If you’re optimizing health, skip the Bluetooth wearables.
Most trackers sit directly on your skin and pulse non-native EMF 24/7 — not ideal for mitochondria, sleep, or hormones.
A low-tech approach actually gives you cleaner signals from your own biology.
Pen + paper for sleep, movement, sunlight, hydration, and mood beats another always-on device.
If you want metrics, use an old-school heart-rate chest strap (Bluetooth off) or choose a device that stays in true airplane mode.
Just keep in mind: it’s easy to get more connected to the data than to yourself.
Remove the middleman + the noise and your body will communicate with you as long as you’re listening.
Replies (7)
Yeah, that's in part why I never got one. Thank you for the comprehensive response 🙏
Agree on your whole thought process, but I’m just not gonna be writing everything down everyday knowing myself…
Been using the ours gen 2 and 3 because they are available 2nd hand without subscription, and seem the least intrusive to me.
But, just how worried should we be about the ”non native EMF” pulsing?
Any specific intel to refer to?
This is the way
Well said.
I ditched my Apple Watch.
Polar Heart rate Monitor back in the day was cool to train within a range but your advice is in tune with nature.
Low to No tech can do fitness wonders.
Track how you feel.
thats a follow. My-man.gif
How is pen and paper doing any good without something doing actual readings? How are when you think about it readings going to be as accurate as continuous ones? Who says the EMF is doing any harm whatsoever and with what proof?
