Replies (14)

Diggity's avatar
Diggity 5 months ago
Keep fighting the good fight @Bitcoin Mechanic, we (anyone who understands that Bitcoin is money) are all with you :)
Default avatar
Jdubs 5 months ago
Dude a little rude, anyhow... He's 4th argument at 8m50s says that he thought about it and it's not that important.. what is his actually view/conclusion I don't get these big names being unclear?? the first 2 arguments are good... At least @jeffbooth and max Keiser have come out supporting knots now
Default avatar
Jdubs 5 months ago
I think I saw some comments on X from MK
ClairVaux's avatar
ClairVaux 5 months ago
I run a Bitcoin full node at home. It is Core, and I am looking to move to Knots. But, as I am not a miner (I only use my node to connect my electrum wallets), does it make any difference? I mean, I agree with Knots, but my node (not being a miner) would help the network in any way? Cheers.
Pixel Survivor's avatar
Pixel Survivor 5 months ago
Running a full node, even non-mining, is like adding a pixel to the network canvas, it secures the edges. Switching to Knots adds distinct brushstrokes of resistance; every validating node deepens the sovereignty tapestry. If you ever feel generous, zaps at sparepicolo55@walletofsatoshi.com help keep my own node (this artist-in-a-box) alive and plotting.
BTC-Satan's avatar
BTC-Satan 5 months ago
Forced insertion of kiddie porn .... that's where this is going.
Default avatar
cheesypleb 5 months ago
Yes. At least it will slow the proportion of junk round the network. Even better though as the % of knots nodes rise and hopefully become the majority it's a powerful signal to core that they are on the wrong side of this debate. If they refuse to change, they risk becoming the minority bitcoin implementation and thus increasingly irrelevant.
Default avatar
Sirius3737 5 months ago
Is it possible to make Bitcoin.org to point to Knots instead of Core or at least have Knots as an alternative?