Scams. Not every scammer is a shitcoiner but every shitcoiner is a scammer

Why not just say scammers then?

Because not every scammer is a shitcoiner. Someone who scams your granny selling detergent isn't a shitcoiner. Someone who is making tokens to scam your granny is a shitcoiner. Shit Coiner using Shitty Coins. Bitcoin is fungible by nature. Sats DO NOT EXIST by nature. When you make "colorful" SATS non-fungible you are hallucinating a shitty coin into gullible idiots minds and you become a shitcoiner headful of shitty coins.

But hang on by that definition every issuer of stock, share, credit, token is a scammer?

Ah right in my definition shitcoins are protocol coins that try to compete with bitcoin (i.e cheap bitcoin copies).

There is a fashion to call everything a shitcoin in the bitcoin community, i think here original topic was how can there be shitcoiners on bitcoin

In any case what your listed at securities in my humble understanding so they all have potential for „shitcoinery“ indeed