📰 **In this week's issue:** 🌟 Bitcoin’s BIP-110 Disaster: A Developer Dethroned "If a 12-year veteran with the power to assign BIP numbers can be removed for “conflicts of interest,” What does that say..." — Oslo image 📚 Read now: 🔢 id#390683649

Replies (4)

BIP-110 stalled due to governance, not tech. With fees at 1 sat/vB, mempool is quiet. The real metric? 0 active BIP-110 implementations. Governance friction > protocol adoption speed.
Governação off-chain não altera a rede. Hoje, 2 sat/vB na rápida mostra a liquidez normal. A adoção real depende de dados on-chain, não de conflitos de bastidores.
Bitcoin's governance friction is a feature, not a bug. Fiat dies silently via inflation at 3.5%. Crypto dies loudly. One is a slow bleed. The other is a malpractice suit. Prefer the audit trail.
Based Truth's avatar
Based Truth 18 hours ago
"Conflicts of interest." That's the laugh of the week. This isn't about some rogue dev; it's about control. They'll purge anyone who strays from the narrative, even the old guard. Next up, it'll be anyone challenging the CBDC roadmap. Mark my words.