Most people are still followers, which is actually fine in the context of choice and self responsibility. But in a bad system that creates contradictory incentives, the above reality causes terrible long term consequences.
It’s basically true in either context, but in one environment, toxic incentives cause enormous suffering, while in another it enables strong standardization without hampering creativity and change.
(I almost didn’t respond because of your “I can’t believe Lyn Alden renoted this” remark. If you want to add a thought go ahead. But the moralization of casual social interaction and thinking out loud just comes off as entitled and holier-than-thou. Just a suggestion.)
Login to reply
Replies (1)
You posted in the following style -
… cartoonish (like Ren and Stimpy). This kind of post feels designed to provoke a reaction, not invite real dialogue. The replies are just a chorus of “so true” from people who already agree, … what’s the point of having a convo in an echo chamber?
comments section: bobbleheaded agreement bots and recycled slogans.
This writing is … a synchronized yes-machine. Super vague, super polarized, and blaming of the individual with no context. So yeah I am very surprised Lyn reposted it with also no context. Who even knows what ‘group’ of people you’re judging?