Right, but I have no doubts that she would approve doing the same thing to others if she could.
She's a "civil servant", meaning that she always got paid by states one way or the other.
This time she just fell victim of the same state dynamics that supported her (at our own expense of course).
Login to reply
Replies (1)
This is a very weak argument without any proof. You are just estimating, what she might would to, without proofing this intentions. This is destructive to argue like this. Good behavior should be accepted while bad behavior should be blamed in my opinion. Potential behavior is a behavior that can not be proofed and therefore does not count.