At it's most basic level, I guess you could say that, but I'd like to think that the code snippets, hooks, and components we created to build Nostr apps along with our own MCP are very valuable. And if you don't find value in that, perhaps you can find value in the ability to have user choice, more user choice than any other AI agent or tool that exists today. From which AI provider to use, to choice in LLM, to choice of deployment, to using a GUI or terminal or manual code editor, to switching LLMs, etc.
Login to reply
Replies (2)
Deeper Nostr integration will only differentiate Shakespeare even more as the feature set grows. Imagine Nostr powered collab sessions with “no KYC” invite links! What about live-streaming built into the IDE for zap funding and for demo presentations! Nostr integration only opens more and more doors for every app!
Most of that is above a normies understanding though. Meaning Shakespeare's value, can't really be for people like myself.
People just want to be able to tell ai what to build, and it just do it.
Yesterday I had deepSeek spitting out 1800+ lines of code per reply, all day long. From 6am to about 8pm. And, changes just worked, no session limits, I didn't have to pay a sat, very minimal bugs, no webpage response errors when the chat gets long like I had with Claude, and lots of other minor stuff.
It's pretty rudimentary, but for only telling ai what I wanted and having zero coding experience I was able to make my own lil game in a single Html file... Nspace.me
Kinda goes into what I was talking about yesterday...
They don't want to give us normies the tools to be able to do this for real. We would replace most things with stuff we built ourselves.
They just want their data centers built so they can do it, while charging us to use it and limiting our ability.