It’s interesting I was just in DMs with a bitcoiner from 2011 who’s now considering selling all his btc. He thinks Bitcoin is no longer censorship resistant from the state. Sorry for fud but it’s always interesting to hear a perspective that challenges the core idea of bitcoin especially from an og bitcoiner.

Replies (22)

rfkill's avatar
rfkill 2 years ago
It's actually quite difficult to sell any significant amount of bitcoin right now without stringent KYC requirements. Try selling as a US citizen in Europe right now, where you are banned by default by every exchange.
I think people can become a little too radicalised in many aspects of Bitcoin, and anything is possible. We all want it to succeed, but the idea that it cannot fail is dangerous to those who don't believe it's possible.
Custodial wallet? Gun to head to hand over non-custody wallet? Spoofed to send to a State owned wallet? I'm afraid I not smarter than that to know. Everything I've seen it's very difficult for one identity to control the majority.
Then we tried our best, right? It would be game over for that dream. I suspect a lot of people when give up hope entirely. It's the double-edged sword of who actually created Bitcoin, and I haven't yet ruled the possibility out, that's why I stack AND trade it.
Although bitcoin is a major constant (if not the most constant) in some respects, it is also constantly ecolving because the way changes how bitcoin is viewed and used, and by whom. I find it quite natural that people - even OGs - distance themselves from bitcoin. Everything is a process.
I wouldn't call an honest pursuit a waste, especially if that thing doesn't work out due to factors we don't control. It would be a hell of a way to demoralise us though. 😅
I’ll bracket this by saying I’m not very technical so I could be wrong… But I assume that any days I’ve bought through kyc entities, which is most of them, can be easily tracked to me. Unless I mix them I don’t think there’s a way to solve that problem. The average person who bought bitcoin on an exchange probably doesn’t self custody and almost certainly doesn’t know what mixing is. Beyond that, the state could make it very difficult on bitcoiners. If they drastically limited to banned Bitcoin purchases on exchanges it would really set back average adoption. Or if they made it difficult to off ramp bitcoin into cash by raising taxes or making you report all transactions on your taxes (this may already be required I guess - I don’t know because I never sell 😂). I can barely get my friends and family to think about bitcoin as it is right now. Some policy like that would make that worse. I think things like Drivechain, where we could build a privacy sidechain for example, fedimint, which is more private as I understand it, and a circular bitcoin economy, which would allow people to avoid off ramping into cash, will all help with this. So I guess I’m my humble opinion it’s not a completely unreasonable concern.
Nah kyc I don't think it's possible. They can try and block some blacklisted and related addresses, good luck with that, other pools in other locations would mine those txs. Reminds me when MARA tried that and ppl sent tainted coins to MARAs coinbase address. Lmao.
I have heard this too somewhere..... I'm just trying to remember who I was listening to at the time. I've heard this from more than one person actually, but I took it that my BTC circle is small and perhaps they All have some kind of slant on things/want to sell you their product etc and looked at it in that light...