. Updating filters and getting miners on board sends a message about undesirable activity.
Making payments cheaper doesn't justify spam either. Cheaper fees reduce miner income, same as spam filters. But efficiency improves network value, benefiting miners long run. Spam to push scaling changes also dangerously rushes upgrades without proper testing.
"Satoshi embedded data on-chain, so spam is allowed." But Satoshi didn't bloat or exploit #Bitcoin . Reasonable data inclusion doesn't equal endorsing spam attacks on the network. What matters is intent and responsible use of resources.
"High fees will stop spam eventually." No - spammers currently pay the highest fees. They'll keep raising budgets to clog the chain. Real demand should drive fee prices, not attacks. Relying solely on pricing spam out fails to address the root problem.
"Everything is good for #Bitcoin." Not true - #Bitcoin has flaws and vulnerabilities like any system. Attacks can impair functionality. Defenses are needed to protect network reliability and user experience. This requires proactive effort from Bitcoiners.
You can fight spam by running updated node software (i.e. #BitcoinKnots or Ordirespector) , setting policies against spammy transaction types, asking developers for better defaults and UI controls, pointing hash rate at filtered mining pools like OCEAN MINING and staying vocal about protecting #Bitcoin .
#Bitcoin once had strict anti-spam rules that got relaxed over time. Spam isn't new - previous incidents led to things like Blockchain DNS and Counterparty flooding the network. But coordinated action reined these in. With motivation, spam can be mitigated again.
For more information, check out below website
cc @Bitcoin Mechanic @Luke Dashjr @jimmysong @Giacomo Zucco
Spammers say "spam is subjective" and "a valid transaction is valid." But spam has clear traits: it wastes space inefficiently and exploits #Bitcoin functions in malicious ways. High fees also don't justify spam, since demand should drive fees up, not attacks.
Spammers claim #Bitcoin can thrive with greedy miners only caring about money. But miners need Bitcoin to stay useful long-term to profit. If spam ruins Bitcoin's utility as money, that hurts miners too. Letting spam dominate blocks devalues #Bitcoin.
Some say you can't fight spam, but that's false. Bitcoin users have coordinated to fight spam before. Updating filters and getting miners on board sends a message about undesirable activity.
Making payments cheaper doesn't justify spam either. Cheaper fees reduce miner income, same as spam filters. But efficiency improves network value, benefiting miners long run. Spam to push scaling changes also dangerously rushes upgrades without proper testing.
"Satoshi embedded data on-chain, so spam is allowed." But Satoshi didn't bloat or exploit #Bitcoin . Reasonable data inclusion doesn't equal endorsing spam attacks on the network. What matters is intent and responsible use of resources.
"High fees will stop spam eventually." No - spammers currently pay the highest fees. They'll keep raising budgets to clog the chain. Real demand should drive fee prices, not attacks. Relying solely on pricing spam out fails to address the root problem.
"Everything is good for #Bitcoin." Not true - #Bitcoin has flaws and vulnerabilities like any system. Attacks can impair functionality. Defenses are needed to protect network reliability and user experience. This requires proactive effort from Bitcoiners.
You can fight spam by running updated node software (i.e. #BitcoinKnots or Ordirespector) , setting policies against spammy transaction types, asking developers for better defaults and UI controls, pointing hash rate at filtered mining pools like OCEAN MINING and staying vocal about protecting #Bitcoin .
#Bitcoin once had strict anti-spam rules that got relaxed over time. Spam isn't new - previous incidents led to things like Blockchain DNS and Counterparty flooding the network. But coordinated action reined these in. With motivation, spam can be mitigated again.
For more information, check out below website
Redirecting...
In case, someone is wondering why we have been seeing constant wars between countries, read below 2 paragraphs from "The Fiat Standard" book by @Saifedean Ammous. Fiat currency is the REAL ROOT CAUSE of constant wars. Not sure when majority of population will find out.
MAJORITY OF POPULATION NEEDS TO STACK HARDER INSTEAD OF VOTE HARDER.
Maybe @Saifedean Ammous should talk more about these paragraphs in his podcast. These paragraphs align really well with Israel - Palestine and Russia - Ukraine conflicts.
"FIX THE MONEY FIX THE WORLD" #Bitcoin
Not sure when shitcoiners (on Bitcoin network) will understand this.
Please don't keep telling everyone (especially nocoiners) that everything is good for #Bitcoin especially when you know that something is an outright scam.
