Demanding FOSS with no exception makes the capital expenditure to assemble/deliver a physical wallet a daunting proposition... disincentivizes places like Coinkite to exist since it forces them into a race to do it the cheapest until the DIYer method just wins out with COTS options.
I can understand their decision to protect a portion of their code in the name of protecting the part of their business that assembles/delivers physical products.
Login to reply
Replies (2)
This is the inference point they're spamming to convince you to turn a cheeck.
It's false and dangerous logic.
They literally borrowed from trezer first and renamed the code base to remove trezor from it. Trezor called them out BTW.
Then get forked, and suddenly realized having a FOSS license means people can fork your shit, freak out, and close it up, shouting about "CLoNiNg" and "VC money"
At least foundation is still FOSS innit