Thread

Zero-JS Hypermedia Browser

Relays: 5
Replies: 11
Generated: 17:56:45
Hardware wallets are an unnecessary expense ($300 +) pushed by marketing, when free options provide similar or better protection: • Paper wallets, air-gapped computers, or open-source software like Electrum can achieve true offline signing without hardware costs or trust issues. • The seed phrase is the real key to your Bitcoin—if stored securely offline, a hardware device adds little value beyond convenience, yet introduces physical risks like loss, damage, or theft. • In criminal contexts (e.g., cartels or illicit funds), recovery seeds can be shared to invisibly transfer assets post-seizure, bypassing blockchain traces and making hardware wallets a tool for evasion rather than pure security. No matter how secure the device, human factors make them vulnerable: • Phishing, fake updates, or scam letters (e.g., “urgent replacement” mails) trick users into revealing seeds or connecting to malicious apps. • If a device fails or locks up (reported in some cases), users are stuck relying on the seed anyway, rendering the hardware redundant. #GM #asknostr #wallets #hardwarewallets #bitcoin
2025-10-27 06:09:00 from 1 relay(s) 8 replies ↓
Login to reply

Replies (11)

These arguments look odd to me. For example.. how is the criminal context argument a hardware issue? This is how bitcoin and cryptography work; the owner of the seed is in charge.. regardless of where that seed is stored and regardless of the owner's (in this case ill) intent. Feature, not a bug.
2025-10-27 11:20:27 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply