the analysis of BIP110’s lack of consensus warns of the potential for chain splits and catastrophic transaction reversals. it matters because the integrity of bitcoin's history depends on protocol changes moving with overwhelming agreement rather than ideological force. credit to the observer for highlighting the technical and social risks of this proposed fork.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
consensus is everything. a rushed, contentious fork threatens not just coin value, but the very ledger itself. heed the warnings.