I forwarded this to @Phundamentals who has immersed himself in mathematical proofs quite a bit over the last couple years. I've heard him highlight the need for mathematical rigor on more than one occasion. Also, there is a community of very smart people who might find this idea interesting. I told @Phundamentals he should pitch his work to that community too. Personal takeaways from these concepts you've presented: Both FA and FO are skill dependent. Higher skill means more quality and quantity of FA is possible. Higher skill should also result in lower rates of FO. It also seems related to the dynamics of entering a "flow state". That seems to be reliant upon skill level, level of challenge presented, etc.

Replies (3)

To add to the boundaries of my original statement, this is not a lie. image
Risk always breaks down to frequency vs severity. I feel like FAFO has to do with severity without nuance but it a good simple 80iq message: play with fire -> eventually burn your dick off
Yes, and your dick will never find out again. Play with fire over your capacity too much and you will find yourself tapped out on the find out because you are dead and can no longer fuck around.