So I'm always willing to hear the other side. @Shinobi does make a really strong argument. But it's interesting to me... He makes the argument that people can make a transaction and pay as much as they want for it and that's none of anyone else's business. And I agree with this point.
But that same argument can be made to the software. Why can I no longer change the setting of OP_Return that's running on MY personal hardware?
I understand his arguments that the filter isn't doing anything... But why are my choices being limited? Shouldn't I have the freedom to tweak the software the way I want? Instead I'm being told if I want any of the security updates that come with new software, I MUST accept less choice.
I don't believe that was addressed in the podcast.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
You can, run Knots. You have an option no matter what Core does. That's my point. Why is there a nonstop smear and bullshit campaign attacking core developers when there is software that is using the same consensus code that Core does doing what you want?
Most of the people attacking developers don't even use Core, they already run Knots. So why are they being such deceptive and manipulative scumbags towards developers of software they don't even use?