Thread

Zero-JS Hypermedia Browser

Relays: 5
Replies: 7
Generated: 20:34:51
What has truly stagnated is our ability to propose and collaborate on new and better systems - new political, governmental, financial, social, etc. the broken ones hold fast to protect themselves like a fortifying parasite, while the competition dies out or trails it’s ability to ‘catch up’ - it’s too slow. Definitely progress on the fringes and in small pockets - yet it’s worth pondering for a while why the above happened and what’s next? I link it to broken systems where incentives are wrong and bad entities have armour and too big to fail properties, the fact the system’s own protection mechanism largely sits on top of being too large + complex + intertwined for any alternative approach’s adoption strategy to be cost or time effective. Coupled with a significant over bloated legal system that makes much of what could be innovated gray or illegal - an example being private communities and roadblocks to their experimentation and existence. My pain point is the effort and time to exhaust these horribly conceived systems is now a frame of centuries - when it could (read: should) be decades. During the past few hundred years - it was only decades… and we’ve since built a nightmare that refuses to evolve.
2023-07-13 09:14:20 from 1 relay(s) 2 replies ↓
Login to reply

Replies (7)

I agree with what you are saying but believe that it will resolve itself just as fast but with more violence than it would when it doesn't protect itself. Pent up change will come through in shocks instead of moderate small changes.
2023-07-13 09:46:06 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓ Reply
Perhaps. What still surprises me is how passive the world was in general about quite literally accepting being coerced or forced to accept an untested rushed and questionable effectiveness injection. Even over a 24 month time frame, sanity went out the window and common sense aborted. And how little accountability we know we will ever see. Not one person I know trusts their government or representatives. Yet… throw in abuse of a few emergency laws, and some financial gain with ‘get rich quick’ Pharma, and a media campaign pushing mass fear - and we’ll you get a flock of sheep, herded by 1:100,000th the number of sheep dogs. Insane efficiency in control to effort ratio. Insane. The push for control (as opposed to liberty and freedom) is incredibly biased toward governments today. Technology made this worse. ‘Comfortable enough’ breeds apathy and prisoners who self-police - as opposed to ‘do what’s right for you’ (and not malicious). Expecting an active push back at enough scale is a very far way off from happening again. Look at the Hong Kong riots… state will win long term. Teacher and union protests may squeeze out an extra 1% salary.. when the officials have budgeted for 3-4%. Any country with insane inflation or recent bankruptcy - no real people’s outcome. People are just too ‘busy’ to expend energy outside of their comfortable enough existence. Global equality growth (poverty decline) is making this worse. Trends are not in favour of people’s led revolutions this century.
2023-07-13 18:11:01 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply
Thanks. I’ll have a listen. I’d wager our ‘aging population’ isn’t a root cause problem either, and instead a reflection of our inability to build efficient systems that scale. Intuitively, having more, greater experienced people, should result in accelerated innovation and efficiency - we are going the reverse. We’ve failed to leverage efficiency at scale (outside of capitalism), while dawdling at managing population growth and increases consumption. Recycling is one such great fail - and it continues to be a joke - we don’t even design for it or have strategies.
2023-07-17 16:37:15 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓ Reply
Population, at least in Germany, isn’t growing. Recycling, it seems, might once again be solved by burning waste. E.g. even from articles against the copenhagen incineration plant one can see, that it works: https://zerowasteeurope.eu/2019/11/copenhagen-incineration-plant/ Of course your argument is not, that the technology does not exist, but that we fail to utilize it at scale. To that I can only say that consensus is hard, and it is not made easier by technology that I would expect to make it easier. The reason could really be missing revenue streams next to selling eyeballs.
2023-07-20 04:53:16 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply