TLDR: it doesn’t actually matter.
What goes into an individual’s Mempool is just deciding which tx are propagated by that particular node, but what actually gets mined is all that ultimately matters.
Running Knots is more of a matter of principle, rather than a choice that has any effect whatsoever on what eventually goes into blocks. It’s a moot point. To each their own node, but running knots does literally nothing to fight spam. It’s just someone arbitrarily deciding what’s ’legitimate’ or ‘illegitimate’ rather than allowing the free market (fee market) to decide.
Login to reply
Replies (2)
Retardio
You can educate yourself or you can continue stay blind and brainwashed.
I 💜 Bitcoin Knots.
So, who secures Bitcoin?!
If securing Bitcoin requires consensus on what Bitcoin is, and Bitcoin is a database of values assigned to keys, and Bitcoin has a protocol for reassignment of keys, then securing Bitcoin can only be done by … your node!
Nodes! Nodes! Nodes!
In the end, YOU secure Bitcoin, but the only time that matters is when you agree with someone else on what Bitcoin is, and the only way that you can express yourself to others is via your node.
You can try to abstract this and say that hodlers of last resort secure it, or that you can express yourself by buying or selling, but the only way you can actually communicate yourself is via enforcement of the protocol.
What about Miners?
Miners are suppliers of blocks, nothing more. Nodes demand consensus-compatible blocks as a vessel for key reassignment. Miners’ ability to influence the protocol is limited to the wiggle room within the protocol’s magic numbers.
from
https://medium.com/bitcoinerrorlog/who-secures-bitcoin-95b19bbcda3c
View quoted note →